The Random Scale or, The R.R. System is the measure of how random to Right a person is. On a line scale, the middle point is neutral. The other end on the left is Random, and the space between the neutral and the random is "neutral random". On the right of Neutral, is the "Right" ppl. Between the Right and the neutral is "neutral Right". (see eg.1 for a better understanding..)
Random Ppl can have a level of seriousness. They they move slowly up the scale but still maintain a level of randomness.
When right ppl attempt to be random, then the scale swtiches! This is called The Switch
Random Ppl can have a level of seriousness. They they move slowly up the scale but still maintain a level of randomness.
When right ppl attempt to be random, then the scale swtiches! This is called The Switch
eg.1
Random person:..i have a pineapple...and it is pink..=D
Right person: ..Rigggghhhht
(By saying a random coment to someone, u can determine wether they are random or right by their answer)
Random person:..i have a pineapple...and it is pink..=D
Right person: ..Rigggghhhht
(By saying a random coment to someone, u can determine wether they are random or right by their answer)
by *WiCkeD* March 22, 2005

Forgot rating a person 1 to 10, instead try using the “Cove” scale whenever you are describing how you would rate another person to a friend.
The cove scale is a rating from 1 - 4
1 - I wouldn’t date them and I don’t know why anybody else would.
2 - I wouldn’t date them but I can see why other people would.
3 - I would date them but I can see why other people wouldn’t.
4 - I would date them but I can see why other people would.
The cove scale is a rating from 1 - 4
1 - I wouldn’t date them and I don’t know why anybody else would.
2 - I wouldn’t date them but I can see why other people would.
3 - I would date them but I can see why other people wouldn’t.
4 - I would date them but I can see why other people would.
by YungJezus June 12, 2022

This is an amended version of the 1-4 scale. This scale removes almost all subjectivity from measuring your attraction to someone. Posts on this site have done their best to set out this scale, but this is the definitive, amended version.
The Basic 1-4 Scale (as already noted by Howie440):
1. I wouldn't and I don't see why anyone would.
2. I wouldn't buy I can see why someone would.
3. I would but I can see why someone wouldn't.
4. I would and I can't see why anyone wouldn't.
A New Addition (the 1-5 scale):
5. I would, I can't see why anyone wouldn't, and I'll be happy if I can just get with them.
Amendments & clarifications:
i) Who can really be considered a 4? - To avoid any subjectivity, keep in mind that: if everyone in the group says they're a 3, they're a 4. This is because if everyone calls them a 3, then everyone would and, therefore they're a 4.
ii) The 5 - More of a theoretical idea than a reality. The 5 is someone whom you would be completely satisfied to get with (make out with) once and never see again. They are so attractive to you that you would happily take the one opportunity and never try to talk to them again.
However - this means that if you do try to talk to, message, or get with them again, they are now by default a 4.
iii) It should also be noted that much like how any 4 must already be an agreed 3, any 5 must already be an agreed 4. This is continuous scale.
The Basic 1-4 Scale (as already noted by Howie440):
1. I wouldn't and I don't see why anyone would.
2. I wouldn't buy I can see why someone would.
3. I would but I can see why someone wouldn't.
4. I would and I can't see why anyone wouldn't.
A New Addition (the 1-5 scale):
5. I would, I can't see why anyone wouldn't, and I'll be happy if I can just get with them.
Amendments & clarifications:
i) Who can really be considered a 4? - To avoid any subjectivity, keep in mind that: if everyone in the group says they're a 3, they're a 4. This is because if everyone calls them a 3, then everyone would and, therefore they're a 4.
ii) The 5 - More of a theoretical idea than a reality. The 5 is someone whom you would be completely satisfied to get with (make out with) once and never see again. They are so attractive to you that you would happily take the one opportunity and never try to talk to them again.
However - this means that if you do try to talk to, message, or get with them again, they are now by default a 4.
iii) It should also be noted that much like how any 4 must already be an agreed 3, any 5 must already be an agreed 4. This is continuous scale.
Me: "Hey, how was the club last night?"
Roommate: "Pretty good, I met someone."
Me: "Nice, good looking?"
Roommate: "I'd say 8/10."
Me: "How am I meant to know what that means, use the 1-5 scale."
Roommate: "Oh like a solid 3."
Me: "Glad to hear it mate."
Roommate: "Pretty good, I met someone."
Me: "Nice, good looking?"
Roommate: "I'd say 8/10."
Me: "How am I meant to know what that means, use the 1-5 scale."
Roommate: "Oh like a solid 3."
Me: "Glad to hear it mate."
by yourwelcome03 February 6, 2022

by The Brickmeister December 17, 2009

when a character's most significant/only scaling is against characters they lose to rather than characters they win against or are relative to.
Rengoku has kashimo scaling to Akaza.
Shinobu's best feat is she kashimo scales to Douma in speed.
I hate kashimo scaling, authors should just let their characters win their battles!
Shinobu's best feat is she kashimo scales to Douma in speed.
I hate kashimo scaling, authors should just let their characters win their battles!
by theknownallbeall July 29, 2024

by baby youngster July 6, 2016

by no_one_of_consequence September 13, 2016
