Skip to main content

Definitions by Abzugal

Theory of the Power of Reality

The theory that reality itself is shaped by power—that what counts as real, what counts as true, what counts as possible is determined by those who hold power. The Theory of the Power of Reality argues that power doesn't just control resources or institutions; it controls the very terms of existence. The powerful define what can be said, what can be thought, what can be known. They shape reality not by lying but by defining the frameworks within which truth is told. This theory is the foundation of critical realism, of the recognition that reality has a politics, that truth is never neutral.
Theory of the Power of Reality Example: "He used to think reality was just reality—given, fixed, neutral. The Theory of the Power of Reality showed him otherwise: those with power decided what was real. Their version was taught, repeated, enforced. Other realities existed, but they were suppressed. He started asking who got to define reality—and who paid the price."

Scientific Ivory Tower

An institution, community, or mindset where science is treated as the exclusive domain of an elite—where certain methods are privileged and others dismissed, where scientific standards are set by those inside the tower and imposed on those outside. The Scientific Ivory Tower mistakes its local practices for universal ones, its preferred methods for the only path to knowledge. It produces science that works within the tower but fails to address the needs of those outside. The Scientific Ivory Tower is the home of the academic who can't communicate with the public, the researcher whose work never leaves the lab, the discipline that has become irrelevant to the world it claims to study.
Scientific Ivory Tower Example: "The research institute was a scientific ivory tower—cutting-edge work, brilliant minds, zero impact. Their papers were cited by each other; their findings never reached the public. The tower kept them pure and irrelevant. Outside, people struggled with problems the tower could solve—if it ever looked down."
Scientific Ivory Tower by Abzugal February 21, 2026

Logical Ivory Tower

An institution, community, or mindset where logic is treated as the exclusive domain of an elite—where certain ways of reasoning are privileged and others dismissed, where logical standards are set by those inside the tower and imposed on those outside. The Logical Ivory Tower mistakes its local standards for universal ones, its preferred methods for the only methods. It produces logical systems that work perfectly within the tower but fail outside it. The Logical Ivory Tower is the home of the hyperrationalist, the formalist, the one who confuses their toolkit with the toolbox.
Logical Ivory Tower Example: "The philosophy department was a logical ivory tower—debating fine points of formal logic while the world burned. Their arguments were impeccable; their relevance was zero. The tower kept them safe from the messy, illogical world—and also kept them useless to it."
Logical Ivory Tower by Abzugal February 21, 2026

Fallacy of Exhaustive Conviction

The fallacy of demanding that one's opponent be absolutely, exhaustively convinced before any action can be taken or any conclusion reached. "You're not 100% certain, so you can't act." The fallacy sets an impossible standard—complete conviction, total certainty, no doubt whatsoever—and uses it to block any decision, any action, any conclusion. It's the logic of the certainty trap applied to conviction: since nothing can be known with absolute certainty, nothing can be done. The Fallacy of Exhaustive Conviction is beloved of those who want to maintain the status quo, who can always find a reason to wait, to study further, to demand more certainty.
Fallacy of Exhaustive Conviction Example: "She was 95% sure the policy would help, but he demanded exhaustive conviction: 'You can't be absolutely certain, so we can't act.' The 5% doubt was enough to block the 95% certainty. The Fallacy of Exhaustive Conviction had done its work: making action impossible by demanding impossible certainty."

Scientifically Privileged Position

A position within scientific discourse that is granted unearned authority—not because its evidence is stronger but because it's associated with dominant institutions, funders, or research traditions. A scientifically privileged position gets funded, published, and cited; its findings are reported as news; its experts are invited to panels. Alternative positions struggle for recognition, dismissed as fringe or pseudoscience regardless of their merits. The scientifically privileged position doesn't have to prove itself harder; it's already trusted. This privilege shapes what counts as science, what questions get asked, what answers are accepted.
Scientifically Privileged Position Example: "Her research, done in community with marginalized populations, was dismissed as 'not rigorous.' His research, funded by a pharmaceutical company, published in top journals, was taken as gospel. The scientifically privileged position wasn't better; it was just privileged. She kept working, knowing that recognition might never come."

Logically Privileged Position

A position within a debate or discourse that is granted unearned authority—not because its arguments are stronger but because it's associated with dominant institutions, cultures, or power structures. A logically privileged position gets to define the terms of debate, set the standards of evidence, determine what counts as logical. Its claims are taken seriously by default; its opponents must work twice as hard to be heard. The logically privileged position doesn't have to prove itself; it's presumed valid until proven otherwise. This privilege is invisible to those who hold it—they just think they're being logical.
Logically Privileged Position Example: "In the debate, his position was logically privileged: he spoke from a prestigious university, cited mainstream sources, used familiar frameworks. Her position, from a marginalized community, using alternative sources, was constantly questioned. The privilege wasn't in his arguments; it was in his position. He didn't have to work to be heard; she did."

Greedy Gaming

The practice or culture of designing games with maximum profit as the sole objective, at the expense of player experience, artistic integrity, or fair play. Greedy Gaming is mercenary gaming's more honest name: it's gaming driven by greed, pure and simple. It's the reason $70 games still have microtransactions, the reason "ultimate editions" cost $100, the reason you can pay to win. Greedy Gaming has normalized extraction, made exploitation expected. Players have learned to accept that games will try to squeeze them, that "free" means "costs more," that fun is now a product to be purchased in installments.
Example: "He looked at his game library—dozens of games, hundreds of dollars, and still he felt like he owned nothing. Greedy Gaming had made every purchase a rental, every game a service. He wasn't a player; he was a subscriber. The fun was temporary; the extraction was permanent."
Greedy Gaming by Abzugal February 21, 2026