optical_epilepsy's definitions
Somebody who is always willing to text you back. These are people you text when your doing something you don't really wanna do but have to do it (school, work, etc) and it would be very nice if somebody would keep texting you back instead of having to wait minutes-hours at a time
by Optical_Epilepsy June 28, 2010
Get the reliable textermug. Jacob: I wish people would stop abusing welfare
Jesse: So your saying all people who use welfare automatically will abuse it?
Jacob: Obviously not Jesse... Stop assumptacking me...
Jesse: So then exactly what are you saying?
Jacob: (sighs) Fine I'll repeat myself: I wish people would stop abusing welfare
Jesse: Oh so just because there poor and need welfare means they want to make other people suffer right?
Narrator: Jesse thinks he is making a point by being very assumptive and jumping to conclusions. He's really just being a douchebag and trying to make Jacob feel bad for his opinion. He better hope Jacob thinks carefully and doesn't reach for the knife...
Jesse: So your saying all people who use welfare automatically will abuse it?
Jacob: Obviously not Jesse... Stop assumptacking me...
Jesse: So then exactly what are you saying?
Jacob: (sighs) Fine I'll repeat myself: I wish people would stop abusing welfare
Jesse: Oh so just because there poor and need welfare means they want to make other people suffer right?
Narrator: Jesse thinks he is making a point by being very assumptive and jumping to conclusions. He's really just being a douchebag and trying to make Jacob feel bad for his opinion. He better hope Jacob thinks carefully and doesn't reach for the knife...
by Optical_Epilepsy June 5, 2011
Get the assumptackingmug. When you argue with somebody and the other person gets his friends, family, etc to agree with him and disagree with you
This is really immature and pretty messed up because if you say 2+2=4 and he says 2+2=5 and then gets everybody to agree with him, you might be technically right but your still gonna be socially wrong
If you do this, it's because you can't accept being wrong and feel the need to be right about everything like your allergic to wrong. It's really not that bad unless you gotta be ego trippin. Just grow up and quit being a little kid
If your the victim of this your screwed and can't win the argument because 1 person will never convince 3 people that agree on the same thing against you, that there wrong. They think there right because they make up the majority
This is really immature and pretty messed up because if you say 2+2=4 and he says 2+2=5 and then gets everybody to agree with him, you might be technically right but your still gonna be socially wrong
If you do this, it's because you can't accept being wrong and feel the need to be right about everything like your allergic to wrong. It's really not that bad unless you gotta be ego trippin. Just grow up and quit being a little kid
If your the victim of this your screwed and can't win the argument because 1 person will never convince 3 people that agree on the same thing against you, that there wrong. They think there right because they make up the majority
Stan:2+2=4
Doug:2+2=5 dude your stupid. hey Jerry don't 2+2=5?
Jerry: Yea
Doug:Stan said it was 4 what an idiot
Jerry: Your wrong Stan
Stan: I would be right if I wasn't getting arguejumped
Doug:2+2=5 dude your stupid. hey Jerry don't 2+2=5?
Jerry: Yea
Doug:Stan said it was 4 what an idiot
Jerry: Your wrong Stan
Stan: I would be right if I wasn't getting arguejumped
by Optical_Epilepsy July 23, 2010
Get the arguejumpedmug. Proof that Sony is getting desperate, does not have any sort of honor, and can't be original anymore. In case you could not tell, the Playstation Move is nothing more than a Wiimote with a ball on top. It's as close to copyright infringment as you can get.
by Optical_Epilepsy June 5, 2011
Get the Playstation Movemug. Somebody who takes an exaggeration, a figure of speech, or a hyperbole literally as a pathetic attempt to make you sound stupid
It's ironic though how when ever somebody tries to be one, after they rebuttal, all you can hear are crickets chirping
It's ironic though how when ever somebody tries to be one, after they rebuttal, all you can hear are crickets chirping
Normal Person: It's raining cats and dogs outside!
Hyperbodick: Animals can't fall from the sky you fucking moron! This faggot bitch cunt seriously thinks cats and dogs can fall from the sky, what a retard!
Normal Person: (pulls out pistol)
Hyperbodick: Animals can't fall from the sky you fucking moron! This faggot bitch cunt seriously thinks cats and dogs can fall from the sky, what a retard!
Normal Person: (pulls out pistol)
by Optical_Epilepsy December 10, 2011
Get the hyperbodickmug. When a person who normally spells everything correctly, using proper grammar and punctuation, decides to send messages that heavily use slang, shortened spelling (u instead of you,) and little if any punctuation so the person they are texting will stick around long enough to get to know them.
This is commonly used by men who are trying to get with woman who are attractive, but are not interested in men who come off as nerdy, proper, and useful to society.
ILLITERATED DEFINITION: w3n dey talk l1ke a c00l p3rson
This is commonly used by men who are trying to get with woman who are attractive, but are not interested in men who come off as nerdy, proper, and useful to society.
ILLITERATED DEFINITION: w3n dey talk l1ke a c00l p3rson
by Optical_Epilepsy April 2, 2011
Get the illiterated textingmug. This is a test performed on somebody who is not replying to your text messages or has broken the 24 hour reply rule.
The test is to wait a MINIMUM OF 168 HOURS (this is very important) after the last time you sent them a text, and then send them a very universal conversation starter.
If they break the 24 hour reply rule again, then you have proven that they do not want to text you. That's because the chance of them coincidentally not having 15 seconds of time to reply to your text in 2 24 hour periods that are a week apart (assuming they have access and service to their phone) is less than 1 in a billion.
The only possible way this can be the case is if their phone is physically removed from their possession or destroyed. Although this is quite possible, if you keep in touch with the person through other means (facebook, myspace, or especially a face to face conversation) you can find out for sure.
The test is to wait a MINIMUM OF 168 HOURS (this is very important) after the last time you sent them a text, and then send them a very universal conversation starter.
If they break the 24 hour reply rule again, then you have proven that they do not want to text you. That's because the chance of them coincidentally not having 15 seconds of time to reply to your text in 2 24 hour periods that are a week apart (assuming they have access and service to their phone) is less than 1 in a billion.
The only possible way this can be the case is if their phone is physically removed from their possession or destroyed. Although this is quite possible, if you keep in touch with the person through other means (facebook, myspace, or especially a face to face conversation) you can find out for sure.
Peter: Damn this girl ain't texting me back, wow
Steve: Has it been 24 hours since you last texted her?
Peter: Yea, why?
Steve: Do the 7 day reply test, wait a week and send her a conversation starter if she doesn't reply 24 hours after that then her phone must be lost/stolen/broken or she ain't tryna text you
Steve: Has it been 24 hours since you last texted her?
Peter: Yea, why?
Steve: Do the 7 day reply test, wait a week and send her a conversation starter if she doesn't reply 24 hours after that then her phone must be lost/stolen/broken or she ain't tryna text you
by Optical_Epilepsy September 3, 2010
Get the 7 day reply testmug.