Legiterally

Legiterally: something being so real that it's a mixture of legit and literally

The bread station is legiterally so awesome

by har.dyrt March 29, 2023

Legiterally

When something is literally legit.

I am “Legiterally” the happiest person on the planet!

by Steven James Jewel November 22, 2024

Legiterally

Legitimately and literally.

Person 1: Have you ever lost your phone and find out it’s been in your pocket the whole time?

Person 2: Not gonna lie, that legiterally happens to me every week lol

by KaliforniaKingBedMatress April 13, 2024

Logically Privileged Position

A position within a debate or discourse that is granted unearned authority—not because its arguments are stronger but because it's associated with dominant institutions, cultures, or power structures. A logically privileged position gets to define the terms of debate, set the standards of evidence, determine what counts as logical. Its claims are taken seriously by default; its opponents must work twice as hard to be heard. The logically privileged position doesn't have to prove itself; it's presumed valid until proven otherwise. This privilege is invisible to those who hold it—they just think they're being logical.

Logically Privileged Position Example: "In the debate, his position was logically privileged: he spoke from a prestigious university, cited mainstream sources, used familiar frameworks. Her position, from a marginalized community, using alternative sources, was constantly questioned. The privilege wasn't in his arguments; it was in his position. He didn't have to work to be heard; she did."

by Abzugal February 21, 2026

Logically Correct

A social and rhetorical stance where logical form—validity, syllogistic structure, freedom from informal fallacies—is elevated to the highest standard of discourse, and any deviation is treated as a moral or intellectual failure. Adherents police language not for harm but for “illogic,” often dismissing arguments based on perceived violations of formal reasoning while ignoring context, power dynamics, or lived experience. “Logically correct” becomes a gatekeeping tool: those who cannot frame their concerns in syllogisms are dismissed as irrational, and any emotional or embodied knowledge is automatically suspect. It mirrors political correctness in its zeal for orthodoxy but replaces social justice with logical purity.

Example: “She described her experience of workplace discrimination; he responded by dissecting her narrative for ‘hasty generalizations.’ He wasn’t engaging—he was being logically correct, using the tools of logic to silence testimony.”

by Dumu The Void April 1, 2026

legiterally

It’s a mix of legit and literally so when someone says something foolish or like just in any situation u can say it.

today I was walking to school and someone legiterally came up to me and offered me a ride.

by Marcgouieva April 3, 2026

It logically follows

That if you in a war you should be able to expell the people who lost from the area? To where? All of the land is occupied by sovereign nations. You win a war so now you have the right to impose 2.1 million refugees on the countries around you? That's kind of conceptually adject to the argument Douglarse Murray's stupid ass made about why no one else wants to take the Palestinians. Would ANY country take in 2.1 million unvetted immigrants? Ever? For any reason? No question asked? "We don't want these people to live here anymore and God told us that we're cosmically entitled to a country where we're an ethnic majority so... Somebody else has to take them... Or we get to do whatever we want with them... And if they don't stop fighting we need get to kill them all..."

Hym "Maybe it logically follows in the absence of 3rd parties but they 'won a war' with the assistance of 3rd parties against a less advanced population and are sustained by 3rd parties indefinitely. There's international law and universal human rights to consider. Is they weren't beholden to 3rd parties and it happened in a vaccum it wouldn't be a matter of whether or not the had the right they just WOULD do whatever they wanted. But it wouldn't necessarily be a right that's been instantiated. I know your argument is not 'If you're sovereign over an area you can expel whoever you want' Can the U.S. just decide to expel all the black people? The crime rate is too high in inner cities. They're too violent. Their culture is incompatible so we have to get right of them. And if they ever attack white dominant cities we can just start bombing Chicago. Why do people think you're good at debating? OH! Right, retard-world. Hey, where's your wife? And I see you're on team 'Be unconditionally nice to retards and women or I get to do whatever I want to you' and I can still just murder some kids and kill myself bitch. Let it go. You don't give a shit about that retard."

by Hym Iam February 23, 2024