A shorthand for magic and magical skills relating to medicine and the practice of medicine.
Notably blanket healing magic that simply undoes wounds without proper medical care is not medimagical.
You will find there are two VERY Different kinds of healer, Those barely more than doctors using only Medimagic and to those capable of truly miraculous healing.
Systemic prejudice within healthcare systems that leads to discriminatory diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes based on a patient's race, gender, disability, socioeconomic status, or perceived credibility. It goes beyond individual bias to include institutional practices, diagnostic criteria, and research gaps that systematically disadvantage certain groups. It manifests as dismissing pain, attributing symptoms to psychological causes without evidence, or providing less aggressive care based on biased assumptions.
Example: Studies show Black patients are systematically under-treated for pain compared to white patients, based on false beliefs about biological differences in pain tolerance. Women with heart attacks are more likely than men to have their symptoms dismissed as "anxiety," leading to fatal delays in care. Patients with psychiatric diagnoses often have their physical symptoms automatically attributed to their mental health condition ("diagnostic overshadowing"). This is bigotry baked into the structure of medical knowledge and practice. Medical Bigotry.
Derogatory terms or labels, often disguised as clinical language, used to discredit, demean, or pathologize a person's lived experience, identity, or health complaints. These are not formal diagnoses but weaponized pseudo-clinical terms deployed to dismiss patients (especially from marginalized groups) by implying their problems are "all in their head," a sign of weakness, or a character flaw. They shortcut medical investigation by blaming the patient.
Example: A woman with debilitating, unexplained chronic pain is told she's just "hysterical" (a term with a deeply sexist history pathologizing the uterus). A patient with complex symptoms is labeled a "frequent flyer" or "hypochondriac" by staff, ensuring their future concerns are met with eye-rolls, not exams. The slur "crocks" (for patients with "crock" of complaints) is used in some hospital slang. These terms serve to gatekeep medical resources and absolve clinicians from diagnostic effort. Medical Slurs.
A modern, passive-aggressive insult derived from mental health discourse, used to dismiss, invalidate, or pathologize someone's emotions, opinions, or online behavior. The phrase "Take your meds" or its variants ("Did you skip your meds?", "Someone's off their lithium") weaponizes psychiatric treatment as a rhetorical cudgel. It implies the target is inherently irrational, unstable, or delusional, and that their legitimate passion, criticism, or unconventional perspective is merely a symptom of non-compliance with medication. This slur reinforces mental health stigma by framing medication as a tool for social compliance and silencing, rather than a personal medical choice.
Example: In a heated political debate on Twitter, User A presents a well-sourced but emotionally charged critique of a policy. Unable to counter the arguments, User B replies, "Lmao, the conspiracy theories are flying today. Take your meds, schizo." The slur doesn't engage the content; it attempts to medically discredit the speaker, associating their intensity with mental illness and suggesting they'd be silent if properly medicated. It's a way of winning an argument by falsely diagnosing your opponent as crazy. Medicine Slurs.
The underlying prejudiced belief system that makes "medicine slurs" effective: the notion that people who take psychiatric medication are less credible, less rational, and should be quieter. It's the bigotry that equates being medicated with being intellectually or morally deficient, and views medication's primary purpose as making difficult or dissenting people easier to manage. This bigotry stigmatizes both the need for medication and the act of taking it, creating a catch-22 where speaking with passion risks being labeled "unmedicated and unstable," while being openly medicated risks being labeled "too chemically altered to think clearly."
Example: A streamer is open about managing their ADHD with medication. During a live debate, they get rightfully angry about a blatant falsehood. Chat immediately fills with, "Your Vyvanse is talking, not you," and "Calm down, you're overmedicated." The bigotry here frames their legitimate emotional response not as a reaction to dishonesty, but as a pharmaceutical side-effect. It denies their agency and authenticity, reducing their entire persona to a drug interaction, which is both dehumanizing and designed to silence them. Medicine Bigotry.