Universal Machine Pistol
Developed by Heckler & Koch. 25-round clip chambered for .45acp.
Considered to be "an MP5 for experts". Considered by me to be "the modern-day Tommygun".
Developed by Heckler & Koch. 25-round clip chambered for .45acp.
Considered to be "an MP5 for experts". Considered by me to be "the modern-day Tommygun".
"The UMP is just a gun one can just fuck with in Counterstrike. It serves you bad, then it serves you good. It's a hypocritical gun it seems...so that's why I deem it as 'a gun you fuck with once in a while'."
-me
-me
by Dave April 01, 2004
adj. - That which has shibooty-like qualities.
n. - something which is unexplainable
v. - to shibooty (shibootied)
n. - something which is unexplainable
v. - to shibooty (shibootied)
Dude! That's totally shibooty!
Q: So what happened after the panda melted?
A: Awwww man, it got all shibooty after that.
So after she pulled off her mask and showed you her "real face", what did you do?
Man, I shibootied her all night long!
Q: So what happened after the panda melted?
A: Awwww man, it got all shibooty after that.
So after she pulled off her mask and showed you her "real face", what did you do?
Man, I shibootied her all night long!
by Dave November 19, 2003
Another VLR member. Shado is a cood guy who always speaks in faces and mysteries. He has a bad past with the PSB and is now rivals with them and fights them at every turn. He's also mysterious, but not as much as Chuggy.
by Dave January 08, 2004
A champion of poor and rich alike, syn- unwilting, invulnerable, invincible, unbeatable, omnipotent, excellent, awesome, tremendous, great
To be dtra, is to be great.
by Dave May 30, 2003
In the programming language Prolog, a cut (articulated by the exclamation point) removes all choicepoints created by the preceding statement. Use of the cut is deprecated, or at least discouraged.
A choicepoint is a fork-in-the-road to a Prolog program. Multiple branches of possibilities are saved at this point, with the intention of returning (or "backtracking") to a different path if the current one does not lead to success.
Too many choicepoints, and the program may run out of stack. (ie. Not have enough memory available to store all previous opportunities for different paths.) A cut can prevent this, if used properly, by erasing choicepoints that are no longer relevant or necessary.
For those of you still with me, it's about 2am and I'm tripping on psilocybin mushrooms. So you're going to have to bear with me. Right now, I could use some exclamation points. I'm in serious need of a cut, as the several preceding paragraphs are no doubt proof of.
This nice little analogy probably isn't too clear to anyone outside my head, but to me, the brain normally behaves like a Prolog program with an abundance of exclamation points. Stray thoughts are "cut" out of existence before they can either clog one's brain, or exit via the mouth and manifest themselves as an act of stupidity. In an absence of cuts, however, thoughts may grow out of control and essentially clog one's head. This absence of cuts may be achieved though the use of drugs conventionally classed as "hallucinogens", whether intentional or not.
This absence can be advantageous in moderation, as it can allow thoughts that would normally be subconsciously expelled as absurd or even primitive to blossom into new ideas. But as previously stated, a cut is useful every now and then just to "clear one's head" if the thoughts become overpowering or focusing on any one idea becomes difficult.
And I think this little essay is a good example of the absence of cuts, what they can lead to and why the cut is necessary in day-to-day life. So please, someone hand me an exclamation point.
A choicepoint is a fork-in-the-road to a Prolog program. Multiple branches of possibilities are saved at this point, with the intention of returning (or "backtracking") to a different path if the current one does not lead to success.
Too many choicepoints, and the program may run out of stack. (ie. Not have enough memory available to store all previous opportunities for different paths.) A cut can prevent this, if used properly, by erasing choicepoints that are no longer relevant or necessary.
For those of you still with me, it's about 2am and I'm tripping on psilocybin mushrooms. So you're going to have to bear with me. Right now, I could use some exclamation points. I'm in serious need of a cut, as the several preceding paragraphs are no doubt proof of.
This nice little analogy probably isn't too clear to anyone outside my head, but to me, the brain normally behaves like a Prolog program with an abundance of exclamation points. Stray thoughts are "cut" out of existence before they can either clog one's brain, or exit via the mouth and manifest themselves as an act of stupidity. In an absence of cuts, however, thoughts may grow out of control and essentially clog one's head. This absence of cuts may be achieved though the use of drugs conventionally classed as "hallucinogens", whether intentional or not.
This absence can be advantageous in moderation, as it can allow thoughts that would normally be subconsciously expelled as absurd or even primitive to blossom into new ideas. But as previously stated, a cut is useful every now and then just to "clear one's head" if the thoughts become overpowering or focusing on any one idea becomes difficult.
And I think this little essay is a good example of the absence of cuts, what they can lead to and why the cut is necessary in day-to-day life. So please, someone hand me an exclamation point.
Me: "I need some explanation points."
Trip buddy 1: "What?"
Me: "I need some explanation points."
Trip buddy 2: "Are you Einstein?"
Prolog code example:
factorial(N,M) :- N < 0, !, fail.
factorial(0,1).
factorial(N,M) :- X is N-1,
factorial(X,Y),
M is N * Y.
Trip buddy 1: "What?"
Me: "I need some explanation points."
Trip buddy 2: "Are you Einstein?"
Prolog code example:
factorial(N,M) :- N < 0, !, fail.
factorial(0,1).
factorial(N,M) :- X is N-1,
factorial(X,Y),
M is N * Y.
by Dave October 29, 2004