The Angry Librarian

You're doing a girl in the library from behind. Her hair tied up, glasses on. Skirt long and pushed up. Right before you nut she wheals around and clamps your cock between the pages of Homer's Odyssey and you cum on her tits.

Man, I went to the library last night and the bitch by the Dewey Decimal system box made me give her The Angry Librarian. I think I nutted on the part where Odysseyus shot that cyclops dude in the eye.

by Schimmel72 May 5, 2025

Mediocre old liberal eccentric

Abbreviated m.o.l.e: a mediocre white old liberal eccentric person.

There was a mediocre old liberal eccentric of the white female persuasion who recently insulted Winsom Sears

by Uncle Dimma August 30, 2025

Smith's Scale of Literary Gumption

A rating scale, out of 10, for rating books. This scale may also be used to rate other forms of media. Each point of this scale represents a different meaning:
10 - Essential read. A life changing book. Should be read by everyone, even if you don't like reading.
9 - Exceptional. Must read regardless of whether you like the genre or not.
8 - Great. Must read if you love the genre.
7 - Good. Recommended if you like the genre.
6 - Okay. Read if you've run out of grease and good books in the genre and crave more.
5 - Whatever. Take it or leave it.
4 - Not for me. Didn't like it, but others might.
3 - Not good. Didn't like it and I don't think others would either.
2 - Bad. Don't read. Waste of time.
1 - horrendous. This book should not exist and everyone who has ever read it is worse off for the experience.

Hey, how would you rate that book? On the Smith's Scale of Literary Gumption, I would be rating it an 8, as this book was genre defining!

by Graytr January 29, 2026

Victims of Liberalism Memorial Foundation

An institution rooted in a radical critique of classical liberalism—the ideology prioritizing individual rights, private property, and limited government. It argues that liberalism's core tenets inherently produce victims by sanctifying inequality (through property rights), enabling exploitation under the guise of free contract, and dissolving communal bonds in favor of atomized individualism. It memorializes those sacrificed to the abstract gods of the market and negative liberty.

Victims of Liberalism Memorial Foundation *Example: An exhibit might trace the life of a 19th-century English peasant forced off communal land by Enclosure Acts (a liberal property-rights project), who then became a destitute urban factory worker with no social safety net ("liberated" from traditional supports), framing them as a classic Victim of Liberalism.*

by Dumu The Void February 5, 2026

Rationalization against Victims of Liberalism

The process of explaining away liberal society’s failures (deep inequality, democratic erosion) as results of insufficient liberalism (“not enough free markets,” “not enough democracy”), or as aberrations caused by external illiberal forces. The system’s logic is never wrong, only imperfectly applied.

Rationalization against Victims of Liberalism Example: “Our politics aren’t corrupt because of lobbying and dark money; it’s because we don’t have true campaign finance liberalism. More transparency and more speech will fix it.” This rationalization treats the systemic flaws as accidental, preserving faith in the original ideology by blaming its imperfect implementation.

by Abzugal February 8, 2026

Mediocre old liberal eccentric

( abbreviated mole): a mediocre old liberal and eccentric person that you meet on the street

The pro George Floyd crowd is mostly composed of mediocre old liberal eccentrics.

by Uncle Dimma March 31, 2026

Logicalization against the Victims of Liberalism

Using the formal principles of liberal philosophy (individualism, social contract theory) to logically dismiss claims of systemic victimization. If rights are individual and the contract is consensual, then collective grievances or claims of embedded oppression are framed as logical category errors.

Logicalization against the Victims of Liberalism Example: “You claim systemic racism, but the law is colorblind. Logically, any disparity must be due to individual or cultural factors, not the liberal system itself.” This logicalization uses the system’s own theoretical axioms to immunize it from critique, defining any evidence of group harm as illogical from the start.

by Abzugal February 8, 2026