A phrase used to "put down" an opposing Mario Kart Double Dash player. Saying "Sweet Items Dude" implies that they are last place in the race and are getting great items in order to catch up.
Robert: Jack, Sweet Items Dude, i forgot how good you were at this game.
Jack: OHHHH i forgot about that clause in the contract, feed it to Pedtke.
Jack: OHHHH i forgot about that clause in the contract, feed it to Pedtke.
by Robert James The Third March 21, 2007
by longestnameintheworldlolyeahno February 23, 2021
Yo man whose bringing the item number nine to the 311 concert tonight? You know there musics only good when your high
by toke a bell June 25, 2010
The Asian way of threatening english players in a MMORPG (an Asian dominated game genre)
Other various plugins:
ITAM
GIB
^__^;;
KEKE
etc...
Other various plugins:
ITAM
GIB
^__^;;
KEKE
etc...
Korean Player1: GIB ITAM OR PK KEKEK ^__^;;
US Player1: fuck u gook
**Korean Player1 dealt 420432423 damage to US Player1**
**Korean Player1 loots AwesomeRareItam**
(DEAD)US Player1: OMG FUCK U
Korean Player1: KEKEKKE ~^________^~
US Player1: fuck u gook
**Korean Player1 dealt 420432423 damage to US Player1**
**Korean Player1 loots AwesomeRareItam**
(DEAD)US Player1: OMG FUCK U
Korean Player1: KEKEKKE ~^________^~
by GLORKAFDS February 3, 2004
An object that is packaged with a video game for no other reason than to make an otherwise unappealing game more appealing to young, uninformed or naive consumers
Person 1: ''Why did they package this game with something that has nothing to do with it?
Person 2: ''Oh thats just a dumb bonus item they bundle with the game so more people buy it.
Person 2: ''Oh thats just a dumb bonus item they bundle with the game so more people buy it.
by NotNanoBurn October 10, 2020
An item that youtubers miss that has little to no value but people show irrational anger towards it being over looked and is referred to sarcastically as the "game winning item" despite its insignificance.
1. Guy1 "I'm unsubbing because I'm tired of him missing every little thing instead of collecting it like a normal human being with brain function would."
Guy2 "Oh no you're right that "game winning item" would have beat the whole game for him why didn't he waste the time to get it -_-."
2. "That item you looked at for five seconds and walked away from like you don't have any damn eyes in your head would have been great to have because I us it all the time."
3. "OMG you IDIOT you just missed that game winning item how will you beat the game now!"
Guy2 "Oh no you're right that "game winning item" would have beat the whole game for him why didn't he waste the time to get it -_-."
2. "That item you looked at for five seconds and walked away from like you don't have any damn eyes in your head would have been great to have because I us it all the time."
3. "OMG you IDIOT you just missed that game winning item how will you beat the game now!"
by Dpowered August 2, 2014
What supermarkets display when they actually mean 'Ten items or fewer'. Indeed 'ten items or less' is gramatical nonsense, has no real meaning and therefore qualifies as slang. That is 'or less' than what?
There are a significant number of shoppers who, when challenged about their (say) eleven items, carefully explain that the sign is gramatically meaningless and therefore not understood /does not conform to the English language.
Usually this is lost on checkout staff /clerks and often not understood by store management either. Indeed it is probably lost on the store-chain management as a whole who probably authorised the nonsensical signs in the first instance.
Higher-end supermarkets have been noted as correctly using the term 'ten items or fewer'.
That an item is not necessarily a singular object is another related issue.
There are a significant number of shoppers who, when challenged about their (say) eleven items, carefully explain that the sign is gramatically meaningless and therefore not understood /does not conform to the English language.
Usually this is lost on checkout staff /clerks and often not understood by store management either. Indeed it is probably lost on the store-chain management as a whole who probably authorised the nonsensical signs in the first instance.
Higher-end supermarkets have been noted as correctly using the term 'ten items or fewer'.
That an item is not necessarily a singular object is another related issue.
Clerk "You shouldn't use this aisle as you have eleven items in your basket and the sign says ten items or less"
Customer "I'm sorry but your sign does not make any sense. As 'or less' is grammatical nonsense I couldn't understand it"
Clerk "Eh?"
Customer "I'm sorry but your sign does not make any sense. As 'or less' is grammatical nonsense I couldn't understand it"
Clerk "Eh?"
by Clansman July 12, 2009