Conspiratising

Coming up with a conspiracy theory, so "theorise" but particularly for conspiracy theories. Can be done solo or in a group.

American spelling: conspiratizing

Like "I've been conspiratising that Jay Slater was never in the mountains."

Or "9/11 was an inside job? You're just conspiratising."

by Curliboii July 8, 2024

conspirative

someone who uses hearsay, misinformation, and rumors to validate their archaic agendas and beliefs against particular members of society.

Person 1: Did you hear about what they are doing behind the scenes?
Person 2: That is being spread by a conspirative so I would not believe It.

by solitaireman65 March 31, 2024

conspiratist

noun.
1) A person who studies conspiracies with a scientific, methodical approach—seeking hidden truths through careful research and logical analysis.

2) (Often used ironically) A scientist or investigator whose rigorous discoveries end up earning them the label “conspiracy theorist” from the masses.

"Even the most credentialed researcher can be branded a conspiratist when their data suggests realities that challenge the official narrative."

by epicbit February 21, 2025

Conspiratista Es Fallacy

A fallacy where someone dismisses all arguments of a person by labeling them a "conspiracy theorist." The label functions as a conversation-ender: if you're a conspiracy theorist, nothing you say needs to be heard. The fallacy lies in treating the label as refutation, ignoring that some conspiracy theories have proven true and that the label is often used to dismiss legitimate inquiry. It's ad hominem by association—using the stigma of "conspiracy theorist" to avoid engagement.

"I raised questions about government transparency and corporate influence. Response: 'Oh, you're one of those conspiracy theorists.' That's Conspiratista Es Fallacy—using the label to dismiss, not engaging a single point. Some questions about power are legitimate; the label avoids them. Calling me a conspiracy theorist doesn't make my questions disappear."

by Dumu The Void March 2, 2026

Haec Est Theoria Conspirationis Fallacy

A fallacy where someone dismisses arguments by labeling them "conspiracy theory." The label functions as automatic dismissal: if it's a conspiracy theory, it's false by definition. The fallacy lies in treating the label as refutation, ignoring that some conspiracy theories have been proven true and that the label is often used to suppress legitimate inquiry. It's a conversation-ender that uses stigma instead of argument.

"I documented instances of corporate malfeasance. Response: 'That's just a conspiracy theory.' That's Haec Est Theoria Conspirationis Fallacy—using the label to dismiss documented facts. Calling it a theory doesn't make the documents disappear. The label avoids engagement, which is exactly why it's used."

by Dumu The Void March 2, 2026