Similar to a double standard, but with an added dimension. This term specifically relates to how individuals operate in a developed country, particularly in a judgemental community/institution. This term also relates to people who are highly individualistic, who could really make more of an effort to assist others, but don't.
For example, there is a difference between what people say, do, and think. They might speak of one thing, have a different motive then they suggest, and do something totally different then they say they would do in a given situation.
This term can complement 'two-faced', but in this situation the person is 'three-faced'. One thing is objective: they are out for themselves
For example, there is a difference between what people say, do, and think. They might speak of one thing, have a different motive then they suggest, and do something totally different then they say they would do in a given situation.
This term can complement 'two-faced', but in this situation the person is 'three-faced'. One thing is objective: they are out for themselves
many university professors exhibit the 'triple standard'. you would assume they care about their students, but many really don't. they might say they would help/listen to you, but dont. and they might lead you to believe something that isnt true just because they enjoy authority and power.
by studytipsforYOU December 31, 2011
Get the triple standard mug.Like stage fright, only with standardized tests. One who suffers from Standardized Test Fright fears going into the testing room, having other students stare at them, and Musk Oxen.
To prep for his SAT & ACT tests, Allan perfected first his mind, then his body, utilizing every trick he could find to rid himself of his Standardized Test Fright and assume his rightful place, as the Chosen One.
by old_standardized_tester November 5, 2018
Get the Standardized Test Fright mug.Related Words
The practice by females of using female sex as a disability instead of doing the right thing and litigating for the responsibility of selective service.
There are more lesbians in the state of Florida litigating for the responsibility of adoptive motherhood than there are women throughout the United States litigating for the responsibility of selective service.
Males cannot challenge the constitutionality of all-male selective service because they cannot specificially request in their lawsuit a particular ruling that changes military policy.
Women will try to use every bullshit argument when confronted with their own selfishness. Some women have the nerve to call selective service an "artifact," saying it was used "as far back as 1973". Archeologists do not look for artifacts from 34 years ago and the penalties for non-compliance with selective service registration will be enforced for the forseeable future.
Women will try to say that women do not owe men anything despite:
1) the fact that mostly male politicians ratified the 19th Amendment,
2) gave women Title IX (which eviscerated men's sports, contrary to what that cunt Donna Lopiano would like you to believe),
3) refused (in 15 states, most notably Illinois) to ratify the Equal Rights Amendment because women balked (again, most notably in Illinois) at losing their free ride during wartime,
4) made sure that women would be paid the same amount of money for doing the same work as a similar man (so a woman who has never been married and has no kids would make as much money as a man who has also never been married and has no kids)
and 5) legalized no-fault divorce, most of which are initiated by women for spurious reasons, leading to men with almost no custody of their children and whorebag, I mean, ex-wife, I mean "child support" payments that the ex-wife can spend on an SUV despite having children who will not get their learner's permits for a decade.
Women's refusal to demand responsibilities is indicative of how immoral feminism is in the United States. There is nothing communist or fascist or unpatriotic about feeling that responsibilities should apply to everybody.
There are more lesbians in the state of Florida litigating for the responsibility of adoptive motherhood than there are women throughout the United States litigating for the responsibility of selective service.
Males cannot challenge the constitutionality of all-male selective service because they cannot specificially request in their lawsuit a particular ruling that changes military policy.
Women will try to use every bullshit argument when confronted with their own selfishness. Some women have the nerve to call selective service an "artifact," saying it was used "as far back as 1973". Archeologists do not look for artifacts from 34 years ago and the penalties for non-compliance with selective service registration will be enforced for the forseeable future.
Women will try to say that women do not owe men anything despite:
1) the fact that mostly male politicians ratified the 19th Amendment,
2) gave women Title IX (which eviscerated men's sports, contrary to what that cunt Donna Lopiano would like you to believe),
3) refused (in 15 states, most notably Illinois) to ratify the Equal Rights Amendment because women balked (again, most notably in Illinois) at losing their free ride during wartime,
4) made sure that women would be paid the same amount of money for doing the same work as a similar man (so a woman who has never been married and has no kids would make as much money as a man who has also never been married and has no kids)
and 5) legalized no-fault divorce, most of which are initiated by women for spurious reasons, leading to men with almost no custody of their children and whorebag, I mean, ex-wife, I mean "child support" payments that the ex-wife can spend on an SUV despite having children who will not get their learner's permits for a decade.
Women's refusal to demand responsibilities is indicative of how immoral feminism is in the United States. There is nothing communist or fascist or unpatriotic about feeling that responsibilities should apply to everybody.
The refusal of women to demand selective service reveals American feminism's double standard of equality between men and women at the top but female superiority at the bottom.
by Someone who doesn't use male sex as a disability July 22, 2007
Get the double standard mug.noun. a time system which homosexuals use. it is often half an hour to an hour latter than the standard time.
it is usual for a homo to run on HST to allow more time to drink, primp, have sex or generally slack off before going to a party or function. they also think it is fashionable to show up late, even though they know they'll show up with every other homo too.
it is usual for a homo to run on HST to allow more time to drink, primp, have sex or generally slack off before going to a party or function. they also think it is fashionable to show up late, even though they know they'll show up with every other homo too.
The cocktail party for Ted and Billy's wedding was at 7:00pm, but all their gay friends were running on Homo Standard Time and showed up at 8.
by JP_002 February 1, 2007
Get the homo standard time mug.The most hottest, funniest , standard , and best youtuber in the world! Often gets comments on how perfect his teeth are, and likes to make fun of hipsters and triangles! He is also impossible not to love!
by totsmaggots March 23, 2010
Get the standardtristan mug.by a person from windsor with canabalistic tendencies January 10, 2005
Get the social standard mug.The general idea that the story you get out of an event (eg. wild college party) is better than the moral value of whatever has taken place. This phrase implies that the more exciting or scandalous story you have to tell, the better! Live it up:)
Allison: Man, that sure was one crazy party last night. We almost got arrested!
Ashley: Yep, stories not standards gurrrl!
Ashley: Yep, stories not standards gurrrl!
by MissParty June 20, 2011
Get the Stories Not Standards mug.