legally by law

when something is or becomes legal, based on stipulations by a law.

Im just kidding, it doesnt mean shit. It's really just a heavily over used phrase we use to sound smart. 50% of the time it works all the time.

It's like going to Mcdonalds and ordering a cheeseburger with cheese.

"It's not my fault you signed docs on an A.R.M, your house payment is now $6080.27, and that's not something that was just made up. You owe it, legally by law "

by Rob$ June 26, 2008

Crony Legal Systems / Legal Cronyism / Crony Law / Law Cronyism

Interchangeable terms describing a legal regime where the application of the law is systematically distorted to benefit a connected network of insiders—politicians, their donors, corporate allies, and oligarchs. Justice becomes a function of political loyalty and financial influence. Laws are written vaguely to allow selective enforcement, prosecution is weaponized against opponents, and regulatory capture is the norm. It is rule by law for the people, and rule without law for the cronies.

Example: A mining company owned by a senator's brother receives a waived environmental impact assessment, while a small competitor is bankrupted by relentless inspections and fines for minor violations. This is Legal Cronyism. The same environmental laws exist on the books, but they function as a shield for the powerful and a sword against the weak. Crony Legal Systems / Legal Cronyism / Crony Law / Law Cronyism

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 4, 2026

Critical Legal Theory / Critical Law Theory

An interdisciplinary approach (often abbreviated as Crit) that argues law is not a neutral system of rational rules, but a social construct deeply intertwined with politics, ideology, and power. It seeks to "de-naturalize" law, showing how it legitimizes and perpetuates hierarchies of race, gender, class, and sexuality. The law is seen not as a solver of disputes, but as a site where political conflict is both expressed and masked.

Critical Legal Theory / Critical Law Theory Example: A Critical Legal Theory reading of property law wouldn't see it as a timeless defense of ownership. It would demonstrate how doctrines like "trespass" and "eminent domain" were historically forged to dispossess Indigenous peoples and concentrate wealth, arguing that the law's "neutral" principles encode a specific, contested vision of social order.

by Nammugal February 5, 2026