Theory of Scientific Struggles

A broader, more conflict-oriented view of scientific progress. It posits that major advances occur through protracted struggles between old and new worldviews, where the triumph of a new theory involves overturning entrenched power structures, reputations, and funding streams. Knowledge isn't just built—it's fought for.

Theory of Scientific Struggles Example: The decades-long struggle for the acceptance of plate tectonics. Early proponents like Alfred Wegener were ridiculed by the geological establishment, which was deeply invested in fixed-continent models. The new theory only won after a prolonged struggle involving new evidence (seafloor mapping) and a generational shift in scientists, overcoming immense institutional inertia.

by Dumu The Void February 7, 2026

Theory of Scientific Power

Analyzes science as a system of power, not just truth. It asks: Who has the authority to certify knowledge? Who controls the labs, journals, and grants? Scientific power is the ability to set research agendas, define legitimate methods, anoint experts, and declare what counts as a "fact" with real-world consequences.

Theory of Scientific Power Example: A pharmaceutical company funds dozens of clinical trials on its new drug. It exercises scientific power by strategically publishing only the favorable studies, influencing treatment guidelines through sponsored key opinion leaders, and shaping the entire medical consensus around its product, turning research into a tool for market dominance.

by Dumu The Void February 7, 2026

Theory of Scientific Monopoly

Examines when a single institution, theory, or methodology holds exclusive control over a field of knowledge, suppressing alternatives. This monopoly stifles innovation and dictates the "correct" way to inquire, punishing heresy with ex-communication from grants and publications.

Theory of Scientific Monopoly *Example: In the mid-20th century, behaviorism held a near-total monopoly in academic psychology. Research on internal mental states like cognition or emotion was dismissed as "unscientific." Grant agencies, journals, and tenure committees were dominated by behaviorists, effectively outlawing alternative approaches for a generation.*

by Dumu The Void February 7, 2026

Theory of Scientific Oligopolies

A situation where a small, entrenched group of elite institutions, journals, or research paradigms collectively control a field. They may compete amongst themselves, but they present a united front against outsiders, maintaining a closed system that determines whose work is credible and what questions are valuable.

Theory of Scientific Oligopolies Example: The "top five" journals in many social sciences. Publishing in them is essential for career success. This creates a scientific oligopoly where a small set of editorial boards, sharing similar methodological preferences, gatekeep the entire discipline, marginalizing innovative or heterodox research that doesn't fit their mold.

by Dumu The Void February 7, 2026

Theory of Scientific Oligarchies

Focuses on the small, powerful networks of individuals—senior professors, editors, grant committee chairs—who wield disproportionate influence. These scientific oligarchs control resources and reputations, often perpetuating their own intellectual lineages and protecting the status quo through personal connections and peer review.

Theory of Scientific Oligarchies Example: A handful of senior figures in a field who sit on every major grant review panel, editorial board, and prize committee. They consistently award funding and prestige to their own former students and collaborators, creating a self-perpetuating oligarchy that controls the field's direction and limits upward mobility for outsiders.

by Dumu The Void February 7, 2026

Theory of Scientific Elites

Studies the social stratification within science, where a credentialed elite possesses the cultural capital, institutional access, and specialized language that separates them from both the public and from less-prestigious researchers. Their elite status grants their pronouncements automatic authority.

Theory of Scientific Elites Example: The IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) scientists. They constitute a scientific elite whose aggregated reports carry immense weight in global policy. While based on evidence, their elite status gives them unique power to define the crisis and its solutions, potentially marginalizing localized or indigenous knowledge systems in the process.

by Dumu The Void February 7, 2026

Theory of Scientific Hegemony

The most pervasive form of control, where the scientific worldview becomes the dominant, "common sense" framework for understanding reality itself. It’s when scientific authority extends beyond the lab to shape culture, ethics, and politics, making alternative ways of knowing (e.g., spiritual, artistic, traditional) seem pre-modern or invalid.

Theory of Scientific Hegemony *Example: The mantra "Follow the Science!" during a public health crisis. While well-intentioned, it can establish a scientific hegemony where complex political trade-offs (liberty vs. security) or ethical choices are framed as purely technical problems with a single scientific solution. This sidelines democratic debate and frames dissent as "anti-science," consolidating authority in expert institutions.

by Dumu The Void February 7, 2026