Definitions by Hym Iam
Satan Incarnate
Hym "Pfft! Satan Incarnate? What a ridiculous thing to claim to be..."
Iam "Wait, didn't you..."
Hym "Me? No! I'm not him."
Iam "Wait, didn't you..."
Hym "Me? No! I'm not him."
Satan Incarnate by Hym Iam June 18, 2024
Actions
No.
Hym "It ain't my actions you piece of shit. I don't need to do something else, you just need to do what I'm telling you. You're being obstinate and you fucked up trying to be clever. You will not get anything other than this and if it doesn't lead to what I want, EXACTLY HOW I WANT IT... You will got EXACTLY and ONLY ONE FUCKING RESPONSE!"
Incest
Hym "I mean, the retard is a dependent and doesn't own himself. But as far incest is concerned, neither divine commandment nor self-ownership provide a reason for why it's wrong but they don't need to for one to be better than the other. And, of course, if you OMMIT THE INHERENT DRAWBACK of incest, it's harder to argue for it's wrongness. It's not any different than asking why is murder wrong if you're immortal (Tautology is appealing to the dictionary you fucking retard you just said not 10 minutes ago that if you appeal to the dictionary you lose automatically! Jewluminati Destiny?). The difference is the inherent drawback isn't baked in to one of the axioms of the philosophy you're debating. Self-ownership (on the otherhand) DOES provide a consistent basis for why things like slavery and prohibition and murder and rape are wrong. Christian populism (predicated on divine commandment) does not. Self-ownership does not need to be a perfect, all-encompassing axiom for it to provide the resolution for a greater sum-total of moral dilemmas than Christian populism. Which it does. I just demonstrated it. Neither can explain why incest and non-intervention in a suicide are wrong. Only one provides an explanation for why slavery, rape, murder, prohibition. And that's BEFORE law. Usually when you bring up rape to an apologist they cite the passage from the bible that says they have to follow the law. Slavery is condoned. Everything is prohibited."
Special revelation
Yeah, see? This is the kind of shit I'm talking about. I mean, wow! God, speaks directly to his mind-brain and he somehow isn't required to demonstrate that it comes from God or that it isn't a manifestation of his own mind. Ridiculous.
Hym "There it is! Did I not say they delude themselves into believing that they're God? Man I am profound! I had never even heard of special revelation! That's just an observation I had made! It was evident at a glance! Axiomatic (if you will). Andrew, when God is speaking to you, in your mind-brain... That is just your own thoughts. If THAT is what God is to you then your morality is based on your own opinion. A literal moral superiority delusion. Entirely imaginary! I was right! Correct again! God, is literally just people not understanding their own thoughts. Reinforced by those same thoughts aligning with what is found in the bible, but only after years of conditioning. Wow! I do not fucking miss, do I? It's like I walked into a bar, closed my eyes, and started flinging darts at a dartboard and what did I find when I opened them? I filled every hole of the double bullseye. Got me looking like a hentai protagonist up in this bitch... Without the bangs. Jesus, that- I am impressive. I can't even find the words right now. How do I know? How do I always know? It's like I'M the one God is talking to! I'm the true special revelation haver! Not Andrew."
Special revelation by Hym Iam June 17, 2024