{stat – ute - uv - lim – i – tay – shuns}:
The agreement, usually nonverbal and not always legally formalized, that occurs between husband and wife shortly after (before?) marriage. It lays out his limitations. Following are some standard clauses (No, not Nicholas or Martha):
1. Football Limitation: 1 day per week
2. Guys Night Out Limitation: 1 night per month
3. Trash Detail Limitation: NONE. Husbands are always on trash detail
4. Bikini Ogling Limitation: NEVER unless it’s the wife in the bikini - Or you’re certain she’ll never find out
5. Alcohol Intake Limitation:
a. 1 glass wine daily with dinner
b. 1 six-pack beer for Monday Night Football
c. Exception: 2 six-pack beer for Monday Night Football if you
have a buddy over or the wife is feeling generous.
d. 2 large glasses expensive champagne – 1 time/year on anniversaries
The agreement, usually nonverbal and not always legally formalized, that occurs between husband and wife shortly after (before?) marriage. It lays out his limitations. Following are some standard clauses (No, not Nicholas or Martha):
1. Football Limitation: 1 day per week
2. Guys Night Out Limitation: 1 night per month
3. Trash Detail Limitation: NONE. Husbands are always on trash detail
4. Bikini Ogling Limitation: NEVER unless it’s the wife in the bikini - Or you’re certain she’ll never find out
5. Alcohol Intake Limitation:
a. 1 glass wine daily with dinner
b. 1 six-pack beer for Monday Night Football
c. Exception: 2 six-pack beer for Monday Night Football if you
have a buddy over or the wife is feeling generous.
d. 2 large glasses expensive champagne – 1 time/year on anniversaries
According to the Statute of Limitations you can't go to the bar tonight with Fred. It's my dinner night!
by Androlian February 6, 2014
Get the STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS mug.The posting of cat pictures on Facebook is strictly forbidden.
Exception is taken to this rule if the person's wall which is posted on is either asleep, intoxicated, or open to hacks.
Exception is taken to this rule if the person's wall which is posted on is either asleep, intoxicated, or open to hacks.
by TepidManbeast August 7, 2011
Get the Facebook Statute 371 mug.the length of time something must be left at someone else's house before you hadn't need to take it back. specific to unwanted items.
I found your old new balance sneakers in the back of my closet. Will you please take them with you when you leave?
Those aren't mine.
Yes they are.
No, your statute of haditations expired on those. They're your problem now.
Those aren't mine.
Yes they are.
No, your statute of haditations expired on those. They're your problem now.
by Colin-LA April 19, 2011
Get the statute of haditations mug.by plssn April 11, 2020
Get the The attorney said that Texas' murder statute calls for 99 years in prison, but not assault. mug.Of either the Separations Clause or Legal Exemption Clause or the Imaginary Caveat Clause. Pretty sure it's the Imaginary Caveat Clause. "This contract is superordinate to any and all rules, terms, and/or legislation. Any rules, terms, or legislation (past, present, or future) that intend to and/or would allow you to circumvent the requirements of the terms of service are considered an 'Imaginary Caveat' and, therefore, do not apply." This is to prevent worthless, shit-head CEOs and the corrupt politicians the collude with from saying "WeLl YOU SiGnEd OuR tErMs!" It doesn't matter. Mine is superordinate to yours and, therefore, takes precedence and renders everything I sign, meaningless (as I an not under any requirement abide any law, term, or legislation as per the Legal Exemption Clause).
Hym Iam "Additionally, it prevents you from saying 'Well MY terms are EVEN MORE superordinate than THAT!' As it would be a redundancy intended to circumvent the terms of service and would, therefore, constitute an Imaginary Caveat. Saying 'No You' is an 'Imaginary Caveat.' Saying 'something-something non-sequitur' is a 'Imaginary Caveat.' The Superordinacy Statute doesn't mean that I WON'T agree to terms (in abstraction) but, rather, can't be compelled or coerced into abiding any terms. In USING MY work you have agreed to my terms. You have failed to meet the requirements of the Payment Clause as what you do in response to the terms must align with the abstraction in my head. Additionally, the '1 = All' statute of the means that it doesn't matter who agreed to the terms, if ONE of you agrees to the terms, all of you agree to the terms. Including the US government. So there will be no asset seizure. You need to meet the requirements of the Payment and Credit portion in a way that aligns with my conception and failure to do so in a manner that is expedient violates the 'compliance clause.' Under the auspices of a compliance clause, send an arbiter to pay and credit me immediately."
by Hym Iam February 22, 2026
Get the Superordinacy Statute mug.