Theory of Regionalism of Material Conditions

The analysis that the economic, technological, and physical resources available to a society—its "material conditions"—are not globally uniform, but are powerfully shaped by regional geography, climate, indigenous species, and historical path dependency. This theory argues you can't understand a region's politics, culture, or conflicts without first understanding what its land can grow, what its mountains hide, and what its rivers can carry. Fate is written in topsoil and ore deposits.

Example: The Theory of Regionalism of Material Conditions explains why the steppe regions of Eurasia, suited to horse pastoralism but not dense agriculture, repeatedly produced nomadic cavalry empires that clashed with the settled, grain-based imperial bureaucracies of China and Europe. The grass literally shaped global history.

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 4, 2026

Theory of Locality of Material Conditions

A more granular version of regionalism, focusing on how hyper-local variations in material conditions—a single valley's microclimate, a specific hill's defensibility, a unique local mineral spring—create radically different societal outcomes even within the same broader region. It emphasizes that history is made not on continents, but in parishes, neighborhoods, and watersheds.

Theory of Locality of Material Conditions Example: In medieval Europe, a village built on a rocky hill with a freshwater spring (local material conditions) could become an independent, fortified town. A village a few miles away on a fertile floodplain might become a wealthy but vulnerable estate of a feudal lord. Their divergent political fates were dictated by a few meters of elevation and access to water.

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 4, 2026

Theory of Secret Power Struggles

The perspective that the publicly visible political drama—elections, speeches, scandals—is largely theater, masking the real, hidden conflicts for dominance occurring between clandestine factions within intelligence agencies, corporate boards, financial networks, and organized crime. In this view, the president or prime minister is often a frontman, while the true battles are fought in encrypted chats, safe houses, and boardrooms with no windows.

Example: The sudden, inexplicable resignation of a seemingly powerful minister might be explained by the Theory of Secret Power Struggles as the outcome of a hidden coup within the domestic intelligence service, which blackmailed him over a decades-old file, a fight completely invisible to the press and public.

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 4, 2026

Theory of the Secret State

The concept that within the formal, constitutional structure of a government, a parallel, unaccountable, and permanent apparatus exists—often rooted in intelligence, military, and police agencies—that operates autonomously to protect what it defines as "state security," regardless of the elected government's policies. It is the deep state not as a conspiracy of individuals, but as an institutional zombie with its own mind, budget, and goals.

Example: According to the Theory of the Secret State, when an elected leader tries to radically alter foreign policy or reduce intelligence budgets, they are quietly stymied by leaks to the press, bureaucratic inertia, and even manufactured crises by career officials in agencies like the CIA or MI6, who believe they are the true guardians of the nation, above transient politicians.

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 4, 2026

Theory of Global Secret Elites

The belief that a single, coordinated, and immensely wealthy transnational cabal—often described in terms like the "Illuminati" or "globalists"—secretly directs world events from behind the scenes. This theory posits a unified group manipulating finance, media, and conflict to achieve a long-term goal like a "New World Order." It is a conspiracy theory that simplifies complex global dynamics into a story of a single, malignant puppet master.

*Example: Proponents of the Theory of Global Secret Elites might claim that the 2008 financial crisis, the COVID-19 pandemic, and a major war are all orchestrated by the same group of bankers and oligarchs to depopulate the planet and establish a totalitarian world government—a narrative that connects disparate, complex events into a single, sinister plot.*

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 4, 2026

Theory of Secret Power Groups

A more pluralistic and less monolithic version of the "Global Elites" theory. It suggests the world is shaped by the covert competition and occasional collaboration of multiple hidden power groups: international finance networks, old aristocratic bloodlines, secret societies (like Skull and Bones), organized crime syndicates, and ideological cults. The world stage is their chessboard, and nations are their pieces.

Theory of Secret Power Groups Example: In this Theory, the rise of a tech mogul might be attributed not to genius, but to backing from a Secret Power Group of Silicon Valley venture capitalists with ties to intelligence agencies, using him as a proxy to control data and social networks, while a rival group of old-money industrialists tries to sabotage him.

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 4, 2026

Theory of Secret Power Elites

A synthesis focusing on individuals rather than groups—a small set of ultra-wealthy, well-connected people (like certain billionaire financiers or media moguls) who, through discreet salons, private islands, and philanthropic networks, form a social class that operates above national loyalties to shape policy, culture, and markets for their own benefit. They are "secret" not because no one knows their names, but because the true extent and coordination of their influence is hidden.

Example: The annual Bilderberg Meeting, a private conference of Western elites, is often cited as evidence for the Theory of Secret Power Elites. While attendees are known, the closed-door discussions are not. The theory holds that consensuses formed there later manifest as policy across multiple governments, regardless of which party is publicly in power.

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 4, 2026