Mutually clusive

/ˈmju tʃʊəli klu sɪv/

Mutually clusive is a given class of 2 sectors of math, in which they are interrelated

(a) In probability, the mutually clusive space or events is the space present outside the sample space, expressed as ξ', ∪', Ω' and/or S'. Finding the probability of selecting the mutually clusive space is always 0, as it is not in the sample space, but n(U') is dependent on n(U) due to context. There is always mutually clusive space regardless of whether the events inside are mutually inclusive, exclusive, independent or dependent.

(b) In statistics, the mutually clusive space defines the population (or census) not selected in the sample. Again, the mutually clusive space is dependent on the sample due to context. It is almost impossible to accurately measure the mutually clusive space and thus the census due to the possibility of more and more people, animals or objects becoming eligible for the census.

1. n(U') = n(C) - n(U) where U' is the mutually clusive space, "C" is the census or population not included in the sample space and U is the sample space.
2. The census of worded colours in the visible spectrum are Red, Orange, Yellow, Green, Blue, Indigo and Violet, yet due to the fact that you can read between the lines and pick out colors in the spontaneously existent mutually clusive space such as Cyan and Ochre, this is merely a sample of the many worded colours of the visible spectrum.

by Anonymous 298734927384723 September 20, 2025

to fuel a mutually beneficial relationship

a) to see eye-to-eye
b) to reach a common level of understanding, whether in terms of intimacy or otherwise

if you want to properly communicate with someone, and avoid conflict, you need to start by learning how to learn how to fuel a mutually beneficial relationship

by Sexydimma December 26, 2014

We're not mutually weaponizing things

Yeah, I'm not weaponizing things. This is your hyperfixation on the nomenclature I'm using to avoid having to address the substance of what I'm saying.

Hym "We're not mutually weaponizing things so, here, let's make this as simple as possible. When Ben and the fat blonde are doing a skit on their way out the door, are they making unwanted remarks about my personal life in the workplace? Yes. When Randall James Bowker say 'it IS too small' is that a reference to 15 years ago when he said they same thing at a Wendy's? Yes. Is that what the state would call 'harassment?' Yes. Am I being single out for that? Yes. Does that resemble the delusions of reference commonly associated with schizophrenia? Yes. Was that happening at the group home as well? Yes. Is it happening to other people? Likely. Looks like it from afar. Hard to tell. But people are clearly being evasive about it. Did they murder children, kill themselves or other, and or get misdiagnosed as a result? Is YES that is called 'me being right!' Good job me. Totally called it. And now, we have to sit here while an incest cult zealot tries to prove me wrong about everything else because she mangled an investigation she was too stupid to be involved in to deal with her grief about the fact that ME being right and her not confirming that was directly responsible for all of those things happening. Do you expect me to do it myself? Because I'm not going to. You just do the thing I said."

by Hym Iam December 17, 2025