When multiple Alexa type devices exist in the same area that misinterpret commands resulting in unintended, puzzling, random, incorrect or erroneous outcome. Sometimes a beep, noise, or odd answer.
While playing dinner music, I told Alexa to stop, but instead it activated the other one on my TV answering me with compalexity asking if it wanted it to search the web.
by anonymous September 12, 2021
Get the Compalexity mug.LISTEN UP YOU MOTHERFUCKERS!! THIS IS THE LORD COMPLEXITY, REMEMBER US! AND IF YOU DON'T, WE'RE GONNA BEAT THE LIVING SHIT OUT OF YOU!
by Cristo Piss November 1, 2017
Get the The Lord Complexity mug.by Will Spencer September 4, 2003
Get the complexify mug.by Fred Hofstetter September 25, 2006
Get the complexify mug.A myth perpetrated by Creationists and IDiots alike (although they are the same people really). It states that certain bodily systems are "too complex" to have evolved over millions of years despite evidence to the contrary
Creationist IDiot: the human eye is irreducibly complex, it cannot have evolved
Scientist: we have found evidence to the contrary and have run simulations on primitive photosensitive cells which disprove irreducible complexity.
Creationist IDiot: the human eye is irreducibly complex, it cannot have evolved
Scientist: did you understand what i just told you?
Creationist IDiot: the human eye is irreducibly complex, it cannot have evolved
Scientist: I take it you either didn't understand that or you are just close minded towards evolution
Creationist IDiot: the human eye is irreducibly complex, it cannot have evolved
Scientist: ok I'm not dealing with you anymore
Creationist IDiot: We won! he cannot prove Evilution, WE WON!!!
Scientist: we have found evidence to the contrary and have run simulations on primitive photosensitive cells which disprove irreducible complexity.
Creationist IDiot: the human eye is irreducibly complex, it cannot have evolved
Scientist: did you understand what i just told you?
Creationist IDiot: the human eye is irreducibly complex, it cannot have evolved
Scientist: I take it you either didn't understand that or you are just close minded towards evolution
Creationist IDiot: the human eye is irreducibly complex, it cannot have evolved
Scientist: ok I'm not dealing with you anymore
Creationist IDiot: We won! he cannot prove Evilution, WE WON!!!
by person with at least half a br April 21, 2010
Get the Irreducible Complexity mug.Complexity Clan is The Best Counter-Strike Team in North America. Recently Replacing Team 3D for the Title and is one of the most dominating clans on Counter-strike.
by ot^Matallica May 18, 2007
Get the Complexity Clan mug.This theory is a favorite of theists. It says that life is simply too complex to have developed via natural selection or random mutation. However...
- on July 11, 2002, scientists artificially re-created polio. Using only the DNA of the polio virus and a series of synthetic chemicals, they recreated the natural desire to reproduce, the ability to evolve, and all other mechanisms that make a virus, LIFE, work.
- the bacterial flagellum argument has also been disproven. Back in 1996, scientists found that the 10-part "Type 3 secretion mechanism" that pathogenic germs have is very similar in function to the bacterial flagellum, but does so with only 10 parts. Therefore, each supposedly "irreducible" mechanism is perfectly functional if you take away the RIGHT parts. It is still reducible.
- the Eye argument has also been disproven. All you need are some simple photo-receptive cells that just detect light. As the species ages, this mechanism becomes more and more useful as these traits develop into actual senses. Keep in mind that these mechanisms had countless opportunities to develop across countless species during the Cambrian Explosion 500 million years ago, and have been getting more and more complex over that amount of time.
Sorry for using science and fact, but keep in mind that if you make a claim, there's always someone willing to check your facts.
- on July 11, 2002, scientists artificially re-created polio. Using only the DNA of the polio virus and a series of synthetic chemicals, they recreated the natural desire to reproduce, the ability to evolve, and all other mechanisms that make a virus, LIFE, work.
- the bacterial flagellum argument has also been disproven. Back in 1996, scientists found that the 10-part "Type 3 secretion mechanism" that pathogenic germs have is very similar in function to the bacterial flagellum, but does so with only 10 parts. Therefore, each supposedly "irreducible" mechanism is perfectly functional if you take away the RIGHT parts. It is still reducible.
- the Eye argument has also been disproven. All you need are some simple photo-receptive cells that just detect light. As the species ages, this mechanism becomes more and more useful as these traits develop into actual senses. Keep in mind that these mechanisms had countless opportunities to develop across countless species during the Cambrian Explosion 500 million years ago, and have been getting more and more complex over that amount of time.
Sorry for using science and fact, but keep in mind that if you make a claim, there's always someone willing to check your facts.
by kjun1_3 February 25, 2011
Get the Irreducible Complexity mug.