137 definitions by Baron Neville
Liberty by essence is not an independent entity, but rather it is by default a natural entailment or consequence of unchecked or unrestrained freedom within the social framework of a society. Therefore, Liberty on its own merits void of unrestrained freedom is by essence not an unalienable and natural right, but rather it is a pre-established or predefined inalienable privilege. The miss-perception within society is that the two terms Inalienable and unalienable are used interchangeably and are thus viewed by definition to be synonymous, however this is in fact not correct. Inalienable rights, this refers to a social state in that it makes reference to certain predefined ( Privileges ) which are pre-sanctioned and granted by the state within society upon its members and are therefore not inherent. However, The term ( Unalienable rights ), this makes reference to those rights which are in the state of nature. Rights which are in effect inherent, Universal and thus constitute the very core essence of mans very being and existence within the natural order of nature without which no human being could exist and are not subject to change, regulation , negotiation or compromise. Ultimately, lliberty, constitutes various pre-established and pre-designated privileges sanctioned by society which every member within the social framework of the society in question are bound and are therefore expected to abide by.
The term Liberty or in this case ( Civic or civil Liberty ) originated from the term ( The Charter of Liberties ), also called the Coronation Charter, was a written proclamation by Henry I of England, issued upon his accession to the throne in 1100...Meaning that...It reflected upon certain rights or more pungently ( Privileges ) acknowledged, sanctioned and granted the people by the Monarchy ( State ) . A charter is the grant of authority or rights or ( Liberties ), stating that the granter formally recognizes the prerogative of the recipient to exercise the rights or Liberties ( specified ). It is implicit that the ( granter ) or ( The state ) retains superiority (or sovereignty), and that the recipient ( The people ) admits a ( limited ) or ( inferior) status within the relationship, and it is within that sense that charters were historically granted, and that sense is retained in modern usage of the term. ''
by Baron Neville June 29, 2016
noun
Is a secular and non-political movement, focusing on achieving within society a set of what can be categorized as natural moral and ethical values and principles which are predominant within natural society ( The natural order of things). It refers to the ideological preconditioning of societies perception in relation with how society perceives the material world, from an essential as opposed superficial and excessive slant. Whereby categorizing life's priorities upon their essential and not incidental properties.
Is a secular and non-political movement, focusing on achieving within society a set of what can be categorized as natural moral and ethical values and principles which are predominant within natural society ( The natural order of things). It refers to the ideological preconditioning of societies perception in relation with how society perceives the material world, from an essential as opposed superficial and excessive slant. Whereby categorizing life's priorities upon their essential and not incidental properties.
essenciaology, reprioritizes the illogical and excessive value placed upon the procuring of worldly wealth and material positions, with a more moderate and balanced approach to these. While placing greater value upon those things in life which are essential in the sustaining, preserving and the enhancing the quality of life.
by Baron Neville May 7, 2017
noun
is a term which defines the voiceless collective abject subordination of the social group to a highly centralized autocratic despotic state authority. Which may be either of a political, social, economic or religious nature.
is a term which defines the voiceless collective abject subordination of the social group to a highly centralized autocratic despotic state authority. Which may be either of a political, social, economic or religious nature.
by Baron Neville June 18, 2017
the social collective is the most important component for the realization of a socialist revolution.
by Baron Neville June 26, 2017
freedom constitutes mans inherent, natural and unalienable right, and is thus a universal right or entitlement for all, and is therefore not subject to any and all regulatory measures associated with those inalienable privileges that which are granted by society.
Freedom, refers to mans unalienable natural right to live free from the regulatory intrusions and infringements of society which compromises mans ability in how one wishes to live his or her life as one so chooses.
by Baron Neville April 19, 2016
noun
is an inherent construct shared commonly by all species in the state of nature. In human society, it defines the unconstricted ability for one to exercise ones free choice and will.
is an inherent construct shared commonly by all species in the state of nature. In human society, it defines the unconstricted ability for one to exercise ones free choice and will.
Mikes ability to choose rather or not to participate in the elections is exercising his freedom of choice, and freedom of will in a social context.
by Baron Neville July 11, 2017
noun
a Social Republic, or Social Republicanism, is neither like that of leftist-socialist Republics which are by essence centralised economic statist entities nor are they like that of civic or civil Republics which are political associations, which exert their will over the social group, by pre-imposed state sanctioned Legislation's or more poignantly, state imposed ( Bureaucracies ). But rather a Social Republic is purely a Social idealogical construct, comprised exclusively of a set of idealistic social moral and ethical laws and norms which at its centre lies not the voiceless and identity-less social collective. But rather, the social cooperative independent individual.
a Social Republic, or Social Republicanism, is neither like that of leftist-socialist Republics which are by essence centralised economic statist entities nor are they like that of civic or civil Republics which are political associations, which exert their will over the social group, by pre-imposed state sanctioned Legislation's or more poignantly, state imposed ( Bureaucracies ). But rather a Social Republic is purely a Social idealogical construct, comprised exclusively of a set of idealistic social moral and ethical laws and norms which at its centre lies not the voiceless and identity-less social collective. But rather, the social cooperative independent individual.
by Baron Neville July 3, 2017