Same shit different outhouse

The situation is the same as before, only now it's happening in a different location.

When Rob came back to the cafe after spending a few months working at that new restaurant downtown, I asked what it was like there. He said, "Same shit different outhouse."

by D. Y. Vetz September 28, 2020

Flag

Get the Same shit different outhousemug.

Different

Everybody on the school bus was nice to the girl next door because she had big jugs by middle school. Everybody except for the one faggot next door.

That guy would be a fuckin faggot even if he didn't go to trial for it, he's the one that didn't compliment her on her tits because he was too busy thinking about dicks to notice. Everybody knew he was always different, like Rudoplh the red nosed reindeer.

by The Original Agahnim October 17, 2021

Flag

Get the Differentmug.

Same shit different bitch

“Same shit different bitch” a term coined by Cobey to describe a scenario where a different scenario results in a similar outcome.

I got a new roomba from a different company but it still doesn’t work. Man “same shit different bitch.”

by Correctmf1 November 5, 2024

Flag

Get the Same shit different bitchmug.

Differences

I just learned about a study that showed that toddlers show antagonism towards other toddlers who show anti-social traits are viewed more favorably. And before your a priori presupposition that the antagonist is in the moral right and you say "As they should." That's why I'm famous and an archetypal figure and the greatest writer of all time! Because YOU (Jordan) displayed anti-social personality traits! I've listed them several times. That's how I've curried their favor. That's all it takes. It doesn't matter if your innocent or guilty no one cares. But wait, (because I'm a genius) there's more! So, let's turn the hands of time forward. As a toddler, anti-social traits might be kicking and biting but AFTER they develop a personality then the traits people are going to be SOCIALLY REWARDED for antagonizing are: Low conscientiousness, low agreeableness, high openness, and maybe low agreeableness. That's why "Bullies feel perfectly justified" in antagonizing their victims. Because they are socially rewarded for it by the people who watch. I've deduced the cause and motivation for bullying. I'm a genius.

Dr JeepJorp "I don't know you! I'm not even asking you questions! I don't care!"

Hym "Exactly! But you HAVE referred to me on several occasions. You read a speech that I wrote and you've clearly instructed your followers to do yhe same. Say... What would they find if the got your phone JeepJorp?"

Hym "I mean the differences between us aren't small at all. On morality, at least, we couldn't be more diametrically opposed. Your's is akin to Ayn Rand's criticism of altruism. But I took that a step farther in saying that the idea that 'people have a responsibility to sacrifice for the greater good' isn't something that applies to YOU. It applies to the people to whom you are speaking. You're TEACHING so you don't have to DO. I think Ayn Rands criticism is correct and I think what you do it worse. You're not sacrificing yourself. You're not even willing to risk sacrificing your reputation to associate with certain people. MY morality, on the other hand, is closer to Peter Singer's conceptualization of morally. Meaning 1. If we have the power to stop something bad from happening without losing something of moral significance, then we must do it. 2. Hunger (I would extend this to all forms of privation), disease, and other forms of disability and death (not entirely on board with this one as it's situationally fine i.e. retard molesting whores) are very bad. Ect. (This breakdown of Peter Singer's proposition is from Jeffrey Kaplan's YouTube channel. Go watch the video. I still don't know about the name thing. Some of you clearly don't want to associate with me. Remember that? Remember when I said that? I was right to leave your name out wasn't I? Yeah...)"

by Hym Iam April 26, 2023

Flag