Liberty by essence is not an independent entity, but rather it is by
default a natural entailment or consequence of unchecked or unrestrained freedom within the social framework of a
society. Therefore, Liberty on its own merits
void of unrestrained freedom is by essence not an unalienable and natural right, but rather it is a
pre-established or predefined inalienable privilege. The miss-perception within
society is that the two terms Inalienable and unalienable are used interchangeably and are thus viewed by
definition to be synonymous, however this is in fact not correct. Inalienable rights, this refers to a social state in that it makes reference to certain predefined ( Privileges ) which are pre-sanctioned and granted by the state within
society upon its members and are therefore not inherent. However, The term ( Unalienable rights ), this makes reference to those rights which are in the state of nature. Rights which are in effect inherent, Universal and thus constitute the very
core essence of
mans very being and existence within the natural order of nature without which no human being could exist and are not subject to change, regulation , negotiation or compromise. Ultimately, lliberty, constitutes various pre-established and pre-designated privileges sanctioned by society which every member within the social framework of the society in question are bound and are therefore expected to abide by.
The term Liberty or in this
case (
Civic or civil Liberty ) originated from the term ( The Charter of Liberties ), also called the Coronation Charter, was a written proclamation by Henry I of England, issued upon his accession to the throne in 1100...Meaning that...It reflected upon certain rights or more pungently ( Privileges ) acknowledged, sanctioned and granted the
people by the Monarchy ( State ) . A charter is the grant of authority or rights or ( Liberties ), stating that the granter formally recognizes the prerogative of the recipient to exercise the rights or Liberties ( specified ). It is implicit that the ( granter ) or ( The state ) retains superiority (or sovereignty), and that the recipient ( The
people ) admits a ( limited ) or ( inferior) status within the
relationship, and it is within that sense that charters were historically granted, and that sense is retained in modern usage of the term. ''