1. 180 or so year-old American political party. It has, throughout its time, either supported, or had representatives which supported, gay marriage, abortion, the war with Iraq, American involvement in the Vietnam War, slavery, ignorance to national racism and discrimination, etc.
2. People who vote for the Democratic Party. They tend to know little about politics, and are led by their noses by buzzwords and propaganda, and a slight yearning to do whats "right", which includes taking the life away from something that, 99% of the time (the other 1% is a cushion saved for stillborns), is going, and I mean going, to be be a human, even with safe haven laws present in about 45 states.
2. People who vote for the Democratic Party. They tend to know little about politics, and are led by their noses by buzzwords and propaganda, and a slight yearning to do whats "right", which includes taking the life away from something that, 99% of the time (the other 1% is a cushion saved for stillborns), is going, and I mean going, to be be a human, even with safe haven laws present in about 45 states.
-Andrew Johnson
-Lyndon B Johnson
-John Kerry
"Democrat, Republican...why am I repeating myself?"
"Why did you vote for John Kerry?"
"Because he's not George Bush."
-Lyndon B Johnson
-John Kerry
"Democrat, Republican...why am I repeating myself?"
"Why did you vote for John Kerry?"
"Because he's not George Bush."
by talkingmouth February 18, 2006
by talkingmouth August 10, 2006
1. The softest, squishiest, warmest, most perfect thing imaginable. And guess what? They come in pairs :)
2. The cause of all of life's problems.
3. The solution to all of life's problems.
2. The cause of all of life's problems.
3. The solution to all of life's problems.
1. She led my hand to her boob, and I had a new best friend; soon I had a new second-best friend.
2. She flashed her boobs and caused that car crash.
3. ...but once I touched her boob, I forgot all about her face.
2. She flashed her boobs and caused that car crash.
3. ...but once I touched her boob, I forgot all about her face.
by talkingmouth March 04, 2006
A philosophy based on extreme skepticism. In it's most basic form (Before it was clouded by ideas involving politics, social rhetoric, sex, drugs, rock and roll etc.), which we can refer to as "epistemological nihilism", simply denies the possibility of knowledge of truth. Previous epistemological philosophies failed in obtaining truth because all possible vessels for obtaining truth cannot be proven truthful themselves. Empiricism fails because one must assume that their senses depict an accurate portrayal of their secular existence (or that a secular world even exists, for that matter), which fuels their observations; sensations also depend on senses to provide the observer with the source of the sensation. Rationalism fails because without a secular experience, real or imaginary, one's lack of experience prevents them from being able to reason. ie, they cannot reason without the use of empirical devices. Therefore, rationalism cannot gain one knowledge without empirical methods, which are already based on assumptions (faith) of senses; assumptions cannot lead to the knowledge of truth. Intuitionalism fails because it also has the potential to utilize empirical (and rational) devices; It allows one to alter their truth based on new experiences. This leaves room for "error" and keeps "truth" from being absolute or even certain.
Empiricist: Can't you see the truth?
Person: No, I'm blind.
Rationalist: I think, therefore I am.
Person: You used speech to make that proclamation; One must use sight or hearing to interpret.
Nihilist: Nothing can be certain.
Person: You can't prove that.
Nihilist: You're catching on.
Nihilism is the only epistemological philosophy worth following.
Person: No, I'm blind.
Rationalist: I think, therefore I am.
Person: You used speech to make that proclamation; One must use sight or hearing to interpret.
Nihilist: Nothing can be certain.
Person: You can't prove that.
Nihilist: You're catching on.
Nihilism is the only epistemological philosophy worth following.
by talkingmouth May 02, 2006
A philosophy based on extreme skepticism. In it's most basic form (Before it was clouded by ideas involving politics, social rhetoric, sex, drugs, rock and roll etc.), which we can refer to as "epistemological nihilism", simply denies the possibility of knowledge of truth. Previous epistemological philosophies failed in obtaining truth because all possible vessels for obtaining truth cannot be proven truthful themselves. Empiricism fails because one must assume that their senses depict an accurate portrayal of their secular existence (or that a secular world even exists, for that matter), which fuels their observations; sensations also depend on senses to provide the observer with the source of the sensation. Rationalism fails because without a secular experience, real or imaginary, one's lack of experience prevents them from being able to reason. ie, they cannot reason without the use of empirical devices. Therefore, rationalism cannot gain one knowledge without empirical methods, which are already based on assumptions (faith) of senses; assumptions cannot lead to the knowledge of truth. Intuitionalism fails because it also has the potential to utilize empirical (and rational) devices; It allows one to alter their truth based on new experiences. This leaves room for "error" and keeps "truth" from being absolute or even certain.
Empiricist: Can't you see the truth?
Person: No, I'm blind.
Rationalist: I think, therefore I am.
Person: You used speech to make that proclamation; One must use sight or hearing to interpret.
Nihilist: Nothing can be certain.
Person: You can't prove that.
Nihilist: You're catching on.
Nihilism is the only epistemological philosophy worth following.
Person: No, I'm blind.
Rationalist: I think, therefore I am.
Person: You used speech to make that proclamation; One must use sight or hearing to interpret.
Nihilist: Nothing can be certain.
Person: You can't prove that.
Nihilist: You're catching on.
Nihilism is the only epistemological philosophy worth following.
by talkingmouth April 18, 2006
by talkingmouth April 30, 2006