A logical fallacy wherein someone makes a factual claim (usually complete bullshit, usually prefaced with some version of "some people say...") and then refuses to cite any sources to back up said claim by saying, "Well if you don't believe me, you can just Google it." And then they turn into a complete and total cunt when you point out that the burden of proof rests with the person claiming something to be true, and that no, you are not going to "just Google it."
CuntFace: "I heard that some scientists are saying that BP's wrecked oil pipeline is spilling 1 gajillion barrels of oil into the Gulf of Mexico every second!"
Skeptic: "Oh yeah? What scientists? Who's saying that?"
CuntFace: "People. Some scientists. I heard it on the news. You can Google it."
Skeptic: "Uh, no. Sounds like a load of bullshit to me."
CuntFace: "Well that's what I heard, and if you think I'm lying, then go ahead and google it."
Skeptic: "I don't need to google it to know that: one, "a gajillion barrels of oil every second," is a complete load of shit; and two, you are lying. Otherwise, you wouldn't have resorted to the logical fallacy of refugium ad googlium."
CuntFace: "Refu-jism what?"
Skeptic: "Refugium ad googlum."
CuntFace: "What's that?"
Skeptic: "Why don't you google it and find out? You ignorant twat."
Skeptic: "Oh yeah? What scientists? Who's saying that?"
CuntFace: "People. Some scientists. I heard it on the news. You can Google it."
Skeptic: "Uh, no. Sounds like a load of bullshit to me."
CuntFace: "Well that's what I heard, and if you think I'm lying, then go ahead and google it."
Skeptic: "I don't need to google it to know that: one, "a gajillion barrels of oil every second," is a complete load of shit; and two, you are lying. Otherwise, you wouldn't have resorted to the logical fallacy of refugium ad googlium."
CuntFace: "Refu-jism what?"
Skeptic: "Refugium ad googlum."
CuntFace: "What's that?"
Skeptic: "Why don't you google it and find out? You ignorant twat."
by StanielBlorch May 18, 2010
The sentence that the bringer of the law says when hes about to whip the shit out of you with a 50dmg light parry punish
Non superstes, ad mortem inimicus!
by SlenderMF December 02, 2019
The lowest level of stupidity. So low, that they could be the player in mobile game ads that can’t succeed that the simplest of tasks
Something ain’t right about your friend, hey?
Ya. He tried 3,333 times and still can’t figure out how to sort toys on a mobile game
Who’s Lamborghini?
It’s his. Developers pay him to play their games for their ads. He’s a pro mobile ad gamer
Ya. He tried 3,333 times and still can’t figure out how to sort toys on a mobile game
Who’s Lamborghini?
It’s his. Developers pay him to play their games for their ads. He’s a pro mobile ad gamer
by SithFrosty March 10, 2021
A specific form of ad nauseam resulting from the excessive broadcasting of Geico commercials.
Feelings of disgust or annoyance that result from being exposed to too many Geico promotions.
Feelings of disgust or annoyance that result from being exposed to too many Geico promotions.
by redPooka January 08, 2021
example of mobile game ads:
wAnnA cooL gaemM??????? :)))
u ---> :(
theN plAy oUR Raid Shadow Legends gam!!!
wAnnA cooL gaemM??????? :)))
u ---> :(
theN plAy oUR Raid Shadow Legends gam!!!
by a literal stupid person that makes stupid things February 01, 2023
by Qiqi main:) August 14, 2021
Widać po tobie, że studiujesz z ML.
Użyłem na debacie argumentum ad lebiedzium i szoszo nie zauważył.
Użyłem na debacie argumentum ad lebiedzium i szoszo nie zauważył.
by jagundi March 11, 2022