Theory of Cognitive Malandragem

A framework examining malandragem in thinking itself—the cognitive strategies of mental cunning, mental shortcuts, and clever reasoning. Cognitive Malandragem theory asks: How do we trick ourselves into believing what we want? When does clever thinking become self-deception? How do we use mental malandragem to navigate cognitive dissonance? The theory explores the mind's own cunning—the ways we bend mental rules to survive psychological pressure.

Theory of Cognitive Malandragem "He knew the evidence, but he also knew he couldn't face it—so his mind found a way around. Cognitive Malandragem: mental cunning as psychological survival. The theory asks: when does clever thinking become self-deception? And who decides the difference?"

by Dumu The Void March 5, 2026

Theory of Social and Cognitive Paradigms

The theory that we see everything and understand reality through paradigms—frameworks of assumptions, concepts, values, and practices that shape what we can see and how we interpret it. The Theory of Social and Cognitive Paradigms argues that this applies to everything, including the scientific method itself, which operates within its own paradigms that change over time. There is no paradigm-free perception, no view from nowhere. What we take to be "just the facts" is always facts-as-seen-through-a-particular-paradigm. The theory explains paradigm shifts in science (Kuhn), cultural differences in perception, and the persistence of disagreement even among reasonable people. It's the foundation of humility about knowledge, the recognition that our way of seeing is one among many.

Example: "He used to think science was just accumulating facts. The Theory of Social and Cognitive Paradigms showed him otherwise: facts were always facts-within-a-paradigm. When paradigms shifted, facts shifted too. Science wasn't a straight line; it was a series of revolutions, each with its own way of seeing."

by Abzugal March 9, 2026

AI Applied to Cognitive Sciences

The use of artificial intelligence as a tool to model, test, and understand the human mind. By building computational models that perform cognitive tasks—recognizing faces, making decisions, learning languages—researchers can create and test theories about how our own cognition might work. If an AI model behaves like a human under certain conditions, it might suggest that the human brain is using a similar computational strategy. It's cognitive science's most powerful laboratory.

Example: "They weren't sure how children learn grammar until they used AI applied to cognitive sciences to build a model that learned the same way, confirming their hypothesis."

by Dumu The Void March 11, 2026

Argumentum Ad Cognitionem

A logical fallacy where one dismisses an argument by claiming the opponent is delusional, cognitively impaired, or using ableist slurs to describe their mental state. The fallacy lies in treating cognitive capacity as a refutation of claims, as if being confused or mistaken in some areas invalidates everything someone says. This fallacy is particularly toxic because it weaponizes genuine cognitive differences and disabilities, using them as cudgels to dismiss dissent. "You're delusional" becomes a way of saying "I don't need to engage with your points" while performing the appearance of having refuted them. It's argument by ableism, not by reason.

Example: "She presented documented evidence of corruption, and his response was simply 'you're delusional.' Argumentum Ad Cognitionem: using accusations of cognitive failure to avoid confronting uncomfortable facts."

by Dumu The Void March 16, 2026

Contextualism of the Cognitive Sciences

A philosophical framework holding that cognition is inherently context-dependent—that what counts as thinking, reasoning, memory, and perception varies with the contexts in which they occur. Contextualism in cognitive science challenges laboratory-based models that treat cognition as a context-independent process. A memory formed in one context is retrieved differently in another; reasoning that works in the lab fails in the wild; perception is shaped by cultural context, task context, and social context. Contextualism demands that cognitive scientists attend to the environments in which cognition actually happens, recognizing that the mind is not a context-free computer but an embodied, embedded system shaped by its surroundings.

Example: "His contextualism of the cognitive sciences meant he rejected the idea that lab studies of reasoning revealed universal mental processes. Cognition, he insisted, is always cognition-in-context—and the lab is just one context, not the neutral setting for discovering how minds work everywhere."

by Dumu The Void March 20, 2026

Perspectivism of the Cognitive Sciences

A philosophical framework holding that our understanding of cognition is always from a perspective—that what cognitive science discovers depends on the methods, models, and theoretical frameworks it employs. Perspectives in cognitive science include computational models, neural approaches, embodied theories, extended-mind frameworks, phenomenological accounts—each revealing different aspects of cognition, each limited by its assumptions. Perspectivism doesn't claim that all accounts are equally valid, but that validity is always validity-from-a-perspective. It demands that cognitive scientists be explicit about their commitments, recognizing that the tools they choose shape what they can find.

Example: "Her perspectivism of the cognitive sciences meant she could see that computational models revealed something real about the mind, but so did phenomenological accounts of lived experience. Neither was the whole truth; each was truth-from-a-perspective."

by Dumu The Void March 20, 2026

Multicontextualism of the Cognitive Sciences

A philosophical framework holding that cognition operates within multiple, irreducible contexts—biological, psychological, social, cultural, technological, environmental—that cannot be reduced to a single explanatory level. Multicontextualism goes beyond contextualism by insisting that contexts interact and that understanding cognition requires mapping these interactions. A cognitive process like decision-making is shaped by neural architecture, personal history, social norms, cultural values, and the tools available—all at once. Multicontextualism demands that cognitive scientists develop frameworks that can handle this complexity, rejecting reductionist programs that try to explain everything at one level.

Example: "His multicontextualism of the cognitive sciences meant he studied how people navigate not just with internal maps, but with phones, street signs, cultural norms about asking directions, and the architecture of cities—all contexts interacting to shape the cognitive process of finding one's way."

by Dumu The Void March 20, 2026