progressive stack

The hierarchy of identities on the identity politics social justice Left. A product of Social Marxist intersectionality, the stack is used to determine which people are more oppressed than others based on their inherent characteristics and therefore more entitled to speak and/or have opinions on the topic at hand. The acquired characteristics that make a person a distinct individual are irrelevant.

Identities are generally ranked as privileged or oppressed in the order which follows: race (white/non-white), gender (cis/trans), sex (male/female), sexuality (hetero/LGB+), ability (able/disabled), class (upper & middle/lower and working). Religion (Christian/non-Christian) may also be a factor, depending on the circumstances.

"Occupy Wall Street’s General Assembly operates under a revolutionary 'progressive stack.”' A normal 'stack' means those who wish to speak get in line. A progressive stack encourages women and traditionally marginalized groups speak before men, especially white men."

As a black female, Michelle Obama is inherently oppressed by *all* white homeless men. Except, possibly, transgendered white homeless men; we're not sure about them?

by Amok3 March 1, 2019

five step process

Step One: flatter and sweet talk
Step Two: pretend you're husband material
Step Three: send shirtless pic
Step Four: talk about the future
Step Five: send dick pic

This process never fails in getting girls.

Justin Choi executed the five step process flawlessly.

by jchoi1001 October 1, 2017

Work in Progress

A state of being where your mental health isn't the best and you always self-improve, often to varying degrees. It is perfectly normal as nobody is truly perfect.

Employer: Why have you had ten jobs in a single year?

Mary: Sorry, I am a work in progress.

by Abba Palindrome January 26, 2020

Process Weenie

Process Weenie (n): Someone whose sole reason for existence is to insist that the “process be followed”, often at the detriment to a reasonable, and timely outcome, and in direct defiance of common sense and logic.

The process weenie is blocking us from getting the project done on time.

by hightidetech March 4, 2009

fuck up a one car funeral procession

this is for the complete lamo that most likely doesn't have 2 brain cells to bounce together. If you think about a funeral procession, and how it takes a little bit of effort to keep it organized...now pare it down to one car, yes, just one car - the idiot him/herself.

That moron could fuck up a one car funeral procession.

by grataballi October 23, 2005

Blast processing

Dumbing down technology so that nintendont fanboys todays apple fanboys equivalent can understand technology for example Sega Genesis processor was over 2x as powerful as SNES doesn't have same ring as blast processing. Just like Android has features apple can't even begin to understand to copy for a few years

You dog the Lexus is better than that amg mercedez... That amg is a gimmick...like blast processing on the Sega Genesis

by Mickeymantle25 July 31, 2016

liberal/progressive christians

Cool people who, unlike their fundamentalist counterparts, don't need to turn their backs on modern science to keep their faith alive
The famous Jewish philosopher Maimonides once said that if science conflicts with Scripture, then it must be Scripture we have misunderstood.
It's sad these words of wisdom died out so long ago

Since creationists are likely to disagree with the idea that modern science like evolution is sufficiently supported, I'll go ahead and quote the renowned biologist Douglas Futuyma,

"The statement that organisms have descended with modifications from common ancestors—the historical reality of evolution—is not a theory. It is a fact, as fully as the fact of the earth's revolution about the sun."

Theodosius Dobzhansky had this to say in his famous paper "Nothing in Biology Makes Sense Except in the Light of Evolution",

"I am a creationist and an evolutionist. Evolution is God's, or Nature's method of creation. Creation is not an event that happened in 4004 BC; it is a process that began some 10 billion years ago and is still under way."

He also wrote,

"Does the evolutionary doctrine clash with religious faith? It does not. It is a blunder to mistake the Holy Scriptures for elementary textbooks of astronomy, geology, biology, and anthropology. Only if symbols are construed to mean what they are not intended to mean can there arise imaginary, insoluble conflicts. ...the blunder leads to blasphemy: the Creator is accused of systematic deceitfulness."

Liberal/progressive Christians do not believe in a deceiving God. They know that, considering the overwhelming amount of evidence for evolution, to deny it would be equivalent to denying the existence of ancient Rome or Greece.

by Submitters of Words November 25, 2011