anarchy

being against all authority, basicly, no laws, not something to be worn by avril posers that dont know what it is..

some..fucked person: hey friend, did you know that that A in a cirlce means avril? its her sign.. its so cool.
friend: oh yeah? cool -writes it on hand-
me: AHHH NOOOOO YOURE WRONGGG!! AHHH

by Anarchy Camper. September 13, 2003

Agarwal

Common Indian surname often confused with Agrawal, Aggarwal, etc. Usually sweet shop owners in a locality.

Get some kaju barfi from Agarwal sweets.

My name is Agarwal, not Agrawal!

by SarcasticIndian October 16, 2016

Agnorant

Agnorant is being so arrogant that whatever you say is true, no matter how ignorant.

Trump is so agnorant, he actually believes that whatever he says or does is completely justified.

by Lornagma July 12, 2017

Anarcho-NATOist

Western leftist that engages in bothsidesism when confronted with any real world geopolitical scenario. Calls themselves a socialist but consistently denounces actually existing socialist states in the name of intellectual nuance, therefore

inadvertently fulfilling the strategic interests of the western imperialism and with that becoming NATO's useful idiots.

YouTuber and peadofile Vaush is the quintessential anarcho-NATOist

by therenegademaster June 6, 2022

anarcho-capitalism

Otherwise known as free market anarchism. The only political philosophy that offers true freedom in all respects - Both politically, and economically. It entails a lack of formal government combined with a completely free market.

Anarcho-capitalism is the most viable form of anarchism.

by Totallynotaraper September 13, 2011

anarchy

Something that, currently, has become over popular. Everyone seems to have an anarchy tattoos or has written it on something or has bought something with it on there. IF YOU BUY SOMETHING WITH THE ANARCHY SYMBOL ON IT YOU ARE SUPPORTING THE GOVERNMENT BECAUSE THEY ARE PROFITING FROM WHAT YOU BOUGHT!

Anarchy is everywhere.

by all angelic eyes August 2, 2005

Anarchy

Literally, society without government. Initially, it would likely be chaotic, and violent, but may stabilize into a safe system eventually. All this is hypothetical, because there's been no long lasting, large scale example to draw precident from.

Without the police, we would have anarchy.

by Psiberzerker April 11, 2004