Rosie Lawson is a creature that lives in her bedroom all day long making TikTok where she shows off her amazing dance moves and good looks. She’s such a sexy bitchhhhh 🤤🤤🤤🤤🤤
by Rosiefan17 April 29, 2022
Get the Rosie Lawson mug.Nobody has lived to tell the tale of d'Argeavel's 3 Laws of Math, (READ ON AT YOUR OWN RISK)
Law 1: Arithmetic of Commutative Associative.
Law 2: Distributive hard Fractal.
Law 3: "Do I have to call home today because all you have accomplished is writing a dick and balls in someone else's book"
Law 1: Arithmetic of Commutative Associative.
Law 2: Distributive hard Fractal.
Law 3: "Do I have to call home today because all you have accomplished is writing a dick and balls in someone else's book"
Him: "Hey Broskie, do you know what a Distributive hard Fractal is?"
Her: "Well, of course, I in fact follow d'Argeavel's 3 Laws of Math"
Him: "Wow, you lived to tell the tale?"
Her: "Wanna get juice?"
Her: "Well, of course, I in fact follow d'Argeavel's 3 Laws of Math"
Him: "Wow, you lived to tell the tale?"
Her: "Wanna get juice?"
by d'Argeavel's 3 Laws of Math June 14, 2021
Get the d'Argeavel's 3 Laws of Math mug.Related Words
Lawson
• lampshade
• lampshading
• Lawsuit
• LAWP
• lapse
• Lawgs
• Lawsoned
• lampsexual
• lawesome
SUS According to all known laws of aviation, there is no way a bee should be able to fly. Its wings are too small to get its fat little body off the ground. The bee, of course, flies anyway because bees don't care what humans think is impossible.
by Big_Sussy_Amogus October 14, 2021
Get the According to all known laws of aviation, there is no way a bee should be able to fly. Its wings are too small to get its fat little body off the ground. The bee, of course, flies anyway because bees don't care what humans think is impossible. mug.To purposely mention and point out a distracting cliche in your work, and then to move on like nothing happened. Used to have the audience of your work be less likely to murder you for using the cliche.
"Writer: 'The world was overrun by vampire robot zombies, what else would it be? Anyways the vampire robot zombies were defeated by a guy with a whole bunch of guns, silver bullets too. And a garlic flavored wooden stake Electromagnetic Pulse antivirus firing machine. Seriously that made it so easy. Anyways yeah there were a bunch of explosions. Fuck yeah!'
Reader: What a Lampshade Hanging sunufabitch. It's funny because he pointed it out."
Reader: What a Lampshade Hanging sunufabitch. It's funny because he pointed it out."
by Tekwerk September 6, 2010
Get the Lampshade Hanging mug.The act of being brutally and apathetically destroyed in 3 seconds or less by a rogue in World of Warcraft. This expression is well known amongst horde players on the Gorgonnash realm who have all, at one point or another, been helplessly obliterated by the alliance rogue Lawson.
Level 60 Cloth wearer, probably a warlock: Dude some rogue just WTFPWNED me in the orgimmar bank!
Cool, well-informed Horde player: Yeah dude you just got Lawsowned.
Cool, well-informed Horde player: Yeah dude you just got Lawsowned.
by eatabeef October 10, 2005
Get the Lawsowned mug.when you're taking a shit and after the first log has dropped you experience a moment of paused defecation before the second log drops
by Skawt Ef January 5, 2008
Get the lapse in fudgement mug.From observation, recognising that the general standard of television in my opinion has deteriorated and continues to do so year by year, so much so I now watch very little, I’ve found as far as the programme quality and content on all television channels, the following Doghouse's Laws of Television often apply.
I started compiling this list several years ago and some of these "laws" are now occasionally mentioned by contributors to a specific TV network message board, though of course they can apply to any channel.
I'm sure other contributors may relate to some of them and can think of other examples of practices which could be added to the list.
With a new programme, if your impression of it after ten minutes is that it's going to be rubbish, you’ll only be right 95% of the time.
The number of advance programme trails screened, will be in inverse proportion to the quality of the programme. The ”best bits” of any programme will be included in the trail.
The volume of background music will often be in inverse proportion to the amount of watchable activity on the screen at that time.
Any TV audience gets the standard of programmes it deserves. It’s no good complaining about the quality of a programme if you continue to watch it.
If an idea for a programme suggested to a TV network commissioning department isn’t another soap in one form or another, or requires an "in your face" presenter/auto-cutie, celebrities, judges, phone votes, or the inclusion of dysfunctional members of the public, it is unlikely to be made.
The number of programme presenters appearing at any one time, will usually be in inverse proportion to the quality of the programme.
The number and variety of similar programmes on TV, are likely to be in inverse proportion to their cost to present.
To reach the widest audience, in a programme where the subject is of a specific nature, it may include totally unrelated elements in an attempt to also “engage” viewers who aren’t the slightest bit interested in the actual topic, in a futile attempt to increase the ratings.
Some programmes, even a few news bulletins, given the level at which the programme makers pitch their production, should have the words; "for Dummies" added to the title.
If you've any doubts about watching a programme, from the trails or advertising you've seen, take a chance, give it a miss.
I started compiling this list several years ago and some of these "laws" are now occasionally mentioned by contributors to a specific TV network message board, though of course they can apply to any channel.
I'm sure other contributors may relate to some of them and can think of other examples of practices which could be added to the list.
With a new programme, if your impression of it after ten minutes is that it's going to be rubbish, you’ll only be right 95% of the time.
The number of advance programme trails screened, will be in inverse proportion to the quality of the programme. The ”best bits” of any programme will be included in the trail.
The volume of background music will often be in inverse proportion to the amount of watchable activity on the screen at that time.
Any TV audience gets the standard of programmes it deserves. It’s no good complaining about the quality of a programme if you continue to watch it.
If an idea for a programme suggested to a TV network commissioning department isn’t another soap in one form or another, or requires an "in your face" presenter/auto-cutie, celebrities, judges, phone votes, or the inclusion of dysfunctional members of the public, it is unlikely to be made.
The number of programme presenters appearing at any one time, will usually be in inverse proportion to the quality of the programme.
The number and variety of similar programmes on TV, are likely to be in inverse proportion to their cost to present.
To reach the widest audience, in a programme where the subject is of a specific nature, it may include totally unrelated elements in an attempt to also “engage” viewers who aren’t the slightest bit interested in the actual topic, in a futile attempt to increase the ratings.
Some programmes, even a few news bulletins, given the level at which the programme makers pitch their production, should have the words; "for Dummies" added to the title.
If you've any doubts about watching a programme, from the trails or advertising you've seen, take a chance, give it a miss.
by Doghouse Riley November 2, 2008
Get the Doghouse's Laws of Television mug.