While the Duke of Wellington was fighting off Napoleon from the front there was also some other guy who ambushed Napoleon from the back. His name was Blucher. He was an old man and didn't really care for his life nor what happened to him and his regiment. But he knew that this fat little Corsican shit needed to be wiped off the planet.
And Blucher didn't take no shit. One time in some battle I completely forgot but know the anecdotes, Blucher's horse got shot down and he fell to the ground with his dead horse on top of him. He had to wait until the bloody massacre was over so the survivors could lift his old ass up from his dead horse.
That's how badass he was, and let me tell ya if it weren't for Blucher, Wellington probably would never have won that battle. Maybe not, who knows. Nevertheless they both PWNED Napoleon at Waterloo. It was such an awesome victory that meanwhile when Thomas Jefferson was doing his stuff, he read the news in Europe about how Napoleon got OWNED in Waterloo! And guess what, he shat in his pants.
And Blucher didn't take no shit. One time in some battle I completely forgot but know the anecdotes, Blucher's horse got shot down and he fell to the ground with his dead horse on top of him. He had to wait until the bloody massacre was over so the survivors could lift his old ass up from his dead horse.
That's how badass he was, and let me tell ya if it weren't for Blucher, Wellington probably would never have won that battle. Maybe not, who knows. Nevertheless they both PWNED Napoleon at Waterloo. It was such an awesome victory that meanwhile when Thomas Jefferson was doing his stuff, he read the news in Europe about how Napoleon got OWNED in Waterloo! And guess what, he shat in his pants.
Historian #1: Dude, Wellington was such a camper! Blücher was like totally like the main force on the battlefield, like he totally like destroyed Napoleon with like an ambush. Like it was sooooo cool.
Historian #2: OMG dude, everyone knows that Wellington was like NOT a camper and like Gebhard Leberecht von Blücher was only the finishing touch! Like OMG you don't know shit!
Historian #1: I refuse to listen to such bigotry! BEGONE!
Historian #2: Neigh sire, the truth is here to stay!
Historian #2: OMG dude, everyone knows that Wellington was like NOT a camper and like Gebhard Leberecht von Blücher was only the finishing touch! Like OMG you don't know shit!
Historian #1: I refuse to listen to such bigotry! BEGONE!
Historian #2: Neigh sire, the truth is here to stay!
by BullshitPoster September 25, 2012
Get the Gebhard Leberecht von Blücher mug.by M November 15, 2004
Get the liberachecrotchy mug.Related Words
by ameanchili March 30, 2019
Get the Liberace mug.by Carlos Mora September 15, 2007
Get the liberacegay mug.A liberal hick. Incredibly hard to find in America and said to simply be myth. Whether or not this strange species of human exists remains a mystery.
by OHGODNOTPOLITICS April 19, 2010
Get the Liberick mug.Noun.
Fandom term coined by idiotic_savant. When your fanfic is recommended through a limerick, generally written by jadarene, it is a limerec.
Fandom term coined by idiotic_savant. When your fanfic is recommended through a limerick, generally written by jadarene, it is a limerec.
"Did you see that limerec for Four Broomsticks by idiotic_savant?"
"Yeah, I did! Jadarene made it sound so hot that I just had to scurry off to read it."
"Yeah, I did! Jadarene made it sound so hot that I just had to scurry off to read it."
by Chrystal Barr June 18, 2004
Get the Limerecs mug.A modern word for someone who politically combines Libertarian views and Democracy, short for (Libertarian-Democrat). They assert that Democracy functions best on smaller scales. They place hopes of decentralizing representative-democracy. Mostly all of them I've listened to, believe in the democratic appeal of social justice, but they reject modern government and hope for the possibility of a practical one with state control being reduced to a minimum. Economically, they hold to the idea of attaining a common sense free-market, with production being held individually and collectively, so that people have the liberty to choose what best fits them. A lot of them I've heard, say the only thing that should be held in common is land itself; seeing land as something that all individuals should have equal right of access to.
Most of them come off as know-it-all's. They're usually alternative lifestyle people or neo-hippie like.
They can sometimes be mistaken as Anarchistic or Communistic, but they don't believe in having no government, nor do they believe that a state dictatorship should rule and control everything the people do under a moneyless society. No, they're just a dreaming Libercrat in their own utopian minds.
They can sometimes be mistaken as Anarchistic or Communistic, but they don't believe in having no government, nor do they believe that a state dictatorship should rule and control everything the people do under a moneyless society. No, they're just a dreaming Libercrat in their own utopian minds.
by Shapeshifter89 June 27, 2013
Get the Libercrat mug.