It's simple enough, if you seal up the leaks, your relationship will be airtight again, it wont be open. If your landlord or counselor or outside person died, you'd have nobody to seal the leaks but you and your other half. Everything happens for a reason, you're with somebody for a reason, you meet somebody for a reason, it's not a bunch of dumb luck or bad luck.
Not everything needs to be loosened in life, things fall apart that way. An open relationship is one of them.
by Solid Mantis October 7, 2020
Get the Open relationship mug.A mooching family-member who uses reverse-nepotism (i.e., instead of Person A's extending undeserved favors to Person B just because Person B is related to him, Person B pressures Person A to excessively favor him due to family ties) in an attempt to get you to purchase non-vital items for him.
Ethan Couch's parents were way too indulgent of him financially, and so he became a totally spoiled brat who expected ALL fellow humans to cater to his wishes, whether they were his buyological relatives or not.
by QuacksO November 15, 2020
Get the buyological relative mug.Related Words
Significantly-less-than-totally-cordial/peaceable feelings among two or more different countries, wherein da leaders and/or citizens of said empires are snapping and grinding their teeth in suppressed rage at da perceived unfairnesses and/or idiocies of their neighboring territories' populations.
Tronald Dump is behaving so arrogantly and unrealistically regarding da citizens and economies on both domestic and foreign soil dat he has created some really acrid intergnashional relations.
by QuacksO November 24, 2020
Get the intergnashional relations mug.Similar to Ken Wilber's "Pre/trans fallacy", which is about conflating pre-rational views with trans-rational views, the Relative/absolute fallacy is about conflating relative perspectives with The Absolute perspective. This is the main source of confusion in the forms of spirituality that deal with the implications of non-duality (Oneness).
There are generally two levels to the fallacy:
1. The first level is the conflation that happens when you don't have knowledge about the distinction between the relative and The Absolute (dual/non-dual). This is common in pre-rational religious people (Wilber). The way that traditional religion interprets various holy texts is itself a good example.
2. The second level happens when you do have knowledge about the distinction between relative and absolute (but it's obviously not complete knowledge). This is common in (aspiring) trans-rational people. A common example is to think that because nothing ultimately really matters, morality doesn't matter, and therefore it's fine to for example hurt other people. This is to conflate "the relative" with "The Absolute". From The Absolute perspective, yes, nothing really matters, but morality can only ever be defined "relative" to a certain value system in the first place. By taking the absolute perspective, you're deliberately stepping outside of all value systems, but "it's fine to hurt other people" would be a moral statement, which means you're actually invoking a relative perspective.
There are generally two levels to the fallacy:
1. The first level is the conflation that happens when you don't have knowledge about the distinction between the relative and The Absolute (dual/non-dual). This is common in pre-rational religious people (Wilber). The way that traditional religion interprets various holy texts is itself a good example.
2. The second level happens when you do have knowledge about the distinction between relative and absolute (but it's obviously not complete knowledge). This is common in (aspiring) trans-rational people. A common example is to think that because nothing ultimately really matters, morality doesn't matter, and therefore it's fine to for example hurt other people. This is to conflate "the relative" with "The Absolute". From The Absolute perspective, yes, nothing really matters, but morality can only ever be defined "relative" to a certain value system in the first place. By taking the absolute perspective, you're deliberately stepping outside of all value systems, but "it's fine to hurt other people" would be a moral statement, which means you're actually invoking a relative perspective.
You're conflating relative perspectives with The Absolute perspective ("The Relative/Absolute Fallacy").
Albert thinks he is God and nobody else is. Albert has committed the Relative/Absolute Fallacy.
Albert thinks he is God and nobody else is. Albert has committed the Relative/Absolute Fallacy.
by Carich99 December 23, 2020
Get the The Relative/absolute fallacy mug.by Big 16 inch futa pp March 4, 2021
Get the Game Related mug.A relationship in which one partner has to pay the other in order to be in a romantic or platonic relationship with them. It can be a one-time payment or a subscription; it depends on the partner.
“Stacey and I are in a paytonic relationship. She’s great, but it sucks that I have to fork over $50 every month.”
by Mhm mhm mhm hi March 5, 2021
Get the paytonic relationship mug.by PolyFlex May 3, 2021
Get the MD relationship mug.