Skip to main content

2+2=4 does not=2+2=4

Inter-subjectively

Hym "I really don't think that's the issue. I think when I say 'God is Evil' you hear 2+2=5. So, 2+2=4 does not=2+2=4. Unless... Do you think whether or not God is good is subjective? Either subjective or objective. If it's objective, it's either objectively good or it's objectively evil. If so, which is it? O'Connor let's it. And that's the problem with the online discourse. You're allowed to say 2+2=5 all you want but you aren't allowed to BE Nick Fuentes or 👉 Let me ask you this: How is what Nick Fuentes believes any different from someone who believes in Sharia law? He's a theocract. So he believes the state should be controlled by the religion (which is what Shraria). Whay else? The women have a role? Anti-Lgbt? Your protestations about him (and me) being in public entirely validates their 'Islamophobia.' The can just transpose his beliefs onto the believes of the Muslims and say 'This guy believes what they believe and even THEY don't want them here!'
And you give them an excuse to be dismissive and ignore you on the topic. Which is what they're doing. And you can probably broaden that and say they can transpose THAT onto the the Palestinians and THAT justifies them being dismissive about the protests! And THAT is where the 'If those protesters when to Gaza... (They would get thrown off a roof for being gay or something being the insinuation)' rhetoric comes from. All justified by you without you realizing it. That's why they use the plants. That's the point of doing it. They set you up to approve of 'Islamophobia' by boosting a guy with a Quasi-Sharia interpretation of the religion. they watch you justify excising him from society, you say 'It's not the religion it's the fundamentalism', and then they can internalize that and say 'The fundamentalism is why I'm doing this!' I mean, you're like God's bipolar girlfriend. 'StoOoOop! You're hurting him!' But the bombs keep falling. They'll ignore you and just keep doing whatever they're doing all justified by your own manufactured consent. It's the conservative rhetoric not dismissive? But I digress... The idea that 2+2=4 does not=2+2=4 (inter-subjectively) speaks to a broader point about how people justify behavior or decision and what people accept as true. I could even go further and say it speaks to how people justify 'Evil.' But I'll have to get into that later."
by Hym Iam May 31, 2024
mugGet the 2+2=4 does not=2+2=4 mug.
when youre so bored you decided to write every key from left to right (including numpad) and also the shift versions of those keys.
man, im so bored, im gonna type `~1!2@3#4$5%6^7&8*9(0)-_=+/*-qQwWeErRtTyYuUiIoOpP{}\|789+aAsSdDfFgGhHjJkKlL;:'"456zZxXcCvVbBnNmM,<.>/?123 0. into urban dictionary and see whats there!
by monokuma plush toy August 28, 2023
mugGet the `~1!2@3#4$5%6^7&8*9(0)-_=+/*-qQwWeErRtTyYuUiIoOpP[{]}\|789+aAsSdDfFgGhHjJkKlL;:'"456zZxXcCvVbBnNmM,<.>/?123 0. mug.
Person 1: I hate you!
Person 2: `~1⅑⅐ ⅒ ¹!¡ 2 @² 3 #³ 4 $⁴5 %⁵ 6^⁶7 &⁷8*⁸9(⁹0ⁿ)⁰∅-—_–·=≈≠+∞
Person 1: *cries*
ugh shut up you goofy lil`~1⅑⅐ ⅒ ¹!¡ 2 @² 3 #³ 4 $⁴5 %⁵ 6^⁶7 &⁷8*⁸9(⁹0ⁿ)⁰∅-—_–·=≈≠+∞...
by Iampotato9749 September 21, 2023
mugGet the `~1⅑⅐ ⅒ ¹!¡ 2 @² 3 #³ 4 $⁴5 %⁵ 6^⁶7 &⁷8*⁸9(⁹0ⁿ)⁰∅-—_–·=≈≠+∞ mug.
How bored are you?
There's no way you're this bored of a person
Like how did you even type all of this- whatever
I typed the most long word ever! it's "qQwWeErRtTyYuUiIoOpPaAsSdDfFgGhHjJkKlLzZxXcCvVbBnNmM1¹2²3³4⁴5⁵6⁶7⁷8⁸9⁹0⁰@#№$¢_&-_+±(<)>/*★"”'’:;!¡?¿~`|•♪√πΠ÷×§¶∆£¢€¥^↑°′=≠{(})\%‰©®™✓"
by Boredom words August 16, 2023
mugGet the qQwWeErRtTyYuUiIoOpPaAsSdDfFgGhHjJkKlLzZxXcCvVbBnNmM1¹2²3³4⁴5⁵6⁶7⁷8⁸9⁹0⁰@#№$¢_&-_+±(<)>/*★"”'’:;!¡?¿~`|•♪√πΠ÷×§¶∆£¢€¥^↑°′=≠{(})\%‰©®™✓[] mug.
A word no one’s ever thought of before. This happens when you press each letter, number and punctuation mark on the keyboard without pressing the Shift key to reveal the numbers on the number line and then using the Shift key you type the special symbols instead of the numbers.
Me: “Let’s see what words we haven’t typed into Urban Dictionary yet. Have we typed qazqazwsxwsxedcedcrfvrfvtgbtgbyhnyhnujmujmikikololpp?”
Daryl: “Yes, this word is already there.”
Me: “So let’s think of another word. Qawzsexdrcftvgybhunjimkolpqawzsexdrcftvgybhunjimkolp, this word has even more sex than anyone’s ever seen”
Daryl: “Yeah. I would type `~1!2@3#4$5%6^7&8*9(0)-_=+qQwWeErRtTyYuUiIoOpP{}aAsSdDfFgGhHjJkKlL;:'"\|zZxXcCvVbBnNmM,<.>/? instead.”
by bluestinger66 August 17, 2023
mugGet the `~1!2@3#4$5%6^7&8*9(0)-_=+qQwWeErRtTyYuUiIoOpP[{]}aAsSdDfFgGhHjJkKlL;:'"\|zZxXcCvVbBnNmM,<.>/? mug.

2+2=4

How do you know it's not a false thing you believe that helps you survive? Jesus christ Alex the second I called you out as a plant you HARD SPIRALED into the Jordan Peterson nonsense tower. You're spiraling HARD right now?
Hym "Because if you have 2 to apples in a bucket and you place 2 more apples into that same bucket... You not have IIII 👈 this many. You can change the term you use to represent IIII 👈 This many. You can call 'that many' 4 or four or IV or, shit, you can even call it 5! That being said, there COULD VERY WELL BE some kind of hidden mathematical principle that affects 2+2=4 in some significant way. But, it's just low hanging fruit at this point. That's year 1 stuff. We're past all that."
by Hym Iam May 23, 2024
mugGet the 2+2=4 mug.

Share this definition

Sign in to vote

We'll email you a link to sign in instantly.

Or

Check your email

We sent a link to

Open your email