the most amazing person you will ever meet. he is perfect in every way. he is kind, understanding, loving and most of all patient. he would be the best boyfriend and would stop at nothing to make someone happy. he wants everyone to be happy even if he has to put his happiness second and this proves how great of a person he is. lastly, he is so cute and handsome
by liz..3 January 31, 2020
Get the Rizo mug.Piracy Group, Founded in 1985.
(1911 is 777 in the Hexadecimal number system (Base 16). 777 Is the opposite to 666.)
(1911 is 777 in the Hexadecimal number system (Base 16). 777 Is the opposite to 666.)
by aNthraXx January 16, 2004
Get the Razor 1911 mug.Related Words
rizor
• rizored
• razor
• rigor mortis
• Razorback
• razor blades
• rinor
• Razor2k3
• razor ramon
• rizo
1. I was knocked unconscious and rigored last night in the freight elevator.
2. I got rigored today when Joe called in sick to work. Now not only do I have to open the store, but I also have to close the store on my day off!
2. I got rigored today when Joe called in sick to work. Now not only do I have to open the store, but I also have to close the store on my day off!
by JRigor June 28, 2009
Get the Rigored mug.Occam's razor is a logical principle attributed to the mediaeval philosopher William of Occam (or Ockham). The principle states that one should not make more assumptions than the minimum needed. This principle is often called the principle of parsimony. It underlies all scientific modelling and theory building. It admonishes us to choose from a set of otherwise equivalent models of a given phenomenon the simplest one. In any given model, Occam's razor helps us to "shave off" those concepts, variables or constructs that are not really needed to explain the phenomenon. By doing that, developing the model will become much easier, and there is less chance of introducing inconsistencies, ambiguities and redundancies.
Though the principle may seem rather trivial, it is essential for model building because of what is known as the "underdetermination of theories by data". For a given set of observations or data, there is always an infinite number of possible models explaining those same data. This is because a model normally represents an infinite number of possible cases, of which the observed cases are only a finite subset. The non-observed cases are inferred by postulating general rules covering both actual and potential observations.
For example, through two data points in a diagram you can always draw a straight line, and induce that all further observations will lie on that line. However, you could also draw an infinite variety of the most complicated curves passing through those same two points, and these curves would fit the empirical data just as well. Only Occam's razor would in this case guide you in choosing the "straight" (i.e. linear) relation as best candidate model. A similar reasoning can be made for n data points lying in any kind of distribution.
Occam's razor is especially important for universal models such as the ones developed in General Systems Theory, mathematics or philosophy, because there the subject domain is of an unlimited complexity. If one starts with too complicated foundations for a theory that potentially encompasses the universe, the chances of getting any manageable model are very slim indeed. Moreover, the principle is sometimes the only remaining guideline when entering domains of such a high level of abstraction that no concrete tests or observations can decide between rival models. In mathematical modelling of systems, the principle can be made more concrete in the form of the principle of uncertainty maximization: from your data, induce that model which minimizes the number of additional assumptions.
This principle is part of epistemology, and can be motivated by the requirement of maximal simplicity of cognitive models. However, its significance might be extended to metaphysics if it is interpreted as saying that simpler models are more likely to be correct than complex ones, in other words, that "nature" prefers simplicity.
Though the principle may seem rather trivial, it is essential for model building because of what is known as the "underdetermination of theories by data". For a given set of observations or data, there is always an infinite number of possible models explaining those same data. This is because a model normally represents an infinite number of possible cases, of which the observed cases are only a finite subset. The non-observed cases are inferred by postulating general rules covering both actual and potential observations.
For example, through two data points in a diagram you can always draw a straight line, and induce that all further observations will lie on that line. However, you could also draw an infinite variety of the most complicated curves passing through those same two points, and these curves would fit the empirical data just as well. Only Occam's razor would in this case guide you in choosing the "straight" (i.e. linear) relation as best candidate model. A similar reasoning can be made for n data points lying in any kind of distribution.
Occam's razor is especially important for universal models such as the ones developed in General Systems Theory, mathematics or philosophy, because there the subject domain is of an unlimited complexity. If one starts with too complicated foundations for a theory that potentially encompasses the universe, the chances of getting any manageable model are very slim indeed. Moreover, the principle is sometimes the only remaining guideline when entering domains of such a high level of abstraction that no concrete tests or observations can decide between rival models. In mathematical modelling of systems, the principle can be made more concrete in the form of the principle of uncertainty maximization: from your data, induce that model which minimizes the number of additional assumptions.
This principle is part of epistemology, and can be motivated by the requirement of maximal simplicity of cognitive models. However, its significance might be extended to metaphysics if it is interpreted as saying that simpler models are more likely to be correct than complex ones, in other words, that "nature" prefers simplicity.
One should not increase, beyond what is necessary, the number of entities required to explain anything
by onomiyaki July 10, 2005
Get the Occam's razor mug.when you take a long dump, but it has jagged material in it so as it makes it's way through your rectum it really does a number slicing up the walls of your anus.
by billy bats June 11, 2006
Get the razor blade shit mug.by Žiga Bratina September 23, 2020
Get the Rinor Alijaj mug.Kermit's Razor
Named after Kermit the frog who was of course married to Miss Piggy, the principle of Kermit's Razor goes something like: If there are two girls in a dating app bio photo, it usually belongs to the fatter of the two.
Named after Kermit the frog who was of course married to Miss Piggy, the principle of Kermit's Razor goes something like: If there are two girls in a dating app bio photo, it usually belongs to the fatter of the two.
Person 1: "There's two chicks in the tinder bio photos. I can't tell who the profile belongs to."
Person 2: "Kermit's Razor. Odds are it belongs to the larger of the two women."
Person 2: "Kermit's Razor. Odds are it belongs to the larger of the two women."
by Jerzy Radocovid December 12, 2022
Get the Kermit's Razor mug.