Alyssa has Dislexiczism
by Bigboybaseball19 August 1, 2025
Get the Dislexiczism mug.A dialectic in which, over the course of a non-Tarski space, an uncountable set of points called 'Tarski-interior points' yield to an infinite set of points entering the mind non-Tarski space or transfinite-space via supersymmetry.
The infinite set of points enters the transfinite (non-Tarski) space via poly-nominalism from super-symmetry; while the uncountable set exists in the Tarski-interior via sub-lumination uncountable movement from Maya.
In plain English--consideration (path-of-sense) wins over counting (momentous information) in the plane-of-the-mind.
The infinite set of points enters the transfinite (non-Tarski) space via poly-nominalism from super-symmetry; while the uncountable set exists in the Tarski-interior via sub-lumination uncountable movement from Maya.
In plain English--consideration (path-of-sense) wins over counting (momentous information) in the plane-of-the-mind.
Kantianism is a theory of free will in-the-mind.
It relies on an external device called 'aesthetic process judgement' or The Limina, called "forma-spinning."
It argues that; in the mind; sense triumphs over the present moment. This is because consideration is always counting; but counting is not always consideration.
The Kantian dialectic relies on an external device Kant called the 'thing-in-itself' or "free-will-in-itself."
It relies on an external device called 'aesthetic process judgement' or The Limina, called "forma-spinning."
It argues that; in the mind; sense triumphs over the present moment. This is because consideration is always counting; but counting is not always consideration.
The Kantian dialectic relies on an external device Kant called the 'thing-in-itself' or "free-will-in-itself."
by flightfacilities May 12, 2022
Get the Kantian Dialectic mug.Related Words
A framework for understanding societal change as the result of continuous conflict (thesis vs. antithesis) between opposing social forces (e.g., ruling class vs. working class, tradition vs. progress, centralization vs. decentralization), which leads to a new, synthesized state that itself contains new contradictions. It views history not as smooth progress, but as a chain of revolutionary tensions where each resolution births the next conflict.
Example: The Theory of Social Dialectics explains the Industrial Revolution: the thesis (feudal agrarianism) was challenged by the antithesis (emergent capitalist industry), leading to a violent synthesis (the industrial capitalist society). This new synthesis then immediately created its own antithesis: an organized industrial proletariat, leading to the next dialectical conflict (class struggle).
by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 4, 2026
Get the Theory of Social Dialectics mug.