Person 1: Bro why do oppreshun olympians of all shades support Hamas in 2023?
Person 2: Because if you kang against Rome, you open door to Mecca
Person 2: Because if you kang against Rome, you open door to Mecca
by Davis Aldo November 15, 2023
Get the If you kang against Rome, You open door to Meccamug. Include hate speech, bullying, or any other statements meant to discriminate or incite violence against others Include e or incite violence against othersInclude hate speech, bullying, or any other statements meant to discriminate or incite violence against othersInclude hate speech, bullying, or any other statements meant to discriminate or incite violence against othersInclude hate speech, bullying, or any other statements meant to discriminate or incite violence against othersInclude hate speech, bullying, or any other statements meant to discriminate or incite violence against othersInclude hate speech, bullying, or any other statements meant to discriminate or incite violence against othersInclude hate speech, bullying, or any other statements meant to discriminate or incite violence against othersInclude hate speech, bullying, or any other statements meant to discriminate or incite violence against othersInclude hate speech, bullying, or any other statements meant to discriminate or incite violence against othersInclude hate speech, bullying, or any other statements meant to discriminate or incite violence against othersInclude hate speech, bullying, or any other statements meant to discriminate or incite violence against othersInclude hate speech, bullying, or any other statements meant to discriminate or incite violence against others
Include hate speech, bullying, or any other statements meant to discriminate or incite violence against othersInclude hate speech, bullying, or any other statements meant to discriminate or incite violence against othersInclude hate speech, bullying, or any other statements meant to discriminate or incite violence against othersInclude hate speech, bullying, or any other statements meant to discriminate or incite violence against othersInclude hate speech, bullying, or any other statements meant to discriminate or incite violence against othersInclude hate speech, bullying, or any other statements meant to discriminate or incite violence against othersInclude hate speech, bullying, or any other statements meant to discriminate or incite violence against othersInclude hate speech, bullying, or any other statements meant to discriminate or incite violence against othersInclude hate speech, bullying, or any other statements meant to discriminate or incite violence against othersInclude hate speech, bullying, or any other statements meant to discriminate or incite violence against othersInclude hate speech, bullying, or any other statements meant to discriminate or incite violence against othersInclude hate speech, bullying, or any other statements meant to discriminate or incite violence against othersInclude hate speech, bullying, or any other statements meant to discriminate or incite violence against others
by ParaparaPartyCrow August 29, 2024
Get the Include hate speech, bullying, or any other statements meant to discriminate or incite violence against othersmug. Any atrocious act that may significantly harm the field of mycology on the short-term or long-term in any act, setting, platform, or medium (e.g., popular media, social platforms, online forums, websites, research papers, identification efforts, foraging, or amateur/hobbyist endeavours). Crimes Against Mycology are particularly prevalent in, but are by no means exclusive to, amateur mycology communities.
Examples are as follows:
1. Making false and/or inaccurate claims that the subject (most commonly a nondescript dark, hard protuberance on any tree) should be identified as 'Chaga' (Inonotus obliquus); often lacking substantiation or basic ID skills or knowledge. 'Chagaslighting'.
2. Overgeneralizing and/or spreading misinformation on edibility or toxicity to (e.g., claiming that "every mushroom is toxic when touched").
3. Identifying a collection "with confidence" in cases in which it can reasonably be assumed that this would be virtually impossible to do with the available information.
4. "Publishing" new species on Index Fungorum.
5. Saying "all mushrooms are edible, once"
6. Pale Satanmints.
7. Unsubstantiated hypersplitting of established genera.
Examples are as follows:
1. Making false and/or inaccurate claims that the subject (most commonly a nondescript dark, hard protuberance on any tree) should be identified as 'Chaga' (Inonotus obliquus); often lacking substantiation or basic ID skills or knowledge. 'Chagaslighting'.
2. Overgeneralizing and/or spreading misinformation on edibility or toxicity to (e.g., claiming that "every mushroom is toxic when touched").
3. Identifying a collection "with confidence" in cases in which it can reasonably be assumed that this would be virtually impossible to do with the available information.
4. "Publishing" new species on Index Fungorum.
5. Saying "all mushrooms are edible, once"
6. Pale Satanmints.
7. Unsubstantiated hypersplitting of established genera.
"Counting the equally abused ganodermatoids, the Perenniporia s.l. clade now has forty-nine genera, when it could easily be treated as about seven. The authors don't even mention Ganoderma (s.l.) in this paper. They also neglect to mention three of the seventeen pre-named genera in this clade (Diacanthodes, Flammeopellis, and Megasporia)."
"Holy shit, that's a crime against mycology!"
"Holy shit, that's a crime against mycology!"
by Crinoid March 31, 2023
Get the Crime against mycologymug. Me: I saw that you got picked up for crimes against nature.
Jorge: I know. I tapped a squirrel last weekend.
Jorge: I know. I tapped a squirrel last weekend.
by Urban Parker January 27, 2017
Get the crimes against naturemug. by Cuddizle June 10, 2011
Get the Against Me!mug. The Energy Argument Against Abortion is a novel, inarguable, and irrefutable argument against abortion that can be found on the END ABORTION community on X formerly known as twitter. The Energy Argument Against Abortion is as follows: Albert Einstein's mass-energy equivalence principle dictates that mass is fundamentally a form of energy. Thus, the law of conservation of energy dictates that the energy in the form of matter with mass taken in by a living system that is converted into free energy cannot be greater than the free energy utilized by the living system to carry out that CONVERSION of matter into free energy that can be utilized by the living system which mathematically means that NO NET ENERGY is added to a living system despite intake of matter with mass. Thus, as dictated by the second law of thermodynamics, the total energy of the human zygote/human fetus as a living system CANNOT increase after the moment of conception and must CONTINUALLY DECREASE since the total free energy of the human being living system progressively DECREASES as the total entropy of the human being living system progressively INCREASES since NO NET ENERGY is added to the human being living system despite intake of matter with mass into the human being living system. Thus, the human zygote/human fetus has the HIGHEST TOTAL ENERGY as a living system out of all forms of the human being including born human beings making the murderous act of abortion WRONG and IMMORAL under any circumstance!
Example: "Hey bro, I just used The Energy Argument Against Abortion in order to COMPLETELY DEBUNK every single pro-abortion apologist and it was completely FANTASTIC!"
by The Global Revolutionary April 15, 2024
Get the The Energy Argument Against Abortionmug. by Diego bafa November 17, 2023
Get the NATIONAL PIN YOUR BF AGAINST THE WALL DAY AND KISS HIMmug.