optical_epilepsy's definitions
To lose an argument, or sound stupid when trying to say something because you spoke first, or the person you are arguing against is unreasonably stupid, a bigot or a dissentomatic
Sarah: Lowering taxes will save taxpayers money
Douchebag: No it won't because lowering taxes will raise the national debt, dumbass.
Sarah: What does national debt have to do with how much money taxpayers are saved?
Douchebag: So it won't raise the national debt? You sound stupid, fucking retard hahaha. Sarah is so fucking stupid she seriously thinks that lowering taxes won't raise the national debt.
Sarah: (pulls out pistol)
Narrator: Before First 48 filmed the subsequent murder, Sarah was proclamaimed by the Douchebag
Douchebag: No it won't because lowering taxes will raise the national debt, dumbass.
Sarah: What does national debt have to do with how much money taxpayers are saved?
Douchebag: So it won't raise the national debt? You sound stupid, fucking retard hahaha. Sarah is so fucking stupid she seriously thinks that lowering taxes won't raise the national debt.
Sarah: (pulls out pistol)
Narrator: Before First 48 filmed the subsequent murder, Sarah was proclamaimed by the Douchebag
by Optical_Epilepsy December 11, 2011
Get the proclamaimed mug.Somebody who is always willing to text you back. These are people you text when your doing something you don't really wanna do but have to do it (school, work, etc) and it would be very nice if somebody would keep texting you back instead of having to wait minutes-hours at a time
by Optical_Epilepsy June 28, 2010
Get the reliable texter mug.Jacob: I wish people would stop abusing welfare
Jesse: So your saying all people who use welfare automatically will abuse it?
Jacob: Obviously not Jesse... Stop assumptacking me...
Jesse: So then exactly what are you saying?
Jacob: (sighs) Fine I'll repeat myself: I wish people would stop abusing welfare
Jesse: Oh so just because there poor and need welfare means they want to make other people suffer right?
Narrator: Jesse thinks he is making a point by being very assumptive and jumping to conclusions. He's really just being a douchebag and trying to make Jacob feel bad for his opinion. He better hope Jacob thinks carefully and doesn't reach for the knife...
Jesse: So your saying all people who use welfare automatically will abuse it?
Jacob: Obviously not Jesse... Stop assumptacking me...
Jesse: So then exactly what are you saying?
Jacob: (sighs) Fine I'll repeat myself: I wish people would stop abusing welfare
Jesse: Oh so just because there poor and need welfare means they want to make other people suffer right?
Narrator: Jesse thinks he is making a point by being very assumptive and jumping to conclusions. He's really just being a douchebag and trying to make Jacob feel bad for his opinion. He better hope Jacob thinks carefully and doesn't reach for the knife...
by Optical_Epilepsy June 5, 2011
Get the assumptacking mug.Proof that Sony is getting desperate, does not have any sort of honor, and can't be original anymore. In case you could not tell, the Playstation Move is nothing more than a Wiimote with a ball on top. It's as close to copyright infringment as you can get.
by Optical_Epilepsy June 5, 2011
Get the Playstation Move mug.This is when somebody argues by DEFLECTING anything said against them.
They will NEVER address any issues brought against them or their point but will instantly bring something else up to change the subject
Deflective racists use this tactic whenever a situation/fact is brought up that goes against there beliefs
People do this because they know damn well if they try to address the issue or stay relevant to it, there entire argument will get derailed
They will NEVER address any issues brought against them or their point but will instantly bring something else up to change the subject
Deflective racists use this tactic whenever a situation/fact is brought up that goes against there beliefs
People do this because they know damn well if they try to address the issue or stay relevant to it, there entire argument will get derailed
deflective arguing
by Optical_Epilepsy July 20, 2010
Get the deflective arguing mug.When you send somebody a text message and they do not reply within 24 hours there is a 95% chance that they readeleted your text and have willfully chosen not to reply
There is a less than 5% chance that they have lost their phone/phone was stolen, have been busy for a full 24 hours (so they couldn't even use their phone for 5 seconds, cause that's all it takes) or sent the message but the "delivery failed".
If it has been 24 hours and they have not replied, that's when you begin the 7 day reply test to confirm whether they want to text you or not.
There is a less than 5% chance that they have lost their phone/phone was stolen, have been busy for a full 24 hours (so they couldn't even use their phone for 5 seconds, cause that's all it takes) or sent the message but the "delivery failed".
If it has been 24 hours and they have not replied, that's when you begin the 7 day reply test to confirm whether they want to text you or not.
Dan: Why have you been looking at your phone so much?
Steve: I'm waiting on Leann to reply
Dan: How long has it been since u sent her a text?
Steve: More than 24 hours.....
Dan: Don't you know the 24 hour reply rule? She more than likely readeleted your text man, do the 7 day reply test to see if she really wants to text you
Steve: I'm waiting on Leann to reply
Dan: How long has it been since u sent her a text?
Steve: More than 24 hours.....
Dan: Don't you know the 24 hour reply rule? She more than likely readeleted your text man, do the 7 day reply test to see if she really wants to text you
by Optical_Epilepsy September 3, 2010
Get the 24 hour reply rule mug.This is a test performed on somebody who is not replying to your text messages or has broken the 24 hour reply rule.
The test is to wait a MINIMUM OF 168 HOURS (this is very important) after the last time you sent them a text, and then send them a very universal conversation starter.
If they break the 24 hour reply rule again, then you have proven that they do not want to text you. That's because the chance of them coincidentally not having 15 seconds of time to reply to your text in 2 24 hour periods that are a week apart (assuming they have access and service to their phone) is less than 1 in a billion.
The only possible way this can be the case is if their phone is physically removed from their possession or destroyed. Although this is quite possible, if you keep in touch with the person through other means (facebook, myspace, or especially a face to face conversation) you can find out for sure.
The test is to wait a MINIMUM OF 168 HOURS (this is very important) after the last time you sent them a text, and then send them a very universal conversation starter.
If they break the 24 hour reply rule again, then you have proven that they do not want to text you. That's because the chance of them coincidentally not having 15 seconds of time to reply to your text in 2 24 hour periods that are a week apart (assuming they have access and service to their phone) is less than 1 in a billion.
The only possible way this can be the case is if their phone is physically removed from their possession or destroyed. Although this is quite possible, if you keep in touch with the person through other means (facebook, myspace, or especially a face to face conversation) you can find out for sure.
Peter: Damn this girl ain't texting me back, wow
Steve: Has it been 24 hours since you last texted her?
Peter: Yea, why?
Steve: Do the 7 day reply test, wait a week and send her a conversation starter if she doesn't reply 24 hours after that then her phone must be lost/stolen/broken or she ain't tryna text you
Steve: Has it been 24 hours since you last texted her?
Peter: Yea, why?
Steve: Do the 7 day reply test, wait a week and send her a conversation starter if she doesn't reply 24 hours after that then her phone must be lost/stolen/broken or she ain't tryna text you
by Optical_Epilepsy September 3, 2010
Get the 7 day reply test mug.