flightfacilities's definitions
A philosopher who tried to solve the question of, if a tree falls in the forest; and no one hears it did, it make a sound?
More broadly Wittgenstein answered the question: Did language come from outside of pan-contiguity (the universe) or inside of pan-contiguity...
More broadly Wittgenstein answered the question: Did language come from outside of pan-contiguity (the universe) or inside of pan-contiguity...
Wittgenstein viewed language as a human ritual; and ritual as subject to game theory.
He introduced the concept of the external participant in contrast to physics' external observer. Thus, each participant becomes a part of embedded-language-in-the universe.
He introduced the concept of the external participant in contrast to physics' external observer. Thus, each participant becomes a part of embedded-language-in-the universe.
by flightfacilities May 13, 2022
Get the Wittgenstein mug.A zen koan is an attempt to answer the question of whether a tree-falling makes a sound if no one heard it.
A zen koan concludes that a tree falling can only make a sound if two or more people vocalize it AFTER THE FACT in the ritual of language.
This follows Vikaas's rule some things can only be verified in retrospect even if the participants were not actually there...
A zen koan concludes that a tree falling can only make a sound if two or more people vocalize it AFTER THE FACT in the ritual of language.
This follows Vikaas's rule some things can only be verified in retrospect even if the participants were not actually there...
Zen koan follows Wittgenstein's principle of language as a ritual; furthermore it confirms Vikaas's rule that the participating verifiers can come after the circumstantial fact...
The zen koan follows Wittgenstein's principle of the external participant; in contrast to the external observer in physics.
Because language is embedded in the universe as per Wittgenstein, simple discussion between two or more parties is enough to create MATERIAL fact; even if that materialization comes after the circumstance, per the Vikaas rule.
The zen koan follows Wittgenstein's principle of the external participant; in contrast to the external observer in physics.
Because language is embedded in the universe as per Wittgenstein, simple discussion between two or more parties is enough to create MATERIAL fact; even if that materialization comes after the circumstance, per the Vikaas rule.
by flightfacilities May 13, 2022
Get the zen Koan mug.The 1:1 relationship between the complex numbers wave-function collapses in the triene-function and the internal corners of the hypermodular Fauvic point.
The fear a woman had that her son will become a property owner.
The lines running between the wave-function collapses and the Fauvic corners are black.
The fear a woman had that her son will become a property owner.
The lines running between the wave-function collapses and the Fauvic corners are black.
Female anxiety is a mother's sexual fear about son.
The son will experience this anxiety as scarcity-in-a-supply-chain rather than competition in the mode-of-patriarchy.
The son will experience this anxiety as scarcity-in-a-supply-chain rather than competition in the mode-of-patriarchy.
by flightfacilities May 13, 2022
Get the female anxiety mug.Kantianism is a theory that argues that; in the mind; sense triumphs over the present moment. This is because consideration always requires counting; but counting does not always require consideration...
Kantianism argues that free will exists because the uncountable set of points in the Tarski-interior count themselves.
The countable set of points in a non-Tarski plane is provided by the sense-path (polynominalism). The uncountable set of points in a non-Tarski space is provided by sublumination from The Maya: this is the information from the present moment.
The uncountable set is able to count itself because of meta-nominalism the ability of numbers to count themselves or--more-locally-to-the-mind--precession--the 1:1 relationship between the interior-points of the non-Tarski space and the Fauvic spaces.
The countable set of points in a non-Tarski plane is provided by the sense-path (polynominalism). The uncountable set of points in a non-Tarski space is provided by sublumination from The Maya: this is the information from the present moment.
The uncountable set is able to count itself because of meta-nominalism the ability of numbers to count themselves or--more-locally-to-the-mind--precession--the 1:1 relationship between the interior-points of the non-Tarski space and the Fauvic spaces.
by flightfacilities May 12, 2022
Get the Kantianism mug.A dialectic in which, over the course of a non-Tarski space, an uncountable set of points called 'Tarski-interior points' yield to an infinite set of points entering the mind non-Tarski space or transfinite-space via supersymmetry.
