A rhetorical stance where someone claims to be “objective” while systematically dismissing, trivializing, or attacking
one side of a conflict. Misguided objectivity mistakes neutrality for
truth: it assumes that the most “balanced” position is to treat both sides equally, regardless of evidence or power dynamics. In online conflicts, it often looks
like a moderator or bystander saying “I’
m sure both sides have faults” when
one side has been gangharassed for weeks. The stance serves to legitimize abuse by refusing to name it.
Misguided “Objectivity” Example: “When she asked for help with the
mob targeting her, the mod
said ‘I’m staying objective—I’m sure there’s fault on both sides.’ Misguided objectivity: using neutrality to excuse
abuse.”