ipod nano 

The newest, smallest, and sleekest of Apples line of iPods. Thinner than a pencil, still has a full color display and is available in 2 or 4 GB models. Is available in both black and white.
The key is that is uses a flash memory drive instead of a hard drive, for increased battery life.
For only $200, it renders pretty much all other music players obsolete.

"Wow, the new ipod nano i just got is amazing... i wonder what apple will come out with next."

"I just threw away my dell jukebox to get an ipod nano, and wow it is so much better...."

ipod nano by Rush8192 September 26, 2005

ipod nano 

A high quality, ultra-compact MP3 player. Perhaps overpriced. Fits in the stereotype of Apple - slightly higher priced, but much higher software and hardware quality. Just because many of its trendwhore owners are ignorant fools doesn't give you permission to hate it or be, in your opinion, non-conformist.

Geoff: The $250 price tag is a complete waste of money when you could get a creative player or an iPod mini that holds more songs for less.
Me: You can't tell me the Creative matches the quality of construction or software compatibility. iTunes, anyone?

Bas: $199 for a 2GB player? Or $179 for a 4GB Zen Micro? Or pay a premium $250 for an iriver H10 that has 150% more space and a nice design as well?
Me: Once again I point to software quality. The iRivers (cheap knockoff in more than one way) have bad interfaces and slower image loading times.

Pledet: "I sat on my ipod nano and broke it in two."
Me: You also sat on your walkman, shattering it and sending high-speed disc fragments up, in, and through your digestive system.

ipod nano by Barcode711 April 19, 2007

iPod nano 

Finally. We've all waited for it.

iPod nano: The world's first disposable mp3 player.

iPod nano by cynical1 October 9, 2005

iPod nano 

New iPod to replace the existing iPod mini. It is the exact same thing except it is thinner, has a color screen, and comes in black. The $250 price tag is a complete waste of money when you could get a creative player or an iPod mini that holds more songs for less. Even though it is a complete waste of money many trendwhores (like myself) are still buying into apple's genius marketing.

Guy 1: Hey I got a new iPod nano
Guy 2: OMGWTFBBQ NO WAY I HEAR IT HOLDS A THOUSAND SONGS!
Guy 1: Uhh, yeah but doesn't your iRiver H320® hold 4 times as many songs?
Guy 2: But your's is thin and comes in 2 different colors! OMG! *snaps iriver in half*

iPod nano by Geeeeeeeeeoff September 28, 2005

ipod nano 

iPod nano = waste of money. $199 for a 2GB player? Or $179 for a 4GB Zen Micro? Or pay a premium $250 for an iriver H10 that has 150% more space and a nice design as well?
I know which one I'd pick. Hint: it isn't the Apple product. God, I hate Apple, and the arrogant bastards that own the iPod. You know your product isn't very good when one of the major arguments for iPod's greatness is that it's expensive.

Most conversations with iPod fanboys go like this:
Person 1: "Check this out! I bought an iPod Nano! I'm soooo cool!!!!11!'
Person 2: "You moron, there's cheaper, and higher quality players out there."
Person 1: "You're just jealous because you can't afford one! Nanananananana!"
*a piano falls on person 1's head*

ipod nano by Bas September 23, 2005

ipod nano 

Smallest and most exspensive new age walk-man. But it is no where as durable as the original wlk-man and breaks if dropped more than 3 inchs.

"I sat on my ipod nano and broke it in two."

ipod nano by pledet October 3, 2005

iPod nano 

Replaced the iPod mini. Basically the same thing except thinner.

iPod nano is a thinner iPod mini.

iPod nano by myselfrocks September 15, 2005