Video Game Community

A video game community is a group of gamers that get together either online or in person to play a game.

Hey John, "Do you want to join the Video Game Community", its where we get together argue about different things like our life depends on it.

by anonymous September 9, 2025

The international community

Well, it's good to know that if they ever finally carry out baby-dick genocide...

Hym "The international community will sit there and bloviate about it for years while doing ultimately nothing. All of that talk about the holocaust and they found themselves completely unprepared to do anything about the thing they DECLARED to be genocide. They DECLARED it guys. For 2 years. THAT is what they did the whole time and it looked like this:"

UN 😲👉 "I DECLARE THIS GENOCIDE! Tell everyone I declared it genocide."

Hym "....................... 🤨 Are you going to do something here?"

UN "I've done it. It's been declared."

Hym "Uh- ................ Ok. I guess I just masterbated the whole time so.... What did everybody do? We'll do an audit. Lady? Show of hands for 'get a baby fucked into you?' Candy? Brett? There's 2. Who's got "just getting stretched for the fun of it?' Ok. Alright... Um, well, at least they they were able to identify it correctly."

by Hym Iam October 14, 2025

Theory of Concrete and Imaginary Communities

A sociological framework that distinguishes communities based on the source of their cohesion. A Concrete Community is bound by direct, tangible, ongoing interaction—a village, a workplace, a neighborhood. An Imaginary Community (building on Benedict Anderson's "imagined community") is bound by a shared idea in the minds of its members, despite little or no personal contact—a nation, a diaspora, fans of a global franchise. The theory examines how the "imagined" can generate very concrete feelings of belonging, obligation, and even sacrifice.

Theory of Concrete and Imaginary Communities Example: Your apartment building residents' association is a Concrete Community; you know your neighbors, argue over garbage, and share a physical space. Your identity as an "American" or a "Bitcoin maximalist" is membership in an Imaginary Community. You'll never meet most fellow members, but you feel a powerful, abstract kinship that can influence your politics, risk tolerance, and sense of self, proving the "imagined" is a potent social force.

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 6, 2026

Justification against Victims of Anti-communism

The direct argument that the persecution, violence, and human rights abuses committed in the name of combating communism—such as coups, death squads, blacklisting, and repression—were necessary, righteous, or defensive actions. It frames victims (union organizers, leftist intellectuals, peasant movements) as legitimate threats to national security, social order, or "the free world," whose suffering was a justified cost of preventing a greater totalitarian evil.

Justification against Victims of Anti-communism Example: Defending the CIA-backed overthrow of a democratically elected socialist president by arguing, "We had to stop a communist domino effect in the hemisphere. Sure, the dictatorship that followed was harsh, but it prevented a Cuba-style regime and saved the country from total Marxist tyranny." This justification explicitly endorses the violent suppression of a political alternative as a moral and strategic imperative.

by Abzugal February 8, 2026

Rationalization against Victims of Anti-communism

The cognitive process of explaining away the human cost of anti-communist campaigns by appealing to the geopolitical anxieties, ideological fervor, or "complexities" of the Cold War (or its modern equivalents). It treats state violence as an understandable, if regrettable, overreaction to a perceived existential threat, removing active moral responsibility by citing the pressures of the era or the provocations of the targeted groups.

Rationalization against Victims of Anti-communism Example: A historian arguing, "While the Vietnam War led to immense civilian casualties, it must be understood within the context of the U.S. policy of containment, which was a rational response to monolithic communist expansion as perceived at the time." This rationalization does not celebrate the harm but drains it of its human horror, transforming burned villages and massacres into abstract outcomes of a "rational" strategic doctrine.

by Abzugal February 8, 2026

Logicalization against the Victims of Anti-communism

The application of a cold, pseudo-logical deduction to argue that victims of anti-communist persecution were, in fact, architects of their own fate. It constructs syllogisms based on the premise that communism is an inherent threat, therefore anyone associated with it logically forfeited their rights or safety. It frames persecution as a predictable, even legally sound, consequence of the victim's own ideological choices.

Logicalization against the Victims of Anti-communism Example: "Premise 1: The Communist Party advocated for the overthrow of the government. Premise 2: You were a member or sympathizer. Conclusion: Therefore, your blacklisting, deportation, or imprisonment was not persecution, but a logical and legal consequence of your subversive allegiance." This logicalization uses a political premise as an axiomatic truth to "prove" that victims were not wronged, but merely experienced the logical outcome of their own dangerous beliefs.

by Abzugal February 8, 2026

Trivialization against the Victims of Anti-communism

The rhetorical minimization of anti-communist persecution, either by mocking its severity, reducing it to a historical curiosity, or treating its contemporary legacy as a joke. It dismisses the lasting trauma of blacklists, ruined lives, and state violence as "ancient history," "political correctness," or the over-sensitive whining of "tankies" and losers, thereby preventing serious moral reckoning.

Trivialization against the Victims of Anti-communism *Example: Responding to a discussion about the millions killed in the anti-communist massacres in Indonesia in 1965-66 with a comment like, "Old news. Should we also cry about every medieval war? Move on." Or, making light of the McCarthy era with a meme about "naming names" at a Hollywood party. This trivialization treats genocide and political terror as trivial footnotes or edgy humor, actively stripping them of their gravity and ongoing political relevance.*

by Abzugal February 8, 2026