Geoooooooo's definitions
by Geoooooooo March 25, 2005
Get the thamug. Newspaper read by retards with a completely upside down world view who seem to find no inconsistency that they like the royal family but accuse immigrants of being freeloaders draining tax payers money. Who think Rich people's SUV-buying money is better where it is than giving asylum seekers a chance of a future or supporting sick people through the NHS. The daily mail's high readership and its poisonous influence on people's brains is the reason so many "populist" policies that the bloody tories love are hateful intollerent, unfair policies that make class divisions and suffering greater.
Daily Mail Reader: Oi DUH... Read this... DUHHH... Asylem seekers bad... DUHHHH... gypsys bad..DUHHHHH. People with funny skin colour bad... DUHHH... Thankyou Daily Mail! You stop My Brain hurting! Maybe asylum seekers why my brain hurt!!! Kill them all!!!!!
by Geoooooooo March 24, 2005
Get the daily mailmug. A feeling of unhappiness that someone else appears better off than us.
A completely natural human emotion which we all experience and which is only villified because of the haves continued attempt to maintain their position over the have nots. Let me explain:
Back in History:
Haves want to keep what they got Have nots want it. More Have nots than Haves so Haves in danger of facing rebellion.
Solution? Use their power over people minds through their control of religion (its a fact that rulling classes control religion for their own ends- think how the mediaeval abbots managed to get so rich and divine rights of king etc.) to make it seem as though wanting what you haven't got is evil. Therefore Have Nots believe them and stop wanting therefore no rebellion therefore Haves get to keep wealth.
In The present:
Less people religious but this universal belief of religions deeply inbedded in human psyche so most people still think its wrong to show natural Jealousy.
A completely natural human emotion which we all experience and which is only villified because of the haves continued attempt to maintain their position over the have nots. Let me explain:
Back in History:
Haves want to keep what they got Have nots want it. More Have nots than Haves so Haves in danger of facing rebellion.
Solution? Use their power over people minds through their control of religion (its a fact that rulling classes control religion for their own ends- think how the mediaeval abbots managed to get so rich and divine rights of king etc.) to make it seem as though wanting what you haven't got is evil. Therefore Have Nots believe them and stop wanting therefore no rebellion therefore Haves get to keep wealth.
In The present:
Less people religious but this universal belief of religions deeply inbedded in human psyche so most people still think its wrong to show natural Jealousy.
Thou shalt not envy(or some other old word I can't remember) thy neighbours Ass or their Wife or House or something like that.
by Geoooooooo March 26, 2005
Get the jealousymug. The things that ignorant right wing, mainly American republican twats like to use as their arguments against the left wing They accuse us of hypocrisy and here I explain how wrong they are.
1) Apparently we are hypocrital because we hold life sacred in that we oppose the death penalty but are also pro-abortion. They completely mis understand because I for one, DON'T hold life sacred but hold HAPPINESS sacred. look at it like that and we're not hypocritical.
How much unHAPPINESS can a unborn foetus suffer, even in the very unlikely chance that these extremely young foetus have emotions when they don't know their going to die and are killed quickly when COMPARED TO the CONTINUOUS suffering of an unwanted child an unwanting mother whos had her life destroyed OR the unHAPPINESS of an innocent person on death row or even a guilty person who made one mistake for whatever incomprehensable and hence unjudgeable reason (and can we really ever trust humans not to make mistakes enough to allow them power of life and death over someone?)
2) Apparently we are hypocritical because we oppose hatred and intollerance and yet hate and are intollerant of those who aren't left wing. Well, we oppose OFFENSIVE intollerance. Intollerance for no reason other than someones harmless religious devotion or sexual preference. That sort of intollerance is bullying on a national scale. And are you intollerant of a school yard bully's bullying if you stand up to him? Are you not allowing him to express himself through the way he injures and makes miserable that geek kid?
1) Apparently we are hypocrital because we hold life sacred in that we oppose the death penalty but are also pro-abortion. They completely mis understand because I for one, DON'T hold life sacred but hold HAPPINESS sacred. look at it like that and we're not hypocritical.
How much unHAPPINESS can a unborn foetus suffer, even in the very unlikely chance that these extremely young foetus have emotions when they don't know their going to die and are killed quickly when COMPARED TO the CONTINUOUS suffering of an unwanted child an unwanting mother whos had her life destroyed OR the unHAPPINESS of an innocent person on death row or even a guilty person who made one mistake for whatever incomprehensable and hence unjudgeable reason (and can we really ever trust humans not to make mistakes enough to allow them power of life and death over someone?)
2) Apparently we are hypocritical because we oppose hatred and intollerance and yet hate and are intollerant of those who aren't left wing. Well, we oppose OFFENSIVE intollerance. Intollerance for no reason other than someones harmless religious devotion or sexual preference. That sort of intollerance is bullying on a national scale. And are you intollerant of a school yard bully's bullying if you stand up to him? Are you not allowing him to express himself through the way he injures and makes miserable that geek kid?
Right winger: You liberal scum are so hypocritical
Left Winger: Read above ^ and aren't you the people who think that people on income support and asylum seekers get more money than they deserve (even though its barely enough to live on) and yet don't seem to mind it that in your anti-tax the rich society kids can get more money they deserve (and this time ITS MASSES MORE THAN THEY NEED TO LIVE ON) just because their parents are rich?
Right winger: um.... errrrr.... I need to rethink.
Left Winger: Read above ^ and aren't you the people who think that people on income support and asylum seekers get more money than they deserve (even though its barely enough to live on) and yet don't seem to mind it that in your anti-tax the rich society kids can get more money they deserve (and this time ITS MASSES MORE THAN THEY NEED TO LIVE ON) just because their parents are rich?
Right winger: um.... errrrr.... I need to rethink.
by Geoooooooo March 26, 2005
Get the not hypocrisymug. Also called Chelsea Tractor 4 by 4 SUV. An obese squarish collection of green house gases on wheels rich idiot mothers use but darent ever take off road for fear they will smudge their tested on animals make up. A typical mum truck is about 10 meters tall, takes up all available lanes and as much of the car park as mum thinks she's rich enough to deserve. it has enough room in it for about 20 normal people but usually contains just fat little Reginald and Emelia on their way to independant schools.
So Ok it may do 50 GALLONS per MILE but do you really expect me to WALK like... eaurgh... COMMON people.
by Geoooooooo March 24, 2005
Get the mum truckmug. Anyone who gets promoted to a rank above yours when they've only just arrived when you've been in the same job years and you can't see why there more suitable than you. Used when your feeling enbittered.
by Geoooooooo March 28, 2005
Get the instantmug. by Geoooooooo March 24, 2005
Get the snazzmobilemug.