The Polarization Fallacy is a logical fallacy used by centrists to claim that both Republicans and Democrats are polarizing the nation. Despite that the fact that the republiturds have moved the the far right while Dems have stayed the same. They usually blame this on the left for refusing to meet right wing extremists half way. When American "centrists" paved the path for right wing extremism in the first place.
What makes them even dumber is that most American "centrists" are actually center to far right compared to the conservative parties of more civilized countries. As the real centrist parties have the word "liberal" in them.
What makes them even dumber is that most American "centrists" are actually center to far right compared to the conservative parties of more civilized countries. As the real centrist parties have the word "liberal" in them.
Examples of the Polarization Fallacy.
Neo-Naz/Trumpanzees/White Christains: WHITE GENOCIDE. WE MUST BRING OTHER RACES TO HEEL BEFORE THEY DO THE SAME DO US. QANON TOLD US SO!
Antifa: Let's not commit genocide. Your violating the bill of rights. So your not only racist that's anti American Fascism.
BLM: Please stop murdering us!
"Centrists": I can't tell these people apart! Democrats need to come back to the middle! The right wouldn't be doing this if the dems weren't such socialists!
Racist: PUT DOWN THE GUN SO I CAN MURDER YOU!
Gun owning non white/ Gun Toting liberal: I have to defend myself, even with lethal force!
"Centrist": Maybe you can let him murder you a little. You don't really need your legs. Stop creating polarization! *gunshots* You didn't have to do that. It only counts as self defense when white men shoot people!
Non white and/or liberal: You're a moron.
Neo-Naz/Trumpanzees/White Christains: WHITE GENOCIDE. WE MUST BRING OTHER RACES TO HEEL BEFORE THEY DO THE SAME DO US. QANON TOLD US SO!
Antifa: Let's not commit genocide. Your violating the bill of rights. So your not only racist that's anti American Fascism.
BLM: Please stop murdering us!
"Centrists": I can't tell these people apart! Democrats need to come back to the middle! The right wouldn't be doing this if the dems weren't such socialists!
Racist: PUT DOWN THE GUN SO I CAN MURDER YOU!
Gun owning non white/ Gun Toting liberal: I have to defend myself, even with lethal force!
"Centrist": Maybe you can let him murder you a little. You don't really need your legs. Stop creating polarization! *gunshots* You didn't have to do that. It only counts as self defense when white men shoot people!
Non white and/or liberal: You're a moron.
by Burn Mar-a-Lago July 21, 2019
Get the Polarization Fallacy mug.The "Git Gud" Fallacy is when a clearly unfair scenario is written off as nothing more than a skill-gap. The fallacy takes place in cases where an individual is naturally better off (meaning they didn't work to be better off with skill or effort) than the person they're facing up against.
For example:
Individuals (A) and (B) aren't capable of having an income and have $0.00 to their name. Somehow, they become contenders in a yacht-buying contest:
Individual (A) receives no money to buy yachts, but the individual (B) receives 1-billion dollars - no strings attached - to spend on the contest...
Who will have to exert more effort to win: Person (A) with no money, or person (B) with 1-billion dollars?
If you think this sounds unfair, then that's the point.
Now, if someone were to say something like, "Well, person (A) should have made better financial decisions so they could beat person (B)," or "Person (A) should've done this, that, or the other thing," that someone would not only be victim blaming, but they would be ignoring the clearly unfair situation and essentially telling the unfortunate person to "GiT GuD," rather than acknowledging that the match-up was never fair in the first place.
For example:
Individuals (A) and (B) aren't capable of having an income and have $0.00 to their name. Somehow, they become contenders in a yacht-buying contest:
Individual (A) receives no money to buy yachts, but the individual (B) receives 1-billion dollars - no strings attached - to spend on the contest...
Who will have to exert more effort to win: Person (A) with no money, or person (B) with 1-billion dollars?
If you think this sounds unfair, then that's the point.
Now, if someone were to say something like, "Well, person (A) should have made better financial decisions so they could beat person (B)," or "Person (A) should've done this, that, or the other thing," that someone would not only be victim blaming, but they would be ignoring the clearly unfair situation and essentially telling the unfortunate person to "GiT GuD," rather than acknowledging that the match-up was never fair in the first place.
"That character is so OP."
"Nah, you just have to learn to fight against them. They're a noob-destroyer."
"If it takes THAT much more effort and skill to learn to fight against THEM SPECIFICALLY, and no other character takes that much concentration to counter, then don't you think they're just OP?
"Bruhhh, lol... just git gud."
"Don't fall for the Git Gud Fallacy..."
(Oh, and not to get too philosophical, but that gif below is a good example of this fallacy because Spongebob is ironically flexing "git gud" into the muscles he didn't work for.)
"Nah, you just have to learn to fight against them. They're a noob-destroyer."
"If it takes THAT much more effort and skill to learn to fight against THEM SPECIFICALLY, and no other character takes that much concentration to counter, then don't you think they're just OP?
"Bruhhh, lol... just git gud."
"Don't fall for the Git Gud Fallacy..."
(Oh, and not to get too philosophical, but that gif below is a good example of this fallacy because Spongebob is ironically flexing "git gud" into the muscles he didn't work for.)
by RandomPhail January 12, 2019
Get the Git Gud Fallacy mug.Related Words
fella
• fellatio
• fellationship
• fellatious
• fellacious
• fellacial
• Fellatial
• Fellatiate
• fellate
• Fellatio Fish
A relationship based soley on oral sex, Another word for BlowJob
Also can be used as Felationship, in lieu of relationship. A felationship involves no intercourse and is strictly felations between two people...
Also can be used as Felationship, in lieu of relationship. A felationship involves no intercourse and is strictly felations between two people...
by Nasty Bowe May 2, 2010
Get the Felations mug.by uttam maharjan December 31, 2010
Get the fallaciloquence mug.by super nuclear mangina March 28, 2010
Get the Asian Felation Sensation mug.by cusebaby September 1, 2009
Get the dirty felando mug.by edboy May 25, 2006
Get the fellacious mug.