No post-chugging chugging

A.k.a., never drive after you've "had a few".

No post-chugging chugging, unless someone else is behind da wheel --- i.e., you either have a friend/relative give you a ride home, or take a cab, bus, or other form of public transportation when you leave da pub.

by QuacksO February 23, 2024

Bakugo Poster Incident

The Bakugo Poster Incident refers to a TikTok of a girl smearing her USED TAMPON‼️‼️ over a poster of Bakugo from MHA. it’s really gross don’t look it up 🙁

Person A: “yo you ever heard of the Bakugo Poster Incident”
Person B: “oh my god yeah it’s so gross…it’s why I ended up leaving the MHA fandom”

by Fanfiction Terminology July 2, 2024

national post ur bsf day

july 5th ~ national post a good picture of ur bsf dayyy

1: “hey chicken butt,yk what td is??”
2: “uhh no sweet cheeks, what is it?”
1: “ NATIONAL POST UR BSF DAY”

by monkeyrive July 4, 2024

Valid Post-Truth

The recognition that "post-truth" is not simply a descent into falsehood but a transformation of how truth functions—a shift from truth as correspondence to truth as performance, truth as identity, truth as weapon. Valid Post-Truth argues that the old regime of truth (objective, universal, authoritative) has eroded, and a new regime has emerged where truth claims are judged not by their correspondence to reality but by their effects, their alignment with identity, their viral potential. This is not the end of truth but its mutation—truth becomes something else, something we don't yet fully understand. Valid Post-Truth is the attempt to understand this mutation without simply lamenting it.

Example: "He'd spent years lamenting the death of truth, the rise of lies, the end of reason. Valid Post-Truth showed him a different picture: truth hadn't died; it had transformed. Now truth was what went viral, what felt right, what performed identity. He didn't have to like it, but he had to understand it. The old truth wasn't coming back; a new truth was here."

by Abzugal February 21, 2026

Scientific Postcritique

A movement in science studies that moves beyond the hermeneutics of suspicion—beyond always asking what power, ideology, or hidden interest lies behind scientific claims. Postcritique doesn't reject critique but supplements it with attention, repair, and reconstruction. It asks not just "what's wrong with this science?" but "what's valuable? What can we build? What should we preserve?" It's science after the deconstruction, after the critique, after the suspicion—still critical, but also constructive, also caring.

"We've spent decades deconstructing this field's biases. Scientific Postcritique says: okay, now what? What's still useful? What do we build next? Critique without reconstruction is just nihilism with better vocabulary."

by Abzugal February 23, 2026

Epistemological Postcritique

An approach to knowing that moves beyond the hermeneutics of suspicion—beyond the reflexive questioning of every knowledge claim's hidden interests, power relations, and ideological functions. Postcritique doesn't abandon critique but recognizes that perpetual suspicion is exhausting and ultimately barren. It asks what we can affirm, what we can trust, what we can build. It's epistemology that has done its therapy, processed its trauma, and is ready to risk believing again—knowing the risks, choosing to trust anyway.

"You've gotten so good at deconstructing every claim that you can't believe anything anymore. Epistemological Postcritique says: critique is a tool, not a permanent address. At some point, you have to risk trusting, knowing you might be wrong. Suspicion as a lifestyle is just another kind of certainty."

by Abzugal February 23, 2026

Scientific Post-structuralism

The application of post-structuralist thought to science: questioning binary oppositions (nature/culture, objective/subjective, fact/value), deconstructing scientific categories, exposing the instability of scientific concepts, and revealing how scientific knowledge is produced through discursive practices rather than simply discovered. Post-structuralism doesn't deny that science works—it denies that science works the way it says it works. It's science forced to confront its own textuality, its own rhetoric, its own constructedness.

"You keep appealing to 'nature' as if it's a stable foundation. Scientific Post-structuralism says: 'nature' is a concept with a history, produced through discourse, serving particular interests. It's not a ground—it's an effect. Your science is text, not truth. Deal with it."

by Abzugal February 23, 2026