The infinite set of points enters the transfinite (non-Tarski) space via poly-nominalism from super-symmetry; while the uncountable set exists in the Tarski-interior via sub-lumination uncountable movement from Maya.
In plain English--consideration (path-of-sense) wins over counting (momentous information) in the plane-of-the-mind.
The infinite set of points enters the transfinite (non-Tarski) space via poly-nominalism from super-symmetry; while the uncountable set exists in the Tarski-interior via sub-lumination uncountable movement from Maya.
In plain English--consideration (path-of-sense) wins over counting (momentous information) in the plane-of-the-mind.
Kantianism is a theory of free will in-the-mind.
It relies on an external device called 'aesthetic process judgement' or The Limina, called "forma-spinning."
It argues that; in the mind; sense triumphs over the present moment. This is because consideration is always counting; but counting is not always consideration.
The Kantian dialectic relies on an external device Kant called the 'thing-in-itself' or "free-will-in-itself."
It relies on an external device called 'aesthetic process judgement' or The Limina, called "forma-spinning."
It argues that; in the mind; sense triumphs over the present moment. This is because consideration is always counting; but counting is not always consideration.
The Kantian dialectic relies on an external device Kant called the 'thing-in-itself' or "free-will-in-itself."
by flightfacilities May 12, 2022
Get the Kantian Dialectic mug.The paradigm that consideration is a dialectic between the present moment & sense.
The idea that the mind is a dialectic between countable set of points brought by polynominalism (path-of-sense) and the uncountable (Tarski-exterior) set of points brought by the present moment The Maya to the non-Tarski space by the process of sublumination.
The idea that the mind is a dialectic between countable set of points brought by polynominalism (path-of-sense) and the uncountable (Tarski-exterior) set of points brought by the present moment The Maya to the non-Tarski space by the process of sublumination.
Kantian interpolation is a dialectic in which the senses win out via supersymmetry over the uncountable information provided by the present moment.
Put another way; the Kantian interpolation is an alternation between consideration & counting.
Kantian interpolation tells us that the mind is a battlefield between the present moment which provides an uncountable number of Tarski-points from the Maya and the senses which provide an infinite number of points to the non-Tarski space.
(The infinite set of points comes to non-Tarski space from supersymmetry via polynominalism.)
The Kantian approach hints that the infinite set of points win out in the human mind over the uncountable set of points through the process-of-aesthetic-judgment forma-spinning.
Thus: consideration wins out in the human mind; because counting is not alway consideration but consideration is always counting. Ie. the subconscious does not need the mind to count...
Put another way; the Kantian interpolation is an alternation between consideration & counting.
Kantian interpolation tells us that the mind is a battlefield between the present moment which provides an uncountable number of Tarski-points from the Maya and the senses which provide an infinite number of points to the non-Tarski space.
(The infinite set of points comes to non-Tarski space from supersymmetry via polynominalism.)
The Kantian approach hints that the infinite set of points win out in the human mind over the uncountable set of points through the process-of-aesthetic-judgment forma-spinning.
Thus: consideration wins out in the human mind; because counting is not alway consideration but consideration is always counting. Ie. the subconscious does not need the mind to count...
by flightfacilities May 12, 2022
Get the kantian interpolation mug.The point of hyper-irony which contains an uncountable number of internal corners and an infinite number of avatars (trans-meta points) on its exterior.
The interior corners are actually transitional colors (of uncountable number) and the shine-points are hypercolors.
The Fauvic point is transparency in a point.
The interior corners are actually transitional colors (of uncountable number) and the shine-points are hypercolors.
The Fauvic point is transparency in a point.
The Fauvic point describes the seat of meta-nihilism.
It is an uncountable number of Fauvic corners surrounded by an infinite number of hypercolors which are infinitely orthogonal to the line-of-neonihilism national deficit-value of debt backed currency.
It is an uncountable number of Fauvic corners surrounded by an infinite number of hypercolors which are infinitely orthogonal to the line-of-neonihilism national deficit-value of debt backed currency.
by flightfacilities May 12, 2022
Get the Fauvic point mug.