A person who adheres to Judeo/Christian ethics. (ie: To treat others, as you would want to be treated). Has very little tolerance for people practicing amoral, greedy, or racist bigotry . . . intended to give myopic (ie: short sighed) Plutocrats and Oligarchs more and more of the zero-sum pie. Putting on notice people not learning from history, that exponentially growing income inequality will eventually bring out the guillotines.
by sir88 September 15, 2020
Slang phrase that's an off-shoot of the phrase "Social Justice Warrior", but with a bit of King Crimson thrown in
by cloversuper8 January 30, 2022
An activist who is motivated more by a love of conflict than by a desire to accomplish the (typically liberal) purported political goal. Whereas regular activists prefer to win without a fight, a social justice warrior prefers to fight without a win.
"I have to spend an afternoon sorting through my old Twitter posts. If I don't, some self-righteous social justice warrior might go digging and try to whip up a mob to get me fired for using a currently-disapproved term sixteen years ago when I was in high school instead of just privately asking me to remove it."
by IowanStill September 3, 2023
A person who uses the fight against social justice warriors as an excuse to be rude, condescending, and sometimes violent for the purpose of relieving their frustrations or validating their sense of unwarranted moral superiority. The behaviors of antisocialocial justice warriors usually have no impact on the civil rights movement since it is their arguments social justice warriors decided to fight and ASJW only strenghen SJWs believe of being needed.
Behaving like an antisocial justice warrior is as stupid as to behave like an social justice warrior
by 69Butthurt69 November 2, 2018
CJW:
Cyber Justice Warrior. A pejorative term for a “in the scene” individual who repeatedly and vehemently engages in arguments on Cyber justice on the Internet. Calling it “Drama” they often argue in a shallow or not well-thought-out way, for the purpose of raising their own personal reputation. A Cyber justice warrior, or CJW, does not necessarily strongly believe all that they say, or even care about the group(s) they are fighting on behalf of. They typically repeat points from whoever is the most popular hacker, tweeter or commenter of the moment. Their goal seems to be hoping they will be "1337" in the infosec/hacker community via likes, RT’s, comments, and become popular in return. They are very sure to adopt stances that are "correct" in their social circle.
It’s evident you are dealing with a CJW when they take to their blogs to summarize/laymen the “drama thus far”. CJW’s post in various forms of “Here’s my opinion, everyone is an asshole” essays, that only speak from a one sided perspective. (In other words, The hacker they most easily relate to.) Other signs are sub tweets, passive aggressive “jokes” and tendency to join a dog-pile for a “controversy” they have not taken the time to fully research, even when the OP or the entire thread is readily available.
Cyber Justice Warrior. A pejorative term for a “in the scene” individual who repeatedly and vehemently engages in arguments on Cyber justice on the Internet. Calling it “Drama” they often argue in a shallow or not well-thought-out way, for the purpose of raising their own personal reputation. A Cyber justice warrior, or CJW, does not necessarily strongly believe all that they say, or even care about the group(s) they are fighting on behalf of. They typically repeat points from whoever is the most popular hacker, tweeter or commenter of the moment. Their goal seems to be hoping they will be "1337" in the infosec/hacker community via likes, RT’s, comments, and become popular in return. They are very sure to adopt stances that are "correct" in their social circle.
It’s evident you are dealing with a CJW when they take to their blogs to summarize/laymen the “drama thus far”. CJW’s post in various forms of “Here’s my opinion, everyone is an asshole” essays, that only speak from a one sided perspective. (In other words, The hacker they most easily relate to.) Other signs are sub tweets, passive aggressive “jokes” and tendency to join a dog-pile for a “controversy” they have not taken the time to fully research, even when the OP or the entire thread is readily available.
by poopsi mcgoo November 3, 2015