An apparently unprovable hypothesis that living creatures were created by an all-powerful,
intelligent entity that itself did not have a creator. Contrast with evolution. ID proponents typically fail to
understand 4 things:
1) Scientists use the word "theory" differently than the layperson
2) Science operates just fine in the absence of absolute truths. Thus, if evolutionary theory doesn't explain everything, that's not a problem - it's a "work in progress"
3) People are no better off substituting a slightly imperfect
scientific theory for a completely unsupported religious hypothesis
4) The fact that ID cannot be disproven is a weakness, not a strength (e.g. There are 482,331 raisins orbiting Saturn right now... I defy you to prove me wrong).
If
Intelligent Design is such a great
alternative explanation to evolutionary theory, why aren't proponents actually USING it to advance scientific
understanding? In short, they should practice what they preach... literally.