Parking The Bus

A defensive soccer strategy where a team stacks every single player in front of their own goal, making it nearly impossible for the other team to score. Basically turning the pitch into a crowded parking lot with no exits.

Chelsea spent the whole second half parking the bus instead of actually attacking

by ethanvmmm September 9, 2025

Parking The Bus

A soccer strategy where a team puts every single player in front of their own goal, making it almost impossible for the other team to score.

Manchester spent the whole second half parking the bus instead of actually attacking

by ethanvmmm September 9, 2025

Cut the butter

Another fire ass way to say cut the shit, you're lying!! some people follow it up by saying "no cheese" (aka no cap)

Noah: u guys 3 girls gave me their number today
Emilu: cut the butter
Noah: no cheese

by rawshiiiit September 19, 2025

Moving the Bullpost

The practice of shifting the criteria for what counts as "bullshit" after your opponent has already demonstrated that their argument meets your previous standards. First, you call their argument bullshit. They provide sources. You move the bullpost: "Those sources are bullshit." They provide different sources. You move again: "Your interpretation of those sources is bullshit." They explain their interpretation. You move again: "The whole field is bullshit." The bullpost keeps moving because the goal isn't to evaluate truth—it's to maintain the position that the other person is wrong, no matter what. Moving the bullpost is the favorite tactic of people who have decided that reality itself is bullshit when it doesn't agree with them.

Moving the Bullpost Example: "She cited a peer-reviewed study. He moved the bullpost: 'Peer review is bullshit.' She cited government data. He moved again: 'Government data is bullshit.' She cited his own past statements. He moved again: 'I was wrong then, and that's bullshit too.' There was no source, no evidence, no argument that could satisfy him, because the bullpost was not about evidence—it was about maintaining the position that she was wrong. She stopped trying. He declared victory."

by AbzuInExile February 16, 2026

Shifting the Burden

The tactic of moving the burden of proof from the one making a claim to the one questioning it. Shifting the burden is what happens when someone says "prove me wrong" instead of supporting their own position. It's the logic of "you can't prove God doesn't exist, so he does," of "you can't prove vaccines are safe, so they're dangerous." Shifting the burden inverts the normal rules of argument, putting the challenger in the impossible position of proving a negative. The cure is recognizing that the burden of proof lies with the positive claim, not with its critics. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, not extraordinary skepticism.

Shifting the Burden Example: "He claimed the election was stolen. When asked for evidence, he shifted the burden: 'Prove it wasn't.' She couldn't prove a negative; that's not how proof works. But shifting the burden had worked: now she was on the defensive, trying to disprove his unsupported claim. The argument was upside down, and he liked it that way."

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 17, 2026

The 8 Axes of the Bullshit Spectrum

A framework for evaluating bullshit along eight key dimensions. The 8 axes are: 1) Truth-Indifference (how little the speaker cares about truth), 2) Evidence-Deficit (how unsupported the claim is), 3) Plausibility (how believable the claim is on its face), 4) Motivation (what the speaker gains from the bullshit), 5) Harm Potential (how much damage the bullshit can cause), 6) Virality (how likely it is to spread), 7) Resistance to Correction (how hard it is to debunk), and 8) Systemicity (whether it's isolated bullshit or part of a larger bullshit system). These axes allow for nuanced evaluation of bullshit, distinguishing between different types and degrees.

The 8 Axes of the Bullshit Spectrum *Example: "They stopped just calling things 'bullshit' and started mapping them on the 8 axes. The advertising claim was high on truth-indifference, low on harm potential. The conspiracy theory was high on everything—truth-indifference, harm, virality, resistance. The axes showed why one was annoying and the other dangerous—and why responding required different strategies."*

by Dumu The Void March 7, 2026

The 16 Axes of the Bullshit Spectrum

An expanded framework adding eight dimensions for even more nuanced bullshit evaluation. The additional axes include: 9) Intentionality (whether the bullshit is deliberate or the speaker is self-deceived), 10) Audience (who the bullshit targets), 11) Cultural Resonance (how well it fits existing beliefs), 12) Emotional Appeal (how much it leverages emotion), 13) Identity Loading (how tied it is to group identity), 14) Institutional Embeddedness (whether it's backed by institutions), 15) Historical Persistence (how long it's been around), and 16) Refutability (whether it can be effectively countered). The 16 axes provide a comprehensive bullshit analysis toolkit.

The 16 Axes of the Bullshit Spectrum *Example: "The conspiracy theory was off the charts on most axes—high truth-indifference, high harm, high virality, high identity loading. But on intentionality, it was mixed: some promoters knew it was bullshit; some believed it. The 16 axes showed the complexity: different strategies needed for different bullshitters. The theory wasn't just bullshit; it was a system."*

by Dumu The Void March 7, 2026