Marxism says power exists only as a dialectic.
Ultra-nihilism says power does exist...even as a dialectic..
Polymodernism says power only exists as Athenism..the move to super-symmetry.
Ultra-nihilism says power does exist...even as a dialectic..
Polymodernism says power only exists as Athenism..the move to super-symmetry.
by flightfacilities February 22, 2022
Metanominalism is the counterpart to Boolean nihilism (the thesis that math cannot count numbers).
Metanominalism proffers that only reason for numbers' exist is that they can count themselves.
Metanominalism proffers that only reason for numbers' exist is that they can count themselves.
by flightfacilities February 18, 2022
Hypernihilism is the idea that egoism is a unit of nihilism.
Meta-nihilism is the idea that consciousness is THE unit-of-egoism.
Meta-nihilism is the idea that consciousness is THE unit-of-egoism.
by flightfacilities November 10, 2021
Non-Tarski spaces contain not only the set (infinity) of points in the space-interior; but also the uncountable set (superset) of points on the interior WALL of the sphere.
Although non-Tarski shapes contain only interior points: they are porous.
This is due to the spinning-panformal-primes on the Tarski sphere..
Although non-Tarski shapes contain only interior points: they are porous.
This is due to the spinning-panformal-primes on the Tarski sphere..
Tarski shapes (superset on the exterior of the shape) are nonporous; while non-Tarski shapes (superset on the wall-interior) are porous. The concept of internal (infrasonic) cavitations helps explain the relative porousness of non-Tarski shapes by assigning them to spinning-panformal-primes embedded in the interior wall of the non-Tarski shape.
These (internal) cavitations allow the points of gravity-frequentism (dark frequentism) to escape outside of the non-Tarski shape.
These internal-cavity shapes explain the ontology of anti-Fauvic spaces from an emergentist perspective.
These (internal) cavitations allow the points of gravity-frequentism (dark frequentism) to escape outside of the non-Tarski shape.
These internal-cavity shapes explain the ontology of anti-Fauvic spaces from an emergentist perspective.
by flightfacilities May 08, 2022
Paradigm that an irrational number can never exceed infinity.
The declarative foundation of computer science.
The declarative foundation of computer science.
Dirac-ism is based on the phenomenon that cutting arc-tangent-lengths below the line of diameter produces a 2D surface with an irrational number of points. Since an infinity-number of points can only be obtained from a circle cut at the line-of-diameter: statistical regression created by the points below the half-way mark can never reach infinity.
by flightfacilities May 17, 2022
The paradigm that consideration is a dialectic between the present moment & sense.
The idea that the mind is a dialectic between countable set of points brought by polynominalism (path-of-sense) and the uncountable (Tarski-exterior) set of points brought by the present moment The Maya to the non-Tarski space by the process of sublumination.
The idea that the mind is a dialectic between countable set of points brought by polynominalism (path-of-sense) and the uncountable (Tarski-exterior) set of points brought by the present moment The Maya to the non-Tarski space by the process of sublumination.
Kantian interpolation is a dialectic in which the senses win out via supersymmetry over the uncountable information provided by the present moment.
Put another way; the Kantian interpolation is an alternation between consideration & counting.
Kantian interpolation tells us that the mind is a battlefield between the present moment which provides an uncountable number of Tarski-points from the Maya and the senses which provide an infinite number of points to the non-Tarski space.
(The infinite set of points comes to non-Tarski space from supersymmetry via polynominalism.)
The Kantian approach hints that the infinite set of points win out in the human mind over the uncountable set of points through the process-of-aesthetic-judgment forma-spinning.
Thus: consideration wins out in the human mind; because counting is not alway consideration but consideration is always counting. Ie. the subconscious does not need the mind to count...
Put another way; the Kantian interpolation is an alternation between consideration & counting.
Kantian interpolation tells us that the mind is a battlefield between the present moment which provides an uncountable number of Tarski-points from the Maya and the senses which provide an infinite number of points to the non-Tarski space.
(The infinite set of points comes to non-Tarski space from supersymmetry via polynominalism.)
The Kantian approach hints that the infinite set of points win out in the human mind over the uncountable set of points through the process-of-aesthetic-judgment forma-spinning.
Thus: consideration wins out in the human mind; because counting is not alway consideration but consideration is always counting. Ie. the subconscious does not need the mind to count...
by flightfacilities May 12, 2022
A postulate of space-ontology which states that not only does power not exist; but a power dialectic does not exist either.
Ultra-nihilism literally delineates a structure-of-historicism to append Marxist incompleteness.
Ultra-nihilism literally delineates a structure-of-historicism to append Marxist incompleteness.
Marxism argues that power does not exist; power dialectics do.
Marxism is a special case of alt-realism which states that nothing exists except in-dialectic.
Ultra-nihilism appends the metalogical incompleteness of Marxism by proffering that NOTHING exists as a dialectic: not even power.
Marxism is a special case of alt-realism which states that nothing exists except in-dialectic.
Ultra-nihilism appends the metalogical incompleteness of Marxism by proffering that NOTHING exists as a dialectic: not even power.
by flightfacilities December 22, 2021