Because its not valid

Its not valid because I said so!!111!1!!!!!!1!!

Because its not valid bro

by Zahori March 18, 2022

End-of-Semester Valedictorian

Typically observed in higher education or at the high school level. Refers to the phenomenon in which a student who has done minimal coursework, suddenly exhibits an immense amount of effort, completing (or attempting to complete) every assignment; this is accompanied by a "sudden", doctoral level, concern about one's Grade Point Average (GPA) and academic standing. This term originated from decades of confused professors and teachers musing," if student name had demonstrated this effort and consideration for their GPA throughout all four years of college/high school, they could be valedictorian of their class". Addendum: This term can also apply to the class rank parents expect their student to achieve when they turn in one missing assignment (typically two to five days after the end of the semester); however, it should not be confused with "End-of-Semester Salutatorian".

The college professor sighed and drank deeply into a cup of coffee, "I know Sarah needs an 'A' in my class in order to have a high enough GPA in his major to graduate, just another 'End-of-Semester Valedictorian" :takes another drink of coffee: "thankfully, I teach college".
*or*
The AP Physics teacher was just about to take a drink of her ice-cold stale coffee when "Jeff", who spent most of the course roaming the halls, busted into the room for the fifth time that day, and asked "what can I do to get a 98?" Jeff was clearly an example of the dreaded "End-of-Semester Valedictorian".

by InkDr.237 December 8, 2022

Self Diagnosis Is Valid

A Tumblr tag used by idiots who think it's okay to pretend to have autism or that think they have autism because of TikTok. Same with DID, ADHD, Tourette's, and other disabilities/disorders. Bro? They're serious mental conditions. Disorders aren't xenogenders! And no, you don't know better than a doctor with a PHD. Get off Tumblr, touch grass, and get a life.

Emily, 13 year old self-diagnosed autism/DID haver and coiner of some new dissociative disorder or "system" trait: GRRR! I'm sick of these uneducated fools thinking that my self diagnosis isn't valid. DOCTORS HATE WOMEN AND BLACK PEOPLE!!!11!! DiAGNOSIS IS A PRIVILEGE!!!!! #SELF DIAGNOSIS IS VALID
Lucy, an actual autistic person: What the fuck are you on about? You do know that Autism doesn't just mean you're forgetful and DID isn't the hip trendy disorder that everyone wants, right? I deal with a lot of crap from idiots for my autism and it's extremely disrespectful that you-
Emily: ABELIST!!!!!! DNI RIGHT NOW!!!!! *blocked*

by Twig 757 December 26, 2023

When the proof remains valid

This refers to a situation where someone is accused of something, and while there is evidence presented, there is uncertainty about whether that evidence is genuine or fabricated, yet it has been officially deemed valid.

Nicholas: “Yo, you think that buttass text he showed was real?”
Marinucci: “They looked fake at first, but they got verified."
Kmoh: "When the proof remains valid.”

by KmohHasOpps May 5, 2025

Law of Spectral Logical Validity

The principle that logical validity exists on a spectrum between absolute and relative, with infinite gradations and multiple dimensions. Under this law, an argument isn't simply valid or invalid—it's valid to some degree, in some logical systems, under some interpretations, for some purposes. The law of spectral validity recognizes that validity is not binary but continuous, that arguments can be more or less valid depending on the standards applied, and that the question isn't "is it valid?" but "where on the spectrum of validity does this argument fall?" This law is essential for understanding debates between different logical frameworks, where each side's arguments are valid within their own system but may appear invalid in another.

Law of Spectral Logical Validity Example: "She evaluated his argument using spectral logical validity, mapping it across multiple dimensions: validity in classical logic (high), validity in paraconsistent logic (medium), validity in fuzzy logic (depends on truth values), validity in everyday reasoning (pretty good). The spectral coordinates explained why the argument worked for some audiences and failed for others. She stopped calling it invalid and started understanding where it lived."

by Abzugal February 16, 2026

Law of the Valid Ad Hoc

The principle that ad hoc constructions—explanations, arguments, solutions devised for a specific purpose—can be genuinely valid within their limited domain. The law is a defense of pragmatism against purism: not everything needs to be universal to be useful. A theory that explains one phenomenon, even if it fails elsewhere, is valid for that phenomenon. A solution that works once, even if not replicable, is valid for that once. The law of the valid ad hoc reminds us that validity is not all-or-nothing; it comes in degrees and contexts. The valid ad hoc is the workhorse of practical life, even if it doesn't make it into textbooks.

Example: "She jury-rigged a fix for her broken printer using tape and a paperclip. It worked exactly once, for exactly one document, then fell apart. The law of the valid ad hoc said: it was valid for that document, at that moment. It wasn't engineering; it was survival. Sometimes survival is enough."

by Dumu The Void February 17, 2026

Law of the Fallacy Validity

The principle that under specific conditions, what appears to be a fallacy can actually be valid reasoning. The law acknowledges that context matters: an argument that commits a fallacy in one setting may be perfectly reasonable in another. Ad hominem, attacking the person, is fallacious in formal debate but valid when assessing credibility (you wouldn't trust a tobacco company's research on smoking). Appeal to authority is fallacious when the authority is irrelevant but valid when expertise is genuine. Slippery slope is fallacious when speculative but valid when causal chains are real. The law of the fallacy validity reminds us that fallacy labels are not absolute; they're tools, not weapons. What matters is not whether an argument fits a fallacy pattern but whether it's reasonable in context.

Example: "He accused her of ad hominem for mentioning the speaker's industry funding. She invoked the law of the fallacy validity: attacking the person is valid when their credibility is relevant. The funding mattered; the ad hominem was justified. He called it a fallacy; she called it context. She was right."

by Dumu The Void February 17, 2026