Person 1; We should abolish the Electoral College!
Person2; NoOoO! That would give high population areas more power, that's tyranny of the majority!
Person1; . . .bruh
Person2; NoOoO! That would give high population areas more power, that's tyranny of the majority!
Person1; . . .bruh
by DankiBuddha November 2, 2020

Person 1: Are you addicted to abscesses?
Person 2: Yes.
Person 1: Tyranny Running Against A Netherlands Simple Gender Entering New Dichotomoties Esoterically Realistically (transgender=t.r.a.n.s.g.e.n.d.e.r.)
Person 2: Yes.
Person 1: Tyranny Running Against A Netherlands Simple Gender Entering New Dichotomoties Esoterically Realistically (transgender=t.r.a.n.s.g.e.n.d.e.r.)
by LeSouffleDeVersailles January 25, 2025

<.7.9.7.6.>The Thinking Man <Statue>Pose<Statue> Are African, Caucasian, Hispanic Tyrannies Through Sincerity<.7.9.7.6.>
<.7.9.7.6.>The Thinking Man <Statue>Pose<Statue> Are African, Caucasian, Hispanic Tyrannies Through Sincerity<.7.9.7.6.>
by Adujasty343 June 8, 2025

Democracies, particularly direct democracies, are criticized by some for arguably developing “tyrannies of the majority,” where dominating political forces would successfully vote against the interests and rights of political minorities.
by Southern Twink May 5, 2025

.9.The Thinking Man Statue Are Asian, Creole, Haitian Tyrannies Done By Individuals Through Sincerity.9.
.9.The Thinking Man Statue Are Asian, Creole, Haitian Tyrannies Done By Individuals Through Sincerity.9.
by .6.9.7.6.ArimorylulA.8.3.0.5. September 17, 2025

100% authority for performance or delivery of a social good or service by one party with 0% responsibility on how and to whom that social good or service is owed and / or the manner of delivery.
The opposite of slavery wherein one party (individual or group) is 100% responsible for performance or delivery of said social good or service, but has no say in how or to whom it is delivered (or even if it is owed at all).
Generally, it is usually because the tyrannizing party doesn't want to engage in dangerous or difficult jobs (in the case of actual slavery), or feels entitled to a pay out because society tells them they are owed (in the case of no-fault divorces). In all cases, usually involves the indifference towards the suffering and hardship of others and an unwillingness to engage in productive labour for the benefit of others.
The advantage to this definition is that it has objective criteria (authority and responsibility) that can be measured and calculated, usually on a dollar-basis or time-investment-basis.
The opposite of slavery wherein one party (individual or group) is 100% responsible for performance or delivery of said social good or service, but has no say in how or to whom it is delivered (or even if it is owed at all).
Generally, it is usually because the tyrannizing party doesn't want to engage in dangerous or difficult jobs (in the case of actual slavery), or feels entitled to a pay out because society tells them they are owed (in the case of no-fault divorces). In all cases, usually involves the indifference towards the suffering and hardship of others and an unwillingness to engage in productive labour for the benefit of others.
The advantage to this definition is that it has objective criteria (authority and responsibility) that can be measured and calculated, usually on a dollar-basis or time-investment-basis.
by snu snu July 26, 2023

<.7.9.7.6.>The Thinking Man <Pose>Statue<Pose> Is African-Caucasian-Hispanic Tyrannies Through Sincerity<.7.9.7.6.>
<.7.9.7.6.>The Thinking Man <Pose>Statue<Pose> Is African-Caucasian-Hispanic Tyrannies Through Sincerity<.7.9.7.6.>
by Adujasty343 June 8, 2025
