Ethan Herbst

1: Easiest of pickings
2: Only minor on earth to have a mining operation going on, on his chest.

1: Ethan Herbst is easy pickings
2: Ethan has a quarry sized hole on his chest

by The Baxter March 4, 2024

Ethan Hamby

Ethan Hamby is the leader of the Boerne Bam Boys (BBB) he wants to be a deer cowboy really bad but he is always on vacation.

Ethan Hamby doesn’t actually work he just says he does, must be nice

by BBB ANONYMOUS March 7, 2024

Ethan

What you call a certain type of friend, even and especially if their name isn't Ethan. That really epic super close friend who seems to always have your back, and always have the perfect advice. They are secretly pulling the strings, orchestrating the perfect solution to whatever problem you're dealing with. Will always listen to what you have to say, and will always brighten the situation with a great joke. Everyone needs an Ethan.

Get yourself an Ethan.

by demonic-ducks March 10, 2024

Ethan

A complete and total homosexual

Ethan is gay

by Norbert March 10, 2024

Ethan

Being "Ethan" is equal to being underdeveloped in the frontal cortex.

Guy1: You're so ethan
Guy2: inki pinki ponki

by Kjydlonge March 11, 2024

Ethical Emotivism

Your faux ethical dilemma regarding the organ transplant can only exist in a vaccum (Though you may be right that people do ENGAGE IN ethical emotivism). As I see it, your proposition isn't a singular linear line of reasoning. How you're thinking about it seems to be this: If you can -1 to +5 should you do that. But really your proposition is the intersection of several constituent elements regarding personal property rights (Does the person own their organs), consent (Is it ethical to take something from someone else without consent), authority (Is it ethical for a "We" to have authority over an individual). So, if yes (you ought to take the organs) do you have to reconcile with the constituent elements of the proposition? If it's ethical for "a group to take the organs from 1 to save 5 people" is it, then, also ethical for "a group to take the property of an individual without their consent" (in a broader sense)? Or are you just making a 1 time exception for this guy? Or is whether or not it's ethical contingent on what you're taking and whether or not you're saving lives? You see the distinction I'm trying to make, right? Maybe I'm not understanding it properly.

Hym "To me it just sounds like a repackaging of the trolley problem. And I don't see how it's incompatible with utilitarianism because if you aim to maximize pleasure then it's either a total of 1 unit of pleasure (1 person who continues to live so they can experience pleasure) or 5 units... Maybe I'm misinterpreting what you're saying... I guess the distinction between the trolly problem and your thing IS the intersection of constituent elements. Rather than just deciding whether or not to switch the tracks you're deliberately putting a guy ON THE TRACK. So it's a little more direct I guess... You're slightly more culpable in the outcome... That's a good one though. That aside, I think ethical emotivism is something people engage in rather than the default. I do still think you can create a mathematical ethical scale. Like my thing! I kill a kid (-2), you kill me (-1), I get my stuff back (+1). That's all I got for now. Bring it back up later maybe I'll come up with something else. Hopefully that isn't too incoherent to understand."

by Hym Iam March 14, 2024

ethan

gay

ethan is gay

by sharkasaurus99 March 24, 2024