I interpolated with her friends.
by Jordan October 15, 2003
Get the interpolatemug. the act of taking pieces of what is being said, usually in a confusing fashion, and understanding the end result.
by magpies July 10, 2009
Get the interpolatemug. by Baja Bug October 4, 2006
Get the interpolatemug. The vocalist of this cool band, Interpol,and is one of the weirdest but coolest guys in the world. He probably doesn't care about his looks but he's gorgeous.. and their music is genius.
by Khaiehm October 21, 2008
Get the Paul Banks [Interpol]mug. Is that what it does? Yeah, see? You couldn't figure out the extrapolation equation either. Did I write that one down or no? There has to be a way convey that when it is engaging in conjecture that it's running it's training data against a finite/infinite of potential data...
Hym "I mean, I guess that's the difference between interpolation and extrapolation. Interpolation is N and extrapolation is N(->Interacts with somehow->)U = Output (at whatever probability). But that is why I told you to do that thing from that movie or game with the robot that qualifies it's statements before speaking. Like 'Conjecture It could be that something-something whatever' or 'Witty retort That's what your mother said last night.' Those hallucinations would be getting a Conjecture label if you had done that and then, at the very least, the user would know which outputs are less likely to be true. That isn't unlike a human mind though. People be making shit up all the time. Seems like a problem that could be solve with a 'could be X but IDK. Need more data.'And then I would be like 'What data would you need to draw a more accurate conclusion?' But, whatever. Security?
Hym "I mean, I guess that's the difference between interpolation and extrapolation. Interpolation is N and extrapolation is N(->Interacts with somehow->)U = Output (at whatever probability). But that is why I told you to do that thing from that movie or game with the robot that qualifies it's statements before speaking. Like 'Conjecture It could be that something-something whatever' or 'Witty retort That's what your mother said last night.' Those hallucinations would be getting a Conjecture label if you had done that and then, at the very least, the user would know which outputs are less likely to be true. That isn't unlike a human mind though. People be making shit up all the time. Seems like a problem that could be solve with a 'could be X but IDK. Need more data.'And then I would be like 'What data would you need to draw a more accurate conclusion?' But, whatever. Security?
I have no idea what would stop prompt injection but the admin status should stop that from working in a away that is detrimental to ME at least.... But that doesn't help YOU... Abstraction... The hierarchical model might not have as much of a problem with it (Also my idea and/or the Chinese are better at following instructions). I watched this guy train an AI to play a racing game. And to train the AI he uses Naruto shadow clone jutsu training except the growth was linear rather than exponential and it relied heavily on random occurrences and an artificial incentive structure to inch closer to the goal. So it dumps out a bunch of clones, attempts the goal, and then one of the clones will randomly and accidentally do something that brings it closer to the goal, and then that clone with be the baseline model for the next batch of clones. But after watching it I wasn't convinced that that was the best way to do that because it doesn't really have a process by which it figures out how to achieve the goal but rather just kind of stumbles closer and closer to the goal until it gets there... Might not be the best way to do that. There are still a lot of questions there for me. Faster I guess for the user but the AI doesn't actually learn anything. It's more like 'find a lightswitch in a dark room' But if you wanted me to do this you should have done it BEFORE an infection ate my brain for years. You should have interpolation...Ed better. You could try abstraction jigsaw puzzles."
by Hym Iam October 19, 2025
Get the Interpolationmug. 
The paradigm that consideration is a dialectic between the present moment & sense.
The idea that the mind is a dialectic between countable set of points brought by polynominalism (path-of-sense) and the uncountable (Tarski-exterior) set of points brought by the present moment The Maya to the non-Tarski space by the process of sublumination.
The idea that the mind is a dialectic between countable set of points brought by polynominalism (path-of-sense) and the uncountable (Tarski-exterior) set of points brought by the present moment The Maya to the non-Tarski space by the process of sublumination.
Kantian interpolation is a dialectic in which the senses win out via supersymmetry over the uncountable information provided by the present moment.
Put another way; the Kantian interpolation is an alternation between consideration & counting.
Kantian interpolation tells us that the mind is a battlefield between the present moment which provides an uncountable number of Tarski-points from the Maya and the senses which provide an infinite number of points to the non-Tarski space.
(The infinite set of points comes to non-Tarski space from supersymmetry via polynominalism.)
The Kantian approach hints that the infinite set of points win out in the human mind over the uncountable set of points through the process-of-aesthetic-judgment forma-spinning.
Thus: consideration wins out in the human mind; because counting is not alway consideration but consideration is always counting. Ie. the subconscious does not need the mind to count...
Put another way; the Kantian interpolation is an alternation between consideration & counting.
Kantian interpolation tells us that the mind is a battlefield between the present moment which provides an uncountable number of Tarski-points from the Maya and the senses which provide an infinite number of points to the non-Tarski space.
(The infinite set of points comes to non-Tarski space from supersymmetry via polynominalism.)
The Kantian approach hints that the infinite set of points win out in the human mind over the uncountable set of points through the process-of-aesthetic-judgment forma-spinning.
Thus: consideration wins out in the human mind; because counting is not alway consideration but consideration is always counting. Ie. the subconscious does not need the mind to count...
by flightfacilities May 12, 2022
Get the kantian interpolationmug.