Laterally Objective Liberalism

The study of proving Elicia wrong in a dramatic way

Hey, did you see how silly Elicia looked when Thatcher said Laterally Objective Liberalism

Yeah, but he proved her wrong

by The_Word_Scaper May 19, 2021

Anarcho Marxism Liberalism with Vaushist Characteristics

Like Marxism, It advocates for the removal of not just capitalism through the means of a worker revolution, but the state as a whole. Its economy will be nonexistent, everyone will starve, and the happiness will be nothing but zero. The only source of Income will be through debate streams with Popular Alt Right Figure, Steven The Swastika Bonnell II, and through interactions with Known Jew Liberal Ian Kochinski. The only topics will be how everyone is just a clone of the other, and they will both defend paedophilia, citing out of context clips as the main reason for being villified. But they're very different people. Probably.

"Hey Man, this whole nazism and socialism thing is cringe. How about we study Anarcho Marxism Liberalism with Vaushist Characteristics?."

"Bro, are you a fag?."

by thiscouldalsobematthewcastro July 22, 2022

Partisan-line liberalism

The same 5 leftist suppositions regurgitated repeatedly by people who literally think they are more intelligent than anyone who disagrees with them. Because if they were smart they would think what I think! Right? For example: The conflation of abortion and healthcare. The idea ender is a social construct (Which it's not but you're willing to collectively pretend that it is for the sake of making people feel the way you want them to feel and that's all that matters boy-oh-boy are you suuuper willing to collectively PRETEND things reach a desired outcome. It's almost like... You don't actually care). If there are disparate outcomes between people it can be attributed to UNFAIR DISCRIMINATION (which we care so much about) and nothing else. Like, if all the retards with fat cocks were getting all of the women. It would clearly be because of societal or systematic discrimination and demonization of not retarded, not fat cocks. Otherwise the outcomes would be the same... Right? Or is there NOT discrimination against those things? Nevermind. It seems like a lot of atheists are using this dogma to supplant the religion they abandoned. You're required accept all of the suppositions based on an appeal to an authority... That is superordinate to all other authorities (even if there are other authorities who contradict them)... Who wrote a book... Why does this sound familiar?

Partisan-line liberal "Trans women are real women!"

Hym "You know... There is a real difference between a trans woman and a not trans woman... Right?"

Partisan-line liberal "No. Trans people exist."

Hym "I don't doubt their existence but there IS a difference. They are not the same."

Partisan-line liberal "But intersex people..."

Hym "Are not the same as trans people. There are differences between things."

Partisan-line liberal "The brain scans.... The history..."

Hym " 'More like' is not the same as 'is the same as' and the history relates to their existence and not to whether or not they are different the non-trans women."

Partisan-line liberal "Insert slogan here!"

Hym "I think Partisan-line liberalism is the result of you agreeing to collectively PRETEND to trick 'stupid people' into not violencing trans people. I think that you think that if you just don't acknowledge the difference and prevent people from pointing out the difference between the the two things you will trick people into not hurting them. WHAT'S REALLY HAPPENING, on the other hand, is you're tricking the trans people into thinking that there is not difference... and then the trans people are tricking men into sleeping with them... and then they're getting beaten to death... You're doing that."

by Hym Iam June 14, 2023

Victims of Liberalism Memorial Foundation

An institution rooted in a radical critique of classical liberalism—the ideology prioritizing individual rights, private property, and limited government. It argues that liberalism's core tenets inherently produce victims by sanctifying inequality (through property rights), enabling exploitation under the guise of free contract, and dissolving communal bonds in favor of atomized individualism. It memorializes those sacrificed to the abstract gods of the market and negative liberty.

Victims of Liberalism Memorial Foundation *Example: An exhibit might trace the life of a 19th-century English peasant forced off communal land by Enclosure Acts (a liberal property-rights project), who then became a destitute urban factory worker with no social safety net ("liberated" from traditional supports), framing them as a classic Victim of Liberalism.*

by Dumu The Void February 5, 2026

Rationalization against Victims of Liberalism

The process of explaining away liberal society’s failures (deep inequality, democratic erosion) as results of insufficient liberalism (“not enough free markets,” “not enough democracy”), or as aberrations caused by external illiberal forces. The system’s logic is never wrong, only imperfectly applied.

Rationalization against Victims of Liberalism Example: “Our politics aren’t corrupt because of lobbying and dark money; it’s because we don’t have true campaign finance liberalism. More transparency and more speech will fix it.” This rationalization treats the systemic flaws as accidental, preserving faith in the original ideology by blaming its imperfect implementation.

by Abzugal February 8, 2026

Logicalization against the Victims of Liberalism

Using the formal principles of liberal philosophy (individualism, social contract theory) to logically dismiss claims of systemic victimization. If rights are individual and the contract is consensual, then collective grievances or claims of embedded oppression are framed as logical category errors.

Logicalization against the Victims of Liberalism Example: “You claim systemic racism, but the law is colorblind. Logically, any disparity must be due to individual or cultural factors, not the liberal system itself.” This logicalization uses the system’s own theoretical axioms to immunize it from critique, defining any evidence of group harm as illogical from the start.

by Abzugal February 8, 2026

Trivialization against the Victims of Liberalism

Portraying the negative consequences of liberal policies as minor inconveniences or as the hysterical complaints of groups seeking “special treatment.” It mocks demands for substantive equality as a desire for “coddling” or a refusal to engage in the “free marketplace of ideas.”

Trivialization against the Victims of Liberalism Example: Dismissing calls for robust anti-discrimination laws with, “So now we need a ‘safe space’ from every mean comment? Grow a thicker skin.” This trivialization reduces the material and psychological impact of discrimination to mere hurt feelings, framing the liberal norm of resilience as the only valid response.

by Abzugal February 8, 2026