by sammykinzandabster June 27, 2009
On urbandictionary.com, the people who are responsible for approving or denying definition submissions but take WAY too long (at least weeks) for one or both of two reasons: they're lazy and don't really care, or there aren't enough of them to handle all of the submissions, of which I'm sure there is an overwhelming amount.
I think it's been almost a whole month since I submitted a few definitions, and it still says "Your submission is under review by editors" for all of them. I doubt they were denied because they didn't include anything that could possibly offend anyone, advertising, names, even personal opinions, or anything against urbandictionary.com's guidelines.
by annoyed with November 03, 2007
1. A person who edits, make changes to or proposes changes and helps maintain some sort of content.
2. The type of person who is going to publish this definition. *ahem!*
2. The type of person who is going to publish this definition. *ahem!*
by Sid Barrett July 01, 2007
(specifically Urban Dictionary editor:)
YOU.
If only you're willing to put in volunteer time judging individually whether or not thousands of definition submittals conform to the specific criteria clearly delineated to QC this site.
<Click the EDIT tab to view the simple common sense parameters.>
YOU.
If only you're willing to put in volunteer time judging individually whether or not thousands of definition submittals conform to the specific criteria clearly delineated to QC this site.
<Click the EDIT tab to view the simple common sense parameters.>
SOMEONE TOLD ME: "Quit whining you dullard. If you're so qualified in writing your definition, then why not volunteer as a UD EDITOR and help weed out the crap 'definitions'."
(As an EDITOR, I obviously help to vote myself in. Ya smell what I'm cookin'?)
(As an EDITOR, I obviously help to vote myself in. Ya smell what I'm cookin'?)
by Chengo Bolemongo October 06, 2006
by ed-it-or March 22, 2005
Gatekeeper for the information world. Someone who allows or withholds and alters information whether to publication in a magazine, books or online, at their discretion. Often erroneously or to favour their own views.
The editors of urban dictionary are useless, they have like sixteen almost identical definitions for the same word, and most seem to be rants, and nobody can spell... Never mind eh?...
Don't believe what you read in the paper, the editor in chief is a left wing nutter and you'll rever get the full story, a lie by omission is still a lie...
Don't believe what you read in the paper, the editor in chief is a left wing nutter and you'll rever get the full story, a lie by omission is still a lie...
by SpeltWong February 16, 2012
The people that approve of the definitions you post before it appears on Urban Dictionary. 75% of them are assholes that reject everything. They are responsible for most of your definitions that don't make it and rot.
Guy: Dog; an canine animal that barks
*5-90 Minutes later*
*Gets E-mail saying "Dog was not published"*
Guy: Those motherfucking editors are bitches sometimes.
*5-90 Minutes later*
*Gets E-mail saying "Dog was not published"*
Guy: Those motherfucking editors are bitches sometimes.
by Pokedex #184 August 20, 2017