A term used to describe one's preparedness to engage in a certain activity, most often associated with drinking.
by vaeren May 21, 2007
Get the flight status mug.When you write a simple comment, or you like someones status on a social netowrking website, mostly Facebook and you receive a multitude of notifications from other people's comments. Its at this point you realize how stupid it was to comment.
1. "I liked his status and now I have 50 notifications. Its become a Toxic Status!"
2. "I just commented on his status. oh a notification, another one, another one, when will they end! No I have been infected by the toxic status."
2. "I just commented on his status. oh a notification, another one, another one, when will they end! No I have been infected by the toxic status."
by Frustrated Facebook November 12, 2009
Get the Toxic Status mug.Related Words
Statum
• status
• Statue of Liberty
• statutory rape
• Statue
• status quo
• Status Rape
• statustician
• statusfied
• Status-Bomb
One's being at a low point for a certain amount of time, whether its lack of socialism/swag/employment status.
1.Ray: "Yo you here from D at all? That motherfucka fell off the grid mane?". TJ: "Yea that niggas been playin that Call of Duty shit online 24/7, that dudz on fuckin "BUM-STATUS" right now".
2. D: "Yo TJ did Ray find a job yet?"
TJ: "Nah that nigga don't do shit now, bitchz on bum-status and shit....real talk".
2. D: "Yo TJ did Ray find a job yet?"
TJ: "Nah that nigga don't do shit now, bitchz on bum-status and shit....real talk".
by osmitchof08 August 23, 2011
Get the Bum-status mug.by Albyno Ryno October 9, 2011
Get the Stamos Status mug.An Object that shows off your wealth. Could be a car, house, a boat, jewelry. Status symbols change over the centuries.
by Atotheic February 2, 2008
Get the STATUS SYMBOL mug.The act of hijacking someone's Facebook status through posting a massive amount of random comments in a conversational format.
This requires at least two people, as solo Status Bombing just makes you look like a dick.
Status Bombing should not resemble 'spam' in any way. Comments should range from intelligent debates to deep philosophical exchanges. The more subjects you can encompass with a single bomb, the more glorious it is.
Bombs may include made up statistics and data, and all grammar and punctuation must be correct.
This requires at least two people, as solo Status Bombing just makes you look like a dick.
Status Bombing should not resemble 'spam' in any way. Comments should range from intelligent debates to deep philosophical exchanges. The more subjects you can encompass with a single bomb, the more glorious it is.
Bombs may include made up statistics and data, and all grammar and punctuation must be correct.
Example of a recent Status Bombing
Victim: "i wonder how much deeper the ocean would be without sponges..?"
Bomber #1: "3.52 cm"
Victim: "oh ok thanx."
Bomber #1: "No problem."
Accidental enabler: "would there be less 'ocean' if there were no jelly fish??"
Victim: "ummm, dont get it?"
Bomber #1: "No, but the water level would be a bit lower."
Bomber #2: "You have to compensate for all the fish that those jellyfish would have killed, so removing the jellyfish might make the ocean levels rise slightly."
(Now it's on)
Bomber #1: "If you want to get technical, you must consider the socio-economic ramifications of pirates on shipping vessels off the Somali coast, and their proportional fish vs. jellyfish impact ratio."
Bomber #2: "Since part of the reason for the uprising of the Somali pirates is due to the overfishing of foreign vessels off their coast, it could be said that, since the pirate vessels are quite small in comparison to that of the foreign fishing boats, an increase in pirate activity would lead to a small increase in ocean levels."
Bomber #1: "It goes deeper, though. The decrease in available fishing water for Chinese fishing vessels (the most prolific) has lead to increased fishing and production in the yellow sea. This, in turn, has led to vast environmental changes, sparking mass spawning of giant Nomura's jellyfish (surveys suggest many billions of the 220kb behemoths). This by far outweighs any fish volume related water increase. All the fish in the Yellow Sea are being eaten, leading to a small decrease in water levels. However, this is outweighed by the aforementioned increase in jellyfish, thus leading to a large increase in global water levels.
Bomber #1: "Besides, it's impossible to 'get rid' of jellyfish anyway, killing or netting them causes them to release millions of self-inseminating eggs."
Bomber #2: "Why not just put sterilizers in the water that only affect the aforementioned cnidarian? Or perhaps one which affects both jellyfish and people? Over the long term, it would cause a rapid decrease in China's population, thus reducing the need to fish in the first place (and thus reducing their carbon emissions, allowing the planet to recover slightly)."
Victim: "AAAA SHUT UP!!"
Bombers to each other: "Status Bombing kicks ass."
Victim: "i wonder how much deeper the ocean would be without sponges..?"
Bomber #1: "3.52 cm"
Victim: "oh ok thanx."
Bomber #1: "No problem."
Accidental enabler: "would there be less 'ocean' if there were no jelly fish??"
Victim: "ummm, dont get it?"
Bomber #1: "No, but the water level would be a bit lower."
Bomber #2: "You have to compensate for all the fish that those jellyfish would have killed, so removing the jellyfish might make the ocean levels rise slightly."
(Now it's on)
Bomber #1: "If you want to get technical, you must consider the socio-economic ramifications of pirates on shipping vessels off the Somali coast, and their proportional fish vs. jellyfish impact ratio."
Bomber #2: "Since part of the reason for the uprising of the Somali pirates is due to the overfishing of foreign vessels off their coast, it could be said that, since the pirate vessels are quite small in comparison to that of the foreign fishing boats, an increase in pirate activity would lead to a small increase in ocean levels."
Bomber #1: "It goes deeper, though. The decrease in available fishing water for Chinese fishing vessels (the most prolific) has lead to increased fishing and production in the yellow sea. This, in turn, has led to vast environmental changes, sparking mass spawning of giant Nomura's jellyfish (surveys suggest many billions of the 220kb behemoths). This by far outweighs any fish volume related water increase. All the fish in the Yellow Sea are being eaten, leading to a small decrease in water levels. However, this is outweighed by the aforementioned increase in jellyfish, thus leading to a large increase in global water levels.
Bomber #1: "Besides, it's impossible to 'get rid' of jellyfish anyway, killing or netting them causes them to release millions of self-inseminating eggs."
Bomber #2: "Why not just put sterilizers in the water that only affect the aforementioned cnidarian? Or perhaps one which affects both jellyfish and people? Over the long term, it would cause a rapid decrease in China's population, thus reducing the need to fish in the first place (and thus reducing their carbon emissions, allowing the planet to recover slightly)."
Victim: "AAAA SHUT UP!!"
Bombers to each other: "Status Bombing kicks ass."
by JimbotheBomber May 10, 2009
Get the Status Bombing mug.A status diss is when a person on myspace quickly updates their status after finding out someone that they don't like,a loser or anyone that you wouldn't want to have on your status comments, comments your status
Joe's status:I just saw eclipse it was a pretty cool movie 1:21pm
comments:loser Billy:yEA mAn tHaT mOvIe wAs tOtAlLy KoOl aNd OfF tHe hOoK LmFaO
Joe's status:off to the mall with my girlfriend
1:23pm
loser Billy just got a status diss
comments:loser Billy:yEA mAn tHaT mOvIe wAs tOtAlLy KoOl aNd OfF tHe hOoK LmFaO
Joe's status:off to the mall with my girlfriend
1:23pm
loser Billy just got a status diss
by Status,dissed,faked,my,space, July 11, 2010
Get the Status diss mug